Pin It
Letters to the Editor

Back Talk 

Letters to the Editor

Re: Matt Jones' "Passion and Strife" [Sept. 6], I'm always glad to read about Durham's greatest cultural contribution to the arts, namely, the golden age of Piedmont blues, that jaunty jiving style of ragtime and blues that emerged in the 1920s and flowered in the '30s and '40s. I would've thought that The Independent--knowing what extensive cultural/historical resources we've got in the region, not to mention the pure soul of this place, would have sponsored a piece that could have made some fresh observations. But I never would have thought that there'd be such distortions and misstatements of music and cultural fact as there were in the piece.

In the first place, contrary to the popular stereotype, blues musicians were not the gimpy, blind, crippled and maimed lot that Matt Jones contends they were. Jones says, "Durham's Trice brothers ... were exceptions as blues musicians; they were not physically impaired." By far, the overwhelming majority were men and women who worked their 9 to 5 (or more likely, their 6 to 9) six days a week and played all night long on Friday, Saturday and often Sunday nights. The late Thomas Burt told me that, in his prime, he'd fall out for work on Monday feeling (and looking) "like somebody shot me."

In the second place, Matt Jones could've picked a far better example of Fuller's sexual wordplay than "Shake it Babies," which comes not from "Rag Mama Rag," but from "Jitterbug Rag," as I recall. (I knew a sweet little old widow woman in East Durham who would describe her husband's dilapidated workshed/garage as her late husband Roland's "honey hole." Blind Boy Fuller sang: "You heard about that sugar plum, and that jelly roll/Ain't nothin' compared to my sweet honey hole."

It's good to be reminded of the irony of Durham morphing from "Bull Durham (city of bad medicine)" to the "City of (good?) Medicine." However, Jones' promising start got lost in a muddle of miscellany, and the ending left me cold. What was the point of that? --Vaughn Clauson, Durham

  • Letters to the Editor

Comments (0)

Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

INDY Week publishes all kinds of comments, but we don't publish everything.

  • Comments that are not contributing to the conversation will be removed.
  • Comments that include ad hominem attacks will also be removed.
  • Please do not copy and paste the full text of a press release.

Permitted HTML:
  • To create paragraphs in your comment, type <p> at the start of a paragraph and </p> at the end of each paragraph.
  • To create bold text, type <b>bolded text</b> (please note the closing tag, </b>).
  • To create italicized text, type <i>italicized text</i> (please note the closing tag, </i>).
  • Proper web addresses will automatically become links.

Latest in Letters to the Editor

  • Re: The Legislature; climate change

    "Thank you many times over for posting the week's N.C. legislative bills passed. Also for the statistics page. Both are very helpful in keeping abreast of the insanity of the radical Republicans in our state government."
    • May 22, 2013
  • Re: Climate change; clean energy

    "Duke, Exxon and the Koch Brothers may be turning up the heat, but they're also investing in political power and public relations (i.e. lies)."
    • May 8, 2013
  • Re: Climate change

    "I have found the climate movement here to be not only alive and well, but growing and gaining momentum."
    • May 1, 2013
  • More »

Facebook Activity

Twitter Activity

Read indyweek's Tweets

Comments

Following what I also agree was a rather one sided article, I am pleased to see comments in support of …

by Helen Needham on Re: Goathouse Refuge (Letters to the Editor)

The Democrats are cheating my kids out of a life of freedom and liberty!

by Sheila Barber on Re: Political reporting; fracking; "Bash the Old Folks" (a McCrory poem) (Letters to the Editor)

© 2013 Indy Week • 302 E. Pettigrew St., Suite 300, Durham, NC 27701 • phone 919-286-1972 • fax 919-286-4274
RSS Feeds | Powered by Foundation