Back Talk | Letters to the Editor | Indy Week
Pin It

Back Talk 

Letters to the Editor

Safire in the rough

I was fascinated by the article "Straight Shooters" that appeared in your Jan. 24 issue. However, I was jolted by your characterization that some of Reverend Michael Bray's explanations for his writings and speeches "would make a Palestinian terrorist proud."

Where did that cheap, offensive, throwaway reference come from? I won't even try to run you down on the facts behind the death and suffering inflicted on an untold number of Palestinians as a result of Israeli government policies. The hundreds killed just over the last few months should refresh your memory. The legitimacy of Palestinian national self-determination has international recognition, with the notable exception of some elements of our own society, thanks in part to the resilience of reactionary anti-Arab stereotypes in our media. I'm afraid we can now count The Independent in this category of publications that stoops to perpetuate these racist images. I thought The Independent was a progressive voice in our community, an alternative to hackneyed mainstream views of our world. Instead I'm finding journalism here that would make William Safire proud.

John Yewell's otherwise excellent article about the White Rose Banquet [Jan. 24] was marred by the comparison he drew between the "theological edifice" of this Christian group advocating violence against abortion clinics and that of "Palestinian terrorists."

To use the term "Palestinian terrorist" is to place a large number of different people and groups subscribing to a variety of ideologies and employing a diversity of tactics to achieve their goals into a single one-dimensional category. Many people who are considered "Palestinian terrorists" justify the use of violence with religious convictions. Many, however, do not.

Substantial differences exist between groups like the Army of God, which interpret Christian doctrine to justify the violent imposition of their principles on the behavior of others, and Palestinians who draw strength from their faith to struggle, sometimes violently, to end the occupation of their country.

Using Arabs generally, and Palestinians in particular, to represent violence and religious fanaticism contributes to the cultural misunderstandings perpetuated by the mainstream media in this country. I expect more from The Independent than what appears to be a thoughtless resort to sensationalist analogy to make a point.

  • Letters to the Editor

Latest in Letters to the Editor


Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

INDY Week publishes all kinds of comments, but we don't publish everything.

  • Comments that are not contributing to the conversation will be removed.
  • Comments that include ad hominem attacks will also be removed.
  • Please do not copy and paste the full text of a press release.

Permitted HTML:
  • To create paragraphs in your comment, type <p> at the start of a paragraph and </p> at the end of each paragraph.
  • To create bold text, type <b>bolded text</b> (please note the closing tag, </b>).
  • To create italicized text, type <i>italicized text</i> (please note the closing tag, </i>).
  • Proper web addresses will automatically become links.

Latest in Letters to the Editor

Twitter Activity


Thank you cleverweist1 and Cristel Gutshchenritter Orrand for the opportunity to stand up for what I believe in as a …

by half full on A Massive Scar (Letters to the Editor)

Mr Pollock makes some good points .
Noam Chomsky and Ron Paul have similar views on wars we have waged …

by CHHS Tiger on History you won't like either (Letters to the Editor)

Most Read

  1. Hair Don't (Peripheral Visions)
  2. The Myth of Gender (Back Talk)

© 2016 Indy Week • 201 W. Main St., Suite 101, Durham, NC 27701 • phone 919-286-1972 • fax 919-286-4274
RSS Feeds | Powered by Foundation