Ag-Mart case still hanging | North Carolina | Indy Week
Pin It

Ag-Mart case still hanging 

After a day-long hearing, the N.C. Pesticide Board ruled Jan. 8 that it still needs more time to decide the Ag-Mart case, which is becoming more complex with each legal proceeding.

"This record is huge; point us in the right direction," said board member Lisa Corbett, at the end of the meeting.

Prompted by the Environmental Protection Agency, the N.C. Department of Agriculture began investigating Ag-Mart three years ago, after several of its employees in the southeastern part of the state gave birth to severely deformed babies in late 2004 and early 2005. The Florida-based tomato grower contested the fines—$184,500, the largest ever levied by the NCDA, for 369 violations of state pesticide laws—and the case went to the Pesticide Board.

On Jan. 8, the board asked lawyers for Ag-Mart and the state to submit more information; meanwhile, the board will continue to do legal research. The next hearing is Feb. 12.

Ag-Mart has denied accusations it exposed its workers to pesticides.

The board previously referred the case to the Office of Administrative Hearings because members said it was too complicated to handle. Yet after two administrative law hearings, the board is re-reviewing it.

The final decision rests with the board, a seven-member group appointed by the governor.

Two administrative law judges earlier recommended that the board dismiss 17 of the 369 charges and reduce the fine to $6,000. The judges determined the state attorney general's office used flawed company documents, rather than farm workers' testimony, as the backbone of its case.

Mark Ash and Mitch Armbruster, lawyers for Ag-Mart, one of the nation's largest tomato growers, argued that the board should accept the administrative judges' recommendations.

"The facts in this particular matter have been reviewed by two administrative law judges and the same facts were reviewed by an administrative law judge in Florida. And in each case the judges found that the claims were just wrong," Ash said.

However, the state attorney general's office contested the judges' recommendations.

Barry Bloch, assistant attorney general who argued for the state, said Judge Beryl Wade, now retired, should have used board rules, not administrative hearings rules, in making recommendations.

Bloch also objected to the ruling of Judge Joe Webster. "Judge Webster had never appeared before this board or received a case as an administrative law judge. He is perfectly competent as an attorney, but his recommendations on this count demonstrate he does not see the whole picture."

No farm workers attended the hearing, which was largely mired in legal jargon and procedural minutiae.

"The case has become a procedural quagmire, and not one time today did we hear anything about farm workers," said Fawn Pattison, director of the N.C. Agricultural Resources Center. "That's how far we are from the facts of the case."

More by Mosi Secret

Comments

Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

INDY Week publishes all kinds of comments, but we don't publish everything.

  • Comments that are not contributing to the conversation will be removed.
  • Comments that include ad hominem attacks will also be removed.
  • Please do not copy and paste the full text of a press release.

Permitted HTML:
  • To create paragraphs in your comment, type <p> at the start of a paragraph and </p> at the end of each paragraph.
  • To create bold text, type <b>bolded text</b> (please note the closing tag, </b>).
  • To create italicized text, type <i>italicized text</i> (please note the closing tag, </i>).
  • Proper web addresses will automatically become links.

Latest in North Carolina



Twitter Activity

Most Recent Comments

WRAL.com estimated that the loss was about $500M, which is less than .001 (1/10 of 1%) of …

by John Trololo on How Much Has HB 2 Cost North Carolina? As Much as $395 Million—and Counting. (North Carolina)

You can't lose what you never had. The ACC will lose when it's fans don't leave to the state to …

by Barbara 2 on How Much Has HB 2 Cost North Carolina? As Much as $395 Million—and Counting. (North Carolina)

How much tax money has McCory spent on lawyers trying to defend the UN-defendable....McCory is an idiot a moron....anything but …

by Tony D on North Carolina Tried to Defend HB 2 in Federal Court. It Didn’t Go Well. (North Carolina)

I would love a decent fixer upper mobile home to make into my very own Work /Craft Shop. I love …

by Kaybird on Abandoned mobile homes plague North Carolina (North Carolina)

Should a judge be allowed to be reelected by a retention vote if he or she had not been first …

by Doug Johnston on The Quiet Battle for the N.C. Supreme Court Matters More Than You Think (North Carolina)

Comments

WRAL.com estimated that the loss was about $500M, which is less than .001 (1/10 of 1%) of …

by John Trololo on How Much Has HB 2 Cost North Carolina? As Much as $395 Million—and Counting. (North Carolina)

You can't lose what you never had. The ACC will lose when it's fans don't leave to the state to …

by Barbara 2 on How Much Has HB 2 Cost North Carolina? As Much as $395 Million—and Counting. (North Carolina)

© 2016 Indy Week • 201 W. Main St., Suite 101, Durham, NC 27701 • phone 919-286-1972 • fax 919-286-4274
RSS Feeds | Powered by Foundation