Pin It
Letters to the Editor

Back Talk 

Letters to the Editor

Praiseworthy perspectives
Thank you, thank you, thank you for giving us what needed to be said about Bush and Iraq and war and so many things which needed to be said ["We Still Don't Get It," Sept. 11]. Congratulations on your courage also to put all these truths in print.
—BERT AND LORRAINE GEIGER, CHAPEL HILL

I commend The Independent on its Sept. 11-17 issue!

How nice to see so many progressives and friends in print along with the insightful pieces from staff writers and usual contributors.

Thank you.
—MARGARET MISCH, CHAPEL HILL

Questions in Chatham
The sucking sound heard in the Triangle on election night was the sound of Chatham county being sucked back into the 20th century. Voters failed to return Gary Phillips, a progressive, forward-thinking commissioner with a solid track record to office and rejected an excellent opportunity to elect David LeGrys comissioner, an individual with the depth of thinking and articulation necessary to evaluate and deal with complex issues.

Negativity ruled the day as my mailbox was stuffed with campaign flyers viciously attacking and distorting the record of Gary Phillips during the last two weeks of the campaign. Three such ads came from Chatham County NOW, a group in Siler City that no one seems to know about. Fourteen "founding members" are listed on the flyers, but one I contacted denies being present at any formative meetings of NOW or contributing financially to the group. He even publicicly stated such by taking an ad in the Chatham Record to deny his involvement with the group. So, who is Chatham County NOW and who funded these flyers? And who funded the push poll that was done in Chatham a month prior to the election? And who bought the Chatham County election? I don't know the answers to these questions, but Tuesday, Sept. 10, was a sad day for me and a lot of progressive thinkers in Chatham County. The developers are now drooling at the prospect of saving Chatham from itself and carving up the county into their own little fiefdoms. I'm bracing myself for the bulldozers to come barreling over the county line. In the meantime, I can be found drowning my sorrows in the bar of one of many strip malls that are sure to sprout along 15-501 between Chapel Hill and Pittsboro.
—JOYCE BAIRD, CHAPEL HILL

Complaint clarity
My complaint was the one referred to in the postmortem synopsis of our sorry Chatham County Primary ["Ballot Box Blues," Trotline, Sept. 18]. Somewhere between the event and the reporting the story got slightly garbled. The Morganistas didn't start harassing me upon finding out I was going to vote for Phillips (though I was). Rather, the contretemps arose over a "discussion" about property taxes. I, evidently, provoked my interrogator beyond his limited capability for belief when I said that I had no problem with my last tax bill. Gary Phillip's name actually never came up during my trek to the Pittsboro east polling station. During the hearing the Chatham BOE held to settle the affair, the chair of the BOE was most upset and actually very rude to me because (I think) I had "gone outside" the county and had initially taken my complaint to the Institute for Southern Studies. But, as I tried to point out, the local BOE didn't make information about voter complaints readily available at the site, so I took the complaint to the folks recommended by Pete MacDowell, Gary Phillips' representative at the polls that evening.
—BOB MCCONNAUGHEY, PITTSBORO

Clarification
Marcus Williams, a candidate for the state Court of Appeals, was in the process of returning his completed candidate survey to The Independent when we went to press with our endorsements. The address on file at the state Board of Elections for Williams--who lost his Democratic primary bid for the Thomas seat--was incorrect and another survey had been mailed out to him.

talk back
Got something to say about an Independent article? Send no more than 300 words to backtalk@indyweek.com; to P.O. Box 2690, Durham 27715; or fax 286-4274. Include your name, phone number and mailing address for verification; we cannot publish a letter without confirmation from the writer. We reserve the right to edit letters for length, style and clarity.

  • Letters to the Editor

Comments

Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

INDY Week publishes all kinds of comments, but we don't publish everything.

  • Comments that are not contributing to the conversation will be removed.
  • Comments that include ad hominem attacks will also be removed.
  • Please do not copy and paste the full text of a press release.

Permitted HTML:
  • To create paragraphs in your comment, type <p> at the start of a paragraph and </p> at the end of each paragraph.
  • To create bold text, type <b>bolded text</b> (please note the closing tag, </b>).
  • To create italicized text, type <i>italicized text</i> (please note the closing tag, </i>).
  • Proper web addresses will automatically become links.

Latest in Letters to the Editor

Facebook Activity

Twitter Activity

Comments

Lisa, why did you choose to publish Victoria Hart's (edited) comment in the newspaper, which was primarily about the author …

by Brandon Becker on Back talk (Letters to the Editor)

Victoria, Since we have a 300-word maximum on letters, but no max on comments, we edit letters for clarity. Your …

by Lisa Sorg on Back talk (Letters to the Editor)

© 2014 Indy Week • 201 W. Main St., Suite 101, Durham, NC 27701 • phone 919-286-1972 • fax 919-286-4274
RSS Feeds | Powered by Foundation