Pin It
Letters to the Editor

Back Talk 

Letters to the Editor

Up in smoke
Thank you for your article on smoking prevention and the North Carolina tobacco settlement. I am not an North Carolina native, having moved here in 2000 to complete a psychology internship at the VA hospital in Durham. I learned to administer smoking cessation therapy at the VA, and became interested in anti-smoking efforts.

In addition to teen smoking prevention, I believe that teens and young adults need smoking cessation services. That is, if 38 percent of North Carolina high-school students smoke, they should stop as soon as possible to avoid the negative health consequences. Research clearly indicates that young smokers do not expect to be smoking for long, but then have difficulty stopping. I briefly investigated funding options to support smoking cessation efforts, and learned that virtually all of the tobacco settlement money North Carolina receives is being spent on the tobacco industry to fund absurd projects such as ensuring the construction of a new tobacco processing plant. I was appalled and realized immediately that the tobacco settlement is controlled by good ol' boys who are not interested in reducing smoking in this state. So I thank you for calling attention to this important problem that could eventually promote death and disability for thousands of men and women in North Carolina.
--JOEL W. HUGHES, PH.D. DURHAM

Correction
A graphic accompanying last week's story "An Ounce of Prevention" had some incorrect figures for the state's share of the tobacco-settlement. Of the $4.6 billion the state will receive over the next 25 years, $3.45 billion will go to tobacco growers, farmers and communities and $1.15 billion will go to health.

talk back
Got something to say about an Independent article? Send no more than 300 words to backtalk@indyweek.com; to P.O. Box 2690, Durham 27715; or fax 286-4274. Include your name, phone number and mailing address for verification; we cannot publish a letter without confirmation from the writer. We reserve the right to edit letters for length, style and clarity.

  • Letters to the Editor

Comments (0)

Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

INDY Week publishes all kinds of comments, but we don't publish everything.

  • Comments that are not contributing to the conversation will be removed.
  • Comments that include ad hominem attacks will also be removed.
  • Please do not copy and paste the full text of a press release.

Permitted HTML:
  • To create paragraphs in your comment, type <p> at the start of a paragraph and </p> at the end of each paragraph.
  • To create bold text, type <b>bolded text</b> (please note the closing tag, </b>).
  • To create italicized text, type <i>italicized text</i> (please note the closing tag, </i>).
  • Proper web addresses will automatically become links.

Latest in Letters to the Editor

  • Re: Climate change; clean energy

    "Duke, Exxon and the Koch Brothers may be turning up the heat, but they're also investing in political power and public relations (i.e. lies)."
    • May 8, 2013
  • Re: Climate change

    "I have found the climate movement here to be not only alive and well, but growing and gaining momentum."
    • May 1, 2013
  • Re: Renewable energy; Goathouse Refuge

    "Sadly, House Bill 298, which rolls back our Renewable Energy Portfolio Standards requirement, passed through the House commerce subcommittee by a narrow margin."
    • Apr 10, 2013
  • More »

Facebook Activity

Twitter Activity

Read indyweek's Tweets

Comments

Following what I also agree was a rather one sided article, I am pleased to see comments in support of …

by Helen Needham on Re: Goathouse Refuge (Letters to the Editor)

The Democrats are cheating my kids out of a life of freedom and liberty!

by Sheila Barber on Re: Political reporting; fracking; "Bash the Old Folks" (a McCrory poem) (Letters to the Editor)

© 2013 Indy Week • 302 E. Pettigrew St., Suite 300, Durham, NC 27701 • phone 919-286-1972 • fax 919-286-4274
RSS Feeds | Powered by Foundation