#$!&ing reviewer | Letters to the Editor | Indy Week
Pin It

#$!&ing reviewer 

Letters to the Editor

Generally, I like Cheshire's far ranging and thoughtful film reviews, but his recent positive one on What the #$!& Do We Know?! (Oct. 20) reveals that he has been suckered by mysticism posturing as science.

Recently, NPR's The State of Things had as guests the filmmaker Mark Vicente along with one of the film's "heavily credentialed scientists" and Michael Shermer, the publisher of Skeptic Magazine. Shermer neatly and knowledgeably demolished the film's claim of conscious subjectivity being related to quantum mechanics as a scientific impossibility. Vincente was glib and disingenuous in defending his film by claiming he "just wanted people to think," and the so-called scientist forcefully supported him with the canard that "the ideas are speculative and anything is possible" (like the film's 36,000-year-old channeled "Goddess," I suppose).

Cheshire goes through the usual obligatory, skeptical disclaimers before embracing the film's "you create your own reality" premise, extolling it as "deeply American" and somehow grounded in Transcendentalism and Pragmatism philosophies (that's as quantum an intellectual leap as anything that takes place in the molecular world). The only transcendent aspect of this film is that it transcends common sense and scientific fact.

Cheshire is unfortunately right in that it seems to be "deeply American" to accept uncritically any slick, entertaining, feel-good film that allows us to create our own reality, i.e., one built on solipsism and self-delusion. Ultimately, the filmmakers are right about one thing: They don't know #$!& about reality.

  • Letters to the Editor

Latest in Letters to the Editor

Comments

Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

INDY Week publishes all kinds of comments, but we don't publish everything.

  • Comments that are not contributing to the conversation will be removed.
  • Comments that include ad hominem attacks will also be removed.
  • Please do not copy and paste the full text of a press release.

Permitted HTML:
  • To create paragraphs in your comment, type <p> at the start of a paragraph and </p> at the end of each paragraph.
  • To create bold text, type <b>bolded text</b> (please note the closing tag, </b>).
  • To create italicized text, type <i>italicized text</i> (please note the closing tag, </i>).
  • Proper web addresses will automatically become links.

Latest in Letters to the Editor



Twitter Activity

Most Recent Comments

If the headline had been: "Is Scott Crawford Better Off Without Standard Food"? The answer would have been a resounding …

by Sue Mixson on Plate Expectations (Letters to the Editor)

Emma Laperruque and your response to this situation have been very unprofessional. Seeing the way both your organization and she …

by TayWoo on Plate Expectations (Letters to the Editor)

Please, Mr. Keen, inform us on what kind of person Hilary Clinton is. But please leave out the innuendo, unsupported …

by GorSun on Smug Revisionism (Letters to the Editor)

Thank you cleverweist1 and Cristel Gutshchenritter Orrand for the opportunity to stand up for what I believe in as a …

by half full on A Massive Scar (Letters to the Editor)

Mr Pollock makes some good points .
Noam Chomsky and Ron Paul have similar views on wars we have waged …

by CHHS Tiger on History you won't like either (Letters to the Editor)

Comments

If the headline had been: "Is Scott Crawford Better Off Without Standard Food"? The answer would have been a resounding …

by Sue Mixson on Plate Expectations (Letters to the Editor)

Emma Laperruque and your response to this situation have been very unprofessional. Seeing the way both your organization and she …

by TayWoo on Plate Expectations (Letters to the Editor)

Most Read

  1. Off Season (Peripheral Visions)
  2. Tu Quoque (Letters to the Editor)

© 2017 Indy Week • 201 W. Main St., Suite 101, Durham, NC 27701 • phone 919-286-1972 • fax 919-286-4274
RSS Feeds | Powered by Foundation