Pin It

Anti-lottery forces come up winners 

In the 10 weeks that a lottery referendum sat on the state house daily calendar this summer, lawmakers seeking to balance North Carolina's books declined to raise revenue by closing corporate loopholes while at the same time cutting money to schools and social service programs, eliminating pay raises for state workers, and planning to keep (and spend) $330 million that belongs to counties and towns. The last move has prompted a lawsuit by local leaders furious that they may have to raise the regressive sales tax to balance their budgets, spinning the budget debate into North Carolina's courtrooms.

Meanwhile, Gov. Mike Easley's pro-lottery coalition complained to anyone who would listen that if only House Republicans and progressive Democrats who opposed the lottery--for very different reasons--would just fall in line behind their leader, the state's budget woes would ease, schools would improve and we'd all live luckily ever after.

Easley's magic-cure-all argument shriveled like North Carolina's reservoirs as the summer wore on, and still, the lottery referendum sat on the calendar, with Speaker Jim Black promising to bring it up for a vote before the session wound down.

And then a last-minute effort by lottery supporters lowered the bar even further, when House Democrats threatened to include the referendum in the final budget proposal, putting the squeeze on opponents who wanted to vote yes on a spending plan and no on the lottery. To his credit, Black put the measure to a vote by itself on Sept. 17, two and a half months after it first appeared on the calendar. The resounding defeat, a 69-50 vote, dealt Easley's leadership a blow he called "unbelievable."

"The lottery vote was a huge victory for working families and a fairer tax system for low and moderate-income people," says Kim Cartron of the N.C. Budget and Tax Center, a progressive think-tank. "The last thing they needed was a lottery taking tax dollars out of their pockets."

The governor didn't think so. In a temper tantrum, Easley retaliated by publicly decrying the $70 million in "additional cuts" legislators would have to make to "make up for" lost lottery revenue--income he shouldn't have budgeted in the first place.

Perhaps now the governor and his lottery supporters can spend a little less time and energy on a issue that never had the votes to succeed, and come up with some less-regressive ideas of how to trim the remaining $100 million that still holds the state's final spending plan in the red.

Loopholes, anyone?

Comments (0)

Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

INDY Week publishes all kinds of comments, but we don't publish everything.

  • Comments that are not contributing to the conversation will be removed.
  • Comments that include ad hominem attacks will also be removed.
  • Please do not copy and paste the full text of a press release.

Permitted HTML:
  • To create paragraphs in your comment, type <p> at the start of a paragraph and </p> at the end of each paragraph.
  • To create bold text, type <b>bolded text</b> (please note the closing tag, </b>).
  • To create italicized text, type <i>italicized text</i> (please note the closing tag, </i>).
  • Proper web addresses will automatically become links.

Latest in Front Porch

  • Being the community

    In Raleigh's Moore Square and around Main Street in Durham, we ignore people who we assume don't have housing. Rocky and those like him go to Love Wins or the Maurin House to find eye contact, to hear a "good morning," to be a part of their cities.
    • May 15, 2013
  • High places

    Quietly, by the guidance of our flashlights, we climbed a very long, tight spiral staircase up to the top of the Duke Chapel tower. And not just the bell-tower top, but beyond that.
    • May 8, 2013
  • Blade running

    There it was, for half price: a snow blade/grader attachment for my almighty DR All-Terrain brush mower. "Who doesn't need one of those?"
    • May 1, 2013
  • More »

More by Jennifer Strom

  • Sandy face

    The week after Hurricane Sandy, we were no longer residents of the Lower East Side, of Chelsea or Chinatown, TriBeCa or Battery Park. We were the newly dubbed neighborhood of SoPo: "South of Power."
    • Nov 7, 2012
  • More »

Facebook Activity

Twitter Activity

Read indyweek's Tweets

Comments

Regarding: A Pint for Oscar

Dear Bill Kirk,
I’m not surprised to read that you remember the night you …

by OldOak Homestead on A pint for Oscar (Front Porch)

Apparently no livestock were kept on that inherited farm.

by Fuzzsonic on Dancing babies (Front Porch)

© 2013 Indy Week • 302 E. Pettigrew St., Suite 300, Durham, NC 27701 • phone 919-286-1972 • fax 919-286-4274
RSS Feeds | Powered by Foundation