Another reason for military recruiting shortages | Letters to the Editor | Indy Week
Pin It

Another reason for military recruiting shortages 

Just a heads-up on military manpower to ensure you are cautious about attributing personnel shortages to disgust with the war ("Uncle Sam wants YOU for the U.S. Army (really, really badly)," by Mosi Secret, March 26).

Most recruitment issues derive from demographic issues—primarily, the baby bust. Much of Ronald Reagan's foreign and domestic policy addressed a foreseeable labor shortage produced by low birthrates in the '80s and '90s. Offshoring and a host of other prophylactic steps minimized the impact of labor shortage everywhere but the military—in spite of Reagan, George H.W. Bush and Bill Clinton all reducing the size of the military.

The hazard of assuming that military shortages derive from disgust with the war (and among commissioned officers, that is a large part of shortage) is that the shortage ends in 2010 when the "reflex baby boom" hits the job market. We've been building schools like crazy to house these little rascals for the past 15 years, and now they're about to enter the job market.

Cannon fodder will get right cheap shortly.

Thanks for the statistical summary.

Tom Magnuson
Hillsborough

Latest in Letters to the Editor

Comments

Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

INDY Week publishes all kinds of comments, but we don't publish everything.

  • Comments that are not contributing to the conversation will be removed.
  • Comments that include ad hominem attacks will also be removed.
  • Please do not copy and paste the full text of a press release.

Permitted HTML:
  • To create paragraphs in your comment, type <p> at the start of a paragraph and </p> at the end of each paragraph.
  • To create bold text, type <b>bolded text</b> (please note the closing tag, </b>).
  • To create italicized text, type <i>italicized text</i> (please note the closing tag, </i>).
  • Proper web addresses will automatically become links.

Latest in Letters to the Editor



Twitter Activity

Most Recent Comments

Please, Mr. Keen, inform us on what kind of person Hilary Clinton is. But please leave out the innuendo, unsupported …

by GorSun on Smug Revisionism (Letters to the Editor)

Thank you cleverweist1 and Cristel Gutshchenritter Orrand for the opportunity to stand up for what I believe in as a …

by half full on A Massive Scar (Letters to the Editor)

Mr Pollock makes some good points .
Noam Chomsky and Ron Paul have similar views on wars we have waged …

by CHHS Tiger on History you won't like either (Letters to the Editor)

Sadly, this letter, while well-meaning, is deeply flawed. The background check gun control law has failed but it can never …

by ProudlyUnaffiliated on No new gun laws! (Letters to the Editor)

For the life of me, I do not understand why folks keep yelling about their 2nd Amendment rights as though …

by cityfox on No new gun laws! (Letters to the Editor)

Comments

Please, Mr. Keen, inform us on what kind of person Hilary Clinton is. But please leave out the innuendo, unsupported …

by GorSun on Smug Revisionism (Letters to the Editor)

Thank you cleverweist1 and Cristel Gutshchenritter Orrand for the opportunity to stand up for what I believe in as a …

by half full on A Massive Scar (Letters to the Editor)

Most Read

  1. Appropriate Appropriation (Letters to the Editor)
  2. Oaths (Peripheral Visions)

© 2017 Indy Week • 201 W. Main St., Suite 101, Durham, NC 27701 • phone 919-286-1972 • fax 919-286-4274
RSS Feeds | Powered by Foundation