Balancing left and center | Edwards Watch | Indy Week
Pin It

Balancing left and center 

When Elizabeth Edwards chastised MoveOn.org for its full-page "General Betray Us" ad in The New York Times, was it an attempt to appeal to the political center or just good Southern manners?

MoveOn is a progressive organization with 3 million members that holds positions on the issues, including Iraq, which most closely mirror John Edwards' among the presidential candidates. But in an interview with an Iowa newspaper, Elizabeth Edwards said MoveOn went too far by casting its criticism of Gen. David Petraeus' congressional testimony as a personal insult. "Someone who's spent their life in the military doesn't deserve 'General Betray Us,'" she said.

Elizabeth spoke the day after John Edwards paid for time on MSNBC to rebut the President's Iraq speech. Edwards again called on Congress to end the war by refusing to appropriate more money without a timetable for withdrawal. The juxtaposition underlined the balancing act the Edwards campaign is attempting. Edwards is running hard to the left of Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama for the Democratic nomination. But he's also arguing that he'd be the strongest candidate against the Republican nominee because he'd "expand the map" of winnable states into the South, suggesting a more centrist approach.

Edwards' answer? This week it was Elizabeth reminding voters that the South respects its military folk (her dad was a career Navy pilot, which wasn't mentioned in the interview) and minds its manners; meanwhile, John hones a message that's not so much liberal as it is traditional Southern populism: anti-corporate, anti-lobbyist and ultimately anti-Hillary. "Lord knows, we need a Democrat in the White House, but that's not enough," Edwards keeps saying. "I don't just want to replace a corporate Republican with a corporate Democrat."

Comments

Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

INDY Week publishes all kinds of comments, but we don't publish everything.

  • Comments that are not contributing to the conversation will be removed.
  • Comments that include ad hominem attacks will also be removed.
  • Please do not copy and paste the full text of a press release.

Permitted HTML:
  • To create paragraphs in your comment, type <p> at the start of a paragraph and </p> at the end of each paragraph.
  • To create bold text, type <b>bolded text</b> (please note the closing tag, </b>).
  • To create italicized text, type <i>italicized text</i> (please note the closing tag, </i>).
  • Proper web addresses will automatically become links.

Latest in Edwards Watch



Twitter Activity

Most Recent Comments

I agree - John Edwards is part of the health care problem. His ridiculous settlements with insurance companies makes Healthcare …

by tomgee on Why Edwards' policies caught on, but he didn't (Edwards Watch)

People seem to not realize the cost of John's great wealth from those law suits will be passed down to …

by ZEN on Why Edwards' policies caught on, but he didn't (Edwards Watch)

GO-GO-GO GEORGE EDWARDS

by graurog on Still 47 states to go for Edwards (Edwards Watch)

Very good piece. I wish the media would have more discussions like this for the voters. I think any progressive …

by pmorlan on Edwards vs. Obama: Up with history (Edwards Watch)

Ron who?

by JohnD on On the ropes (Edwards Watch)

Comments

I agree - John Edwards is part of the health care problem. His ridiculous settlements with insurance companies makes Healthcare …

by tomgee on Why Edwards' policies caught on, but he didn't (Edwards Watch)

People seem to not realize the cost of John's great wealth from those law suits will be passed down to …

by ZEN on Why Edwards' policies caught on, but he didn't (Edwards Watch)

Most Read

No recently-read stories.

Visit the archives…

© 2016 Indy Week • 201 W. Main St., Suite 101, Durham, NC 27701 • phone 919-286-1972 • fax 919-286-4274
RSS Feeds | Powered by Foundation