<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>








































































  <rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <channel>
      <title>Comments On: Meeting tonight: The new Raleigh zoning code and the problem of accessory dwelling units
    
      by Bob Geary</title>
      <link>http://www.indyweek.com/citizen/archives/2012/08/27/meeting-tonight-the-new-raleigh-zoning-code-and-the-problem-of-accessory-dwelling-units</link>
      <atom:link href="http://www.indyweek.com/indyweek/Rss.xml?oid=3134018&amp;id=comments" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />      <description>Comments On: Meeting tonight: The new Raleigh zoning code and the problem of accessory dwelling units
    
      by Bob Geary</description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <copyright>Copyright 2013 Indy Week. All rights reserved. This RSS file is offered to individuals, Indy Week readers, and non-commercial organizations only. Any commercial websites wishing to use this RSS file, please contact Indy Week.</copyright>
      <webMaster>pweber@indyweek.com (Indy Week Webmaster)</webMaster>
      <pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 00:00:01 -0400</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 17:45:00 -0400</lastBuildDate>
      <generator>Foundation</generator>
      <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
      
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Meeting tonight: The new Raleigh zoning code and the problem of accessory dwelling units]]></title>

    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.indyweek.com/citizen/archives/2012/08/27/meeting-tonight-the-new-raleigh-zoning-code-and-the-problem-of-accessory-dwelling-units/#3135498]]></link>

    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.indyweek.com/citizen/archives/2012/08/27/meeting-tonight-the-new-raleigh-zoning-code-and-the-problem-of-accessory-dwelling-units/#3135498]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[Adam Chasen]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[Wow, that is about the most single-sided/biased post I have read in a long time, and this is an election year.<br>
<br>
It seems whenever anything new comes up (food trucks, ADUs, etc.) that we *already* have laws on the books (sound ordinances, PROP, electrical/plumbing/building codes) which address nearly all of the concerns by detractors.<br>
<br>
As your property values increase and fewer houses are on the market closer to our wonderful downtown, accessibility to *purchase* a house decreases. There are an increasing number of families who rent because there decreasing opportunities to own closer to downtown.<br>
<br>
I will pull a few things from:<br>
Accessory Dwelling Units: Case Study<br>
Department of Housing and Urban Development<br>
Office of Policy Development and Research<br>
<a href="http://www.huduser.org/portal/publications/adu.pdf" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://www.huduser.org/portal/publications&hellip;</a><br>
<br>
Provide practical housing options for:<br>
* elderly<br>
* disabled<br>
* empty nesters<br>
* young workers<br>
<br>
Provide options to homeowners to invest more in their property (think property values):<br>
* rental income for homeowners (offset mortgage)<br>
* do not require the extra expense of purchasing land<br>
* converting existing structures<br>
* little additional infrastructure<br>
<br>
Direct quote:<br>
They are an inexpensive way for municipalities to increase their housing supply, while also increasing their property tax base.
        
        <br />
        Posted by 
        
          <a href="http://www.indyweek.com/indyweek/Profile?oid=3135497">Adam Chasen</a>]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2012 11:52:28 -0400</pubDate>
    <source url="http://www.indyweek.com">Indy Week</source>
  </item>
        
      
    </channel>
  </rss>



