After 751 South, Durham rewriting rules on sewer and water service | Durham County | Indy Week
Pin It

After 751 South, Durham rewriting rules on sewer and water service 

Council vote on revised rules Monday

After the last dustup over water and sewer service to the controversial 751 South development, the City of Durham is revamping how it provides utilities to projects outside the city limits.

If city council approves rule changes proposed by the city Department of Planning next week, developers will have to fulfill new requirements if they want city-provided sewer and water: They must apply for and accept annexation into the city. And they must submit to a zoning review.

The new guidelines will streamline what is currently a disjointed process, says City Planning Director Steve Medlin. Under the current rules, requests to the city for the extension of utility service and annexation are handled by several departments and presented to the council separately.

By considering the requests at different points in the process, council members could conceivably approve the extension of utilities service to a development project, and then later decline to annex it. That would force the city to maintain the service with no additional tax revenue to pay for it.

The new rules ensure that the annexation, utility extension and rezoning applications are all presented to the city council at one time. In other words, sewer and water service is incumbent on annexation.

"These new rules bring the process together, so that the council has all the pieces in front of them and can make the best upfront decision," Medlin says.

Revisions to the process come three months after Southern Durham Development, which is building 751 South, tried to circumvent city policy by going to the Legislature. In June, state lawmakers considered, but ultimately rejected, legislation that would have forced Durham to extend utilities to the 167-acre project in the environmentally sensitive Jordan Lake watershed.

This maneuver was in response to city council's earlier rejection of the company's application to have city water and sewer lines extended to the proposed 1,300-home subdivision that will include 600,000 square feet of commercial space.

Asked if the controversy motivated the city to revisit its process for approving such applications, Medlin says, "Certainly that was a contributing factor," adding that recent moves by the General Assembly require the city to have stricter rules for annexing properties.

With the pending revisions, the city is revisiting several applications for annexation and utilities, Medlin says. One of the applications in the hopper was submitted by 751 LLC. The Florida-based company wants to build Southpoint Trails, a 169-townhome subdivision set on 27 acres. Like the 751 South project, it hugs N.C. 751 Highway and Stagecoach Road about three miles from Jordan Lake.

According to a 2011 article in the Triangle Business Journal, owner and former Chicago developer Jeff Gelman, through 751 LLC, bought five parcels for about $3.1 million in 2006.

Local attorney Ken Spaulding, who's been retained by the developers as counsel, says he doesn't expect any fallout from the controversy over 751 South. "I expect the city council to make a decision based on the merits of the application, which was submitted in a way totally consistent with the newly proposed policy," Spaulding says.

Medlin declines to speculate on the planning department's recommendation about Southpoint Trails to city council.

A final decision by council on the 751 LLC application won't be scheduled until after the city council takes up the proposed rule changes. A council vote on the revised rules is set for Monday, Oct. 15.

This article appeared in print with the headline "Utility players."

Comments

Showing 1-1 of 1

Add a comment

 
Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-1 of 1

Add a comment

INDY Week publishes all kinds of comments, but we don't publish everything.

  • Comments that are not contributing to the conversation will be removed.
  • Comments that include ad hominem attacks will also be removed.
  • Please do not copy and paste the full text of a press release.

Permitted HTML:
  • To create paragraphs in your comment, type <p> at the start of a paragraph and </p> at the end of each paragraph.
  • To create bold text, type <b>bolded text</b> (please note the closing tag, </b>).
  • To create italicized text, type <i>italicized text</i> (please note the closing tag, </i>).
  • Proper web addresses will automatically become links.

Latest in Durham County



Twitter Activity

Most Recent Comments

I will never, ever live in another neighborhood that has an HOA. It's not even up for debate.
I already …

by mike_in_nc on Does North Carolina give homeowners associations too much power? (Durham County)

I would not buy or invest in a development that did not have an HOA. That after having made the …

by 669283 on Does North Carolina give homeowners associations too much power? (Durham County)

I've never lived in a house built more recently than 1976, so I have no personal experience with HOAs. I …

by David 1 on Does North Carolina give homeowners associations too much power? (Durham County)

Why any home buyer would voluntarily want another layer of bureaucratic control upon them, by buying into an HOA....just say …

by Michael Gary on Does North Carolina give homeowners associations too much power? (Durham County)

Comments

I will never, ever live in another neighborhood that has an HOA. It's not even up for debate.
I already …

by mike_in_nc on Does North Carolina give homeowners associations too much power? (Durham County)

I would not buy or invest in a development that did not have an HOA. That after having made the …

by 669283 on Does North Carolina give homeowners associations too much power? (Durham County)

© 2016 Indy Week • 201 W. Main St., Suite 101, Durham, NC 27701 • phone 919-286-1972 • fax 919-286-4274
RSS Feeds | Powered by Foundation