Pin It
We've been building schools like crazy to house these little rascals for the past 15 years, and now they're about to enter the job market. Cannon fodder will get right cheap shortly.

Another reason for military recruiting shortages 

Just a heads-up on military manpower to ensure you are cautious about attributing personnel shortages to disgust with the war ("Uncle Sam wants YOU for the U.S. Army (really, really badly)," by Mosi Secret, March 26).

Most recruitment issues derive from demographic issues—primarily, the baby bust. Much of Ronald Reagan's foreign and domestic policy addressed a foreseeable labor shortage produced by low birthrates in the '80s and '90s. Offshoring and a host of other prophylactic steps minimized the impact of labor shortage everywhere but the military—in spite of Reagan, George H.W. Bush and Bill Clinton all reducing the size of the military.

The hazard of assuming that military shortages derive from disgust with the war (and among commissioned officers, that is a large part of shortage) is that the shortage ends in 2010 when the "reflex baby boom" hits the job market. We've been building schools like crazy to house these little rascals for the past 15 years, and now they're about to enter the job market.

Cannon fodder will get right cheap shortly.

Thanks for the statistical summary.

Tom Magnuson
Hillsborough

Comments (0)

Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

INDY Week publishes all kinds of comments, but we don't publish everything.

  • Comments that are not contributing to the conversation will be removed.
  • Comments that include ad hominem attacks will also be removed.
  • Please do not copy and paste the full text of a press release.

Permitted HTML:
  • To create paragraphs in your comment, type <p> at the start of a paragraph and </p> at the end of each paragraph.
  • To create bold text, type <b>bolded text</b> (please note the closing tag, </b>).
  • To create italicized text, type <i>italicized text</i> (please note the closing tag, </i>).
  • Proper web addresses will automatically become links.

Latest in Letters to the Editor

  • Re: The Legislature; climate change

    "Thank you many times over for posting the week's N.C. legislative bills passed. Also for the statistics page. Both are very helpful in keeping abreast of the insanity of the radical Republicans in our state government."
    • May 22, 2013
  • Re: Climate change; clean energy

    "Duke, Exxon and the Koch Brothers may be turning up the heat, but they're also investing in political power and public relations (i.e. lies)."
    • May 8, 2013
  • Re: Climate change

    "I have found the climate movement here to be not only alive and well, but growing and gaining momentum."
    • May 1, 2013
  • More »

Facebook Activity

Twitter Activity

Read indyweek's Tweets

Comments

Following what I also agree was a rather one sided article, I am pleased to see comments in support of …

by Helen Needham on Re: Goathouse Refuge (Letters to the Editor)

The Democrats are cheating my kids out of a life of freedom and liberty!

by Sheila Barber on Re: Political reporting; fracking; "Bash the Old Folks" (a McCrory poem) (Letters to the Editor)

© 2013 Indy Week • 302 E. Pettigrew St., Suite 300, Durham, NC 27701 • phone 919-286-1972 • fax 919-286-4274
RSS Feeds | Powered by Foundation