Animal vs. vegetable | Letters to the Editor | Indy Week
Pin It

Animal vs. vegetable 

Your mention of fuel from vegetable waste in the feature on Piedmont Biofuels ("8 Days a Week," Dec. 19) gave the impression that its product is entirely plant-based.

According to Piedmont Biofuels leader Lyle Estill, only a small portion ("several hundred gallons a week") comes from waste vegetable oils, produced at the co-op in Moncure. The bulk ("closer to 25,000 gallons/week"), from the industrial facility in Pittsboro, uses waste chicken fat.

Anyone thinking that they're doing the planet a favor by purchasing biodiesel from Piedmont Biofuels should look a little more closely at it. The confusion over biodiesel feedstocks results directly from information presented by Piedmont Biofuels. With repeated references to plant oils on its main Web pages, and without a specific statement otherwise, the term "multi-feedstock" can easily be assumed to mean different plants. While animal fat is mentioned in Piedmont Biofuels' blogs, the theme of the upfront presentation is sustainability of plant-based energy.

For example, the lead paragraph on the "Our Story" page states: "From the beginning, Piedmont Biofuels has focused on small-scale biodiesel production. Our expertise lies in small reactor design for making fuel out of waste vegetable oil."

Then, the "Education" section touts "Vegetable Oil as Alternative Fuel," with reference to it in a separate pdf file. There are many other examples.

The use of animal feedstocks financially aids the producers of them by providing one more revenue stream, allowing them to avoid disposal costs—whether it is the main item produced or incidental to the production of some other. If you purchase a product, you support its production.

Given the energy-intensive (typically petroleum-based) nature of raising meat, and the inefficiencies of conversion of plant protein to animal protein (with the associated waste of water and land), animal-derived biodiesel is not eco-friendly. If Piedmont Biofuels is earnest about promoting alternatives to an unsustainable energy policy, it seems contradictory that it would formulate animal-based biodiesel.

Joe Regan

Editor's note: The Independent article specifically referred to a tour of the Piedmont Biofuels co-op in Moncure, where vegetable-based biodiesel is produced.

  • Given the energy-intensive nature of raising meat ... animal-derived biodiesel is not eco-friendly. —Joe Regan

Latest in Letters to the Editor

Comments (5)

Showing 1-5 of 5

Add a comment

Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-5 of 5

Add a comment

INDY Week publishes all kinds of comments, but we don't publish everything.

  • Comments that are not contributing to the conversation will be removed.
  • Comments that include ad hominem attacks will also be removed.
  • Please do not copy and paste the full text of a press release.

Permitted HTML:
  • To create paragraphs in your comment, type <p> at the start of a paragraph and </p> at the end of each paragraph.
  • To create bold text, type <b>bolded text</b> (please note the closing tag, </b>).
  • To create italicized text, type <i>italicized text</i> (please note the closing tag, </i>).
  • Proper web addresses will automatically become links.

Latest in Letters to the Editor

Twitter Activity


Thank you cleverweist1 and Cristel Gutshchenritter Orrand for the opportunity to stand up for what I believe in as a …

by half full on A Massive Scar (Letters to the Editor)

Mr Pollock makes some good points .
Noam Chomsky and Ron Paul have similar views on wars we have waged …

by CHHS Tiger on History you won't like either (Letters to the Editor)

Most Read

© 2016 Indy Week • 201 W. Main St., Suite 101, Durham, NC 27701 • phone 919-286-1972 • fax 919-286-4274
RSS Feeds | Powered by Foundation