Back Talk | Letters to the Editor | Indy Week
Pin It

Back Talk 

Letters to the Editor

Cool it NOW
Gary Phillips was not the only one hurt by the mail and phone campaign led by "Chatham County NOW" that was the feature of Jennifer Strom's "How Bunkey Won" article [Oct. 2]. The Triangle-area chapters of the National Organization for Women have been fielding calls and e-mails from concerned Chatham County citizens who were confused by what appeared to be a NOW chapter's radical stance against a local county commissioner.

North Carolina NOW would like to stress that these mailings are not connected to the National Organization for Women, which has no chapter in Chatham County. Further, no one listed as "founding members" on the Chatham County NOW mailings are members of the National Organization for Women.

As an organization, NOW does not endorse political candidates. The NOW Political Action Committee makes political endorsements, but did not endorse anyone in Chatham County this year. Had a Chatham County endorsement been made, it would have been paid for by "NC NOW PAC," as opposed to "NOW." NOW is the largest feminist organization in the nation, with over half a million members and 550 chapters in 50 states and the District of Columbia. We are displeased that Chatham County NOW chose, whether intentionally or not, to use a name that has been synonymous with women's liberation for the past three decades to use in a negative advertising campaign. We hope that in the future, Chatham County NOW and the press that may publicize it take steps to affirm that it is not involved with the National Organization for Women.

For more information on actual NOW chapters in the area, visit www.now.org or e-mail chd_now@yahoo.com.


–REBECCA MANN, PRESIDENT OF CHAPEL HILL/DURHAM NOW

Family man
In Bob Geary's recent article, "All in the Family, Raleigh-style," [Front Porch, Oct. 9] about the grassroots effort to redefine the definition of "family" in order to rescue single-family neighborhoods from student rentals, it is noted that Gary (it's actually Jerry) Goldberg spoke out against the proposal, saying that enforcement is the problem. He claims that there is no point in changing a law that can't be enforced. You may be interested to know that Mr. Goldberg has a stake in the status quo; he owns two lots in a Special R-6 zoning district (six homes per acre, maximum) near NCSU and is building student rentals on them, using he current definition of "family" as a loophole to build what amounts to apartment buildings in a district limited to single-family homes.
–MARK DICKEY, RALEIGH

Office spice
Some secretaries actually relish a good spanking ["Wilson's New Beat," Oct. 9]. While you might think that these women are duped, they are actually in control ... How very convenient.

Please note well that Professor Wilson spins her intriguing fantasies at an institution where those who pour the java and type the minutes have bare-minimal job protection, no parental leave to speak of, and no say about departmental policies. Their employer has expertly squelched all efforts at unionization. They put on their Dress Barn suits, curl their hair, and smile compliantly each day to keep their children fed. But, Wilson suggests, such an environment may provide these otherwise-repressed Southern ladies with the excitement of uncertainty, with a little spice. And, after all, they may truly be the ones calling the shots.

This new, "complicated" feminism is about the titillation of the Starbucks class, and Wilson represents the line masterfully. This playfully postmodern generation of feminism serves well to keep the decision-making class of women (not to mention men) centered on our own masturbatory projects. Reveling in sexual liberation, upper-class women have previously found themselves a tad bit haunted by the possible plight of women below us on the food chain. This film effectively closes that gap.

I predict that Wilson will become the lovely new spokeswoman for my generation and class of women. We may play freely, explore new sex toys, and guiltlessly delete a summons from the tediously old-fashioned feminist down the hall who is still working for unionization at Duke. Thanks, we needed that.
–AMY LAURA HALL, ASSISTANT PROFESSOR OF THEOLOGICAL ETHICS, DUKE UINIOVERSITY, DURHAM

Cuban missive crisis
Jean Ranc's review of Cuba Diaries: An American Housewife in Havana ["Havana: Two Tales of a City," Oct. 16] is certainly one way of looking at Isadora Tattlin's book, albeit a distorted and transparently biased one. For those who are interested in deeper and more even-handed reviews, some of which are written by native Cubans, Cuban Americans, and scholars of Cuba, I encourage you to research the archives of The New York Times, Los Angeles Times, Miami Herald, San Francisco Chronicle, Entertainment Weekly, the Tennessean, Commentary, and USA Today, among others.

Scott Simon's interview with Tattlin can be listened to on NPR's Web site. It's the same interview that set Ms. Ranc on her curious mission to do a hatchet job on Cuba Diaries, before she even laid eyes on the book.b
–MICHAEL TAECKENS, SENIOR PUBLICIST, ALGONQUIN BOOKS, CHAPEL HILL

  • Letters to the Editor

Latest in Letters to the Editor

Comments

Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

INDY Week publishes all kinds of comments, but we don't publish everything.

  • Comments that are not contributing to the conversation will be removed.
  • Comments that include ad hominem attacks will also be removed.
  • Please do not copy and paste the full text of a press release.

Permitted HTML:
  • To create paragraphs in your comment, type <p> at the start of a paragraph and </p> at the end of each paragraph.
  • To create bold text, type <b>bolded text</b> (please note the closing tag, </b>).
  • To create italicized text, type <i>italicized text</i> (please note the closing tag, </i>).
  • Proper web addresses will automatically become links.

Latest in Letters to the Editor



Twitter Activity

Most Recent Comments

Thank you cleverweist1 and Cristel Gutshchenritter Orrand for the opportunity to stand up for what I believe in as a …

by half full on A Massive Scar (Letters to the Editor)

Mr Pollock makes some good points .
Noam Chomsky and Ron Paul have similar views on wars we have waged …

by CHHS Tiger on History you won't like either (Letters to the Editor)

Sadly, this letter, while well-meaning, is deeply flawed. The background check gun control law has failed but it can never …

by ProudlyUnaffiliated on No new gun laws! (Letters to the Editor)

For the life of me, I do not understand why folks keep yelling about their 2nd Amendment rights as though …

by cityfox on No new gun laws! (Letters to the Editor)

It seems the real problem with the guns is that the wrong people can get them illegally by : stealing …

by CHHS Tiger on No new gun laws! (Letters to the Editor)

Comments

Thank you cleverweist1 and Cristel Gutshchenritter Orrand for the opportunity to stand up for what I believe in as a …

by half full on A Massive Scar (Letters to the Editor)

Mr Pollock makes some good points .
Noam Chomsky and Ron Paul have similar views on wars we have waged …

by CHHS Tiger on History you won't like either (Letters to the Editor)

Most Read

  1. Smug Revisionism (Letters to the Editor)
  2. Dot-con (Peripheral Visions)

© 2016 Indy Week • 201 W. Main St., Suite 101, Durham, NC 27701 • phone 919-286-1972 • fax 919-286-4274
RSS Feeds | Powered by Foundation