http://www.indyweek.com/triangulator/archives/2012/05/01/woodard-election-paperwork-was-sent-but-not-received Comments On: Woodard: Election paperwork was sent, but not received by Joe Schwartz en-us Copyright 2013 Indy Week. All rights reserved. This RSS file is offered to individuals, Indy Week readers, and non-commercial organizations only. Any commercial websites wishing to use this RSS file, please contact Indy Week. pweber@indyweek.com (Indy Week Webmaster) Sun, 19 May 2013 00:00:01 -0400 Sun, 19 May 2013 13:00:00 -0400 Foundation http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss I agree with you. My disagreement was w/ Mr. Cubbison's comparison of the N&O and Independent articles as contradictory, which they were not.
Posted by Cyndi Bunn]]> Wed, 02 May 2012 08:54:57 -0400 Indy Week
Posted by jackd]]> Tue, 01 May 2012 16:56:50 -0400 Indy Week Posted by Lainey Edmisten]]> Tue, 01 May 2012 15:56:31 -0400 Indy Week The 1st-quarter financial report is an entirely different document and was filed before the 5p.m. deadline yesterday.
Posted by Cyndi Bunn]]> Tue, 01 May 2012 15:14:06 -0400 Indy Week "He said he did file the his committee's first-quarter financial report before the postmark deadline of 5 p.m. today."

Neither of those comments say he sent it in February.
Posted by Will Cubbison]]> Tue, 01 May 2012 14:52:37 -0400 Indy Week In what way is this explanation different from what Woodard said yesterday? Acc'g to the N&O link, he said he'd sent the info on time.
Posted by Cyndi Bunn]]> Tue, 01 May 2012 14:39:33 -0400 Indy Week http://projects.newsobserver.com/under_the…

Lots of questions, different answers from him.
Posted by Will Cubbison]]> Tue, 01 May 2012 14:32:01 -0400 Indy Week