Auditions open for an anti-Clinton? | Edwards Watch | Indy Week
Pin It
After the mainstream media builds you up, it unfailingly tries to take you down.

Auditions open for an anti-Clinton? 

click to enlarge edwards.gif

Weary Edwards Watchers were not surprised at the study showing how the mainstream media has lavished its attentions on Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama. The study, by the Project for Excellence in Journalism and the Joan Shorenstein Center on the Press, Politics and Public Policy, looked at presidential campaign coverage by 48 major news organizations from January through May. Half went to Clinton and Obama on the Democratic side and to Rudy Giuliani, Mitt Romney and John McCain among the Republicans, with the other dozen contenders sharing the rest.

Only half? The MSM's take on the Democratic race since May is that it's a two-way race, with the wily Clinton leading and young Obama, rebel with a Harvard Law degree, the only one who can catch her. But after the MSM builds you up, it unfailingly tries, at least, to take you down. And sure enough, last week its story started to change: Clinton's so far ahead, it said, she's sitting on her lead. (Wily? Or overconfident?) What's worse, Obama's letting her do it. (Can you be a cautious rebel?)

Well, you know what's coming next, and The New York Times served fair warning Sunday (emphasis added): "[Obama's] senior aides," it reported, "said they were now spending much of their day fielding calls ... asking why Mr. Obama was not challenging Mrs. Clinton more forcefully and warning that he could cede the role of the main anti-Clinton candidate to former Senator John Edwards of North Carolina, who is running an aggressive campaign in Iowa."

In sum, shape up, Obama, or the MSM will ship you out and give your part to Edwards. This followed a Los Angeles Times/ Bloomberg poll Oct. 23 showing Clinton ahead of Obama nationally by 48 percent to 17 percent, with Edwards close behind at 13 percent.

Nor did MSM reporters have to look far for evidence of Edwards' greater aggressiveness. Clinton herself served some up in a letter to Iowa voters defending her vote for the controversial Kyl-Lieberman amendment, which branded Iran's military as terrorists. (See "Edwards Watch," Oct. 10.) She was voting for "stepped up diplomacy," not war, Clinton wrote, adding acidly: "I was there, I exercised leadership." This was a shot at Obama, who wasn't there and didn't vote, though he criticized Clinton later. Edwards, the MSM noticed, blasted Clinton's vote the day she cast it and has continued to blast it as a sign of duplicity. She wants primary voters to see her as antiwar, Edwards says. But in Washington, she's staking out her general-election position as a hawk.

And playing right into President Bush's hands if he decides to attack Iran, Edwards adds. "How many times does it take to learn your lesson?" Edwards asked last week. "You give this guy an inch, and he'll take a mile—particularly when it comes to war."

  • After the mainstream media builds you up, it unfailingly tries to take you down.

Comments (2)

Showing 1-2 of 2

Add a comment

 
Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-2 of 2

Add a comment

INDY Week publishes all kinds of comments, but we don't publish everything.

  • Comments that are not contributing to the conversation will be removed.
  • Comments that include ad hominem attacks will also be removed.
  • Please do not copy and paste the full text of a press release.

Permitted HTML:
  • To create paragraphs in your comment, type <p> at the start of a paragraph and </p> at the end of each paragraph.
  • To create bold text, type <b>bolded text</b> (please note the closing tag, </b>).
  • To create italicized text, type <i>italicized text</i> (please note the closing tag, </i>).
  • Proper web addresses will automatically become links.

Latest in Edwards Watch

More by Bob Geary

Latest videos from the INDY

Twitter Activity

Comments

I agree - John Edwards is part of the health care problem. His ridiculous settlements with insurance companies makes Healthcare …

by tomgee on Why Edwards' policies caught on, but he didn't (Edwards Watch)

People seem to not realize the cost of John's great wealth from those law suits will be passed down to …

by ZEN on Why Edwards' policies caught on, but he didn't (Edwards Watch)

Most Read

No recently-read stories.

Visit the archives…

© 2015 Indy Week • 201 W. Main St., Suite 101, Durham, NC 27701 • phone 919-286-1972 • fax 919-286-4274
RSS Feeds | Powered by Foundation