Baker: No blank check for Wall Street | National | Indy Week
Pin It
Progressive economist in Raleigh today to discuss bailout plan

Baker: No blank check for Wall Street 

Done properly, Dean Baker says, the $700 billion “bailout” of Wall Street and the big banks shouldn’t cost the taxpayers a dime. “My view,” the progressive economist told the Indy following a speech in Raleigh today, “is that [the bailout] is necessary, but if it’s structured right, we’re not giving the banks anything. We’re keeping the banks functioning, and that’s in the public interest.”

Baker’s picture and comments about the bailout plan are on the front page of The New York Times today. Co-director of the Center for Economic and Policy Research in Washington, D.C., Baker was one of a handful of economists who saw the housing bubble for what it was while it was happening—in the years from 2003 to 2006—and who predicted it would burst.

Since Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson and Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke proposed their $700 billion rescue plan, Baker’s been among the most vociferous opponents of giving them a “blank check.”

In Raleigh for a luncheon sponsored by N.C. Policy Watch and the N.C. Justice Center, Baker expressed guarded optimism that congressional Democrats are in the process of surrounding the rescue with enough safeguards that it will no longer be “blank.”

There are several keys to protecting taxpayer dollars:

    Buy bank assets only at auctions or by other methods that assure that taxpayers are getting what they pay for; back that up with profit-sharing, so that if taxpayers lose on the assets over time, they’re paid back with capital (stock) in the selling bank.

    Limit CEO and executive compensation at participating banks; no rules on what Wall Street can pay, but for banks that want access to the $700 billion, they must agree to limits on their pay.

    Banks drawing on the $700 billion must agree to reduce mortgage rates for their “underwater” customers (those with housing values below what they owe), or at least to offer customers a way to stay in their homes as renters.

“Punish Wall Street” is Baker’s chief maxim for a successful bailout package. Banks should “feel the pain,” he said, caused by their own carelessness, and they should be made to endure the bulk of the losses they’ve incurred, with taxpayer funds used “only where necessary to sustain the orderly operation of the financial system.”

None of these requirements were in the initial, two-and-a-half page Paulson-Bernanke plan, which did include a carefully drawn proscription against any court or congressional review of anything the Treasury might do with the money.

But Baker said that over the past four days, Connecticut Sen. Chris Dodd, chair of the Senate Banking Committee, and other House and Senate Democratic leaders, have been crafting a solid bill with “the right safeguards.”

Included in their legislation is an oversight board with authority to monitor what prices the Treasury winds up paying for bank assets and how much they’re finally worth, he said.

Thus, the point of the bailout package, he said, is to help the banks “de-leverage” and allow them time to address their liquidity problems—not to hand them money with no strings attached.

And because the package shouldn’t cost taxpayers in the long run, Baker said, it’s no reason for the Congress or public to be afraid of spending on a major economic stimulus package in 2009, action that Baker thinks will be critical to help lift the nation out of recession.

Baker’s ’09 forecast is for a continued slump in housing prices, unemployment to rise over 7 percent (it’s now at 6.1 percent nationally, 6.9 percent in North Carolina), and an official recession to replace the unofficial one we have now, which has resulted in jobs losses averaging 100,000 a month since January.

The country should take the “opportunity” presented by the current mess, Baker said, to: 1) rein in excessive executive salaries throughout corporate America (partially a product, he thinks, of Wall Street envy); 2) use the falling dollar, and higher import costs, to increase manufacturing and saving rates, while consumption falls; and 3) fix the health care system, which is “unsustainable” at costs that are twice those of other industrialized nations with outcomes that are no better than theirs.

The country should begin to emerge from recession in 2010, Baker said. And while the banking crisis will be painful, if managed correctly it will be behind us, he predicted, “in three to four years.”

  • Progressive economist in Raleigh today to discuss bailout plan

Comments

Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

INDY Week publishes all kinds of comments, but we don't publish everything.

  • Comments that are not contributing to the conversation will be removed.
  • Comments that include ad hominem attacks will also be removed.
  • Please do not copy and paste the full text of a press release.

Permitted HTML:
  • To create paragraphs in your comment, type <p> at the start of a paragraph and </p> at the end of each paragraph.
  • To create bold text, type <b>bolded text</b> (please note the closing tag, </b>).
  • To create italicized text, type <i>italicized text</i> (please note the closing tag, </i>).
  • Proper web addresses will automatically become links.

Latest in National

More by Bob Geary

Latest videos from the INDY

Twitter Activity

Comments

Electric cars are in demand now days and due to its fuel efficiency or economy nature we have found that …

by neilhunter on How the electric car will save us (National)

What bullshit! ACORN is as crooked as they come. …

by billsweb on For a bogeyman, ACORN sure is small (National)

Most Read

No recently-read stories.

Visit the archives…

© 2015 Indy Week • 201 W. Main St., Suite 101, Durham, NC 27701 • phone 919-286-1972 • fax 919-286-4274
RSS Feeds | Powered by Foundation