<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>








































































  <rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <channel>
      <title>Comments On: The DOMA Monitor</title>
      <link>http://www.indyweek.com/indyweek/the-doma-monitor/Content?oid=2884998</link>
      <atom:link href="http://www.indyweek.com/indyweek/Rss.xml?oid=2884998&amp;id=comments" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />      <description>Comments On: The DOMA Monitor</description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <copyright>Copyright 2013 Indy Week. All rights reserved. This RSS file is offered to individuals, Indy Week readers, and non-commercial organizations only. Any commercial websites wishing to use this RSS file, please contact Indy Week.</copyright>
      <webMaster>pweber@indyweek.com (Indy Week Webmaster)</webMaster>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 00:00:01 -0400</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 16:30:00 -0400</lastBuildDate>
      <generator>Foundation</generator>
      <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
      
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: The DOMA Monitor]]></title>

    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.indyweek.com/indyweek/the-doma-monitor/Content?oid=2884998&show=comments#2925598]]></link>

    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.indyweek.com/indyweek/the-doma-monitor/Content?oid=2884998&show=comments#2925598]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[mrdave]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[Thanks you for your clarification, such as it is.<br>
<br>
Apology rescinded.
        
        <br />
        Posted by 
        
          <a href="http://www.indyweek.com/indyweek/Profile?oid=1229481">mrdave</a>]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2012 09:26:29 -0400</pubDate>
    <source url="http://www.indyweek.com">Indy Week</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: The DOMA Monitor]]></title>

    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.indyweek.com/indyweek/the-doma-monitor/Content?oid=2884998&show=comments#2922104]]></link>

    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.indyweek.com/indyweek/the-doma-monitor/Content?oid=2884998&show=comments#2922104]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[brentf777]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[My position is simply this. The state shouldn't be involved in marriage.
        
        <br />
        Posted by 
        
          <a href="http://www.indyweek.com/indyweek/Profile?oid=1226989">brentf777</a>]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2012 11:10:45 -0400</pubDate>
    <source url="http://www.indyweek.com">Indy Week</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: The DOMA Monitor]]></title>

    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.indyweek.com/indyweek/the-doma-monitor/Content?oid=2884998&show=comments#2919825]]></link>

    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.indyweek.com/indyweek/the-doma-monitor/Content?oid=2884998&show=comments#2919825]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[mrdave]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA["However, given the State refuses to seriously consider this third way alternative, this amendment is the only way to prevent a out of control judiciary from ignoring our existing laws and forcing their will upon us."<br>
<br>
A little clarification please. I may be reading this wrong, but it sounds like you're saying something like, "Although we can not achieve our larger goal of ending the state's involvement in marriage, this amendment might allow us to at least prevent some people from marrying."
        
        <br />
        Posted by 
        
          <a href="http://www.indyweek.com/indyweek/Profile?oid=1229481">mrdave</a>]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2012 15:59:28 -0400</pubDate>
    <source url="http://www.indyweek.com">Indy Week</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: The DOMA Monitor]]></title>

    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.indyweek.com/indyweek/the-doma-monitor/Content?oid=2884998&show=comments#2918970]]></link>

    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.indyweek.com/indyweek/the-doma-monitor/Content?oid=2884998&show=comments#2918970]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[brentf777]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[The Wake County Libertarian Party's stance as outlined above is not properly classified as "against". A true Libertarian opposes State sanctioning of gay marriage AND straight marriage alike.
        
        <br />
        Posted by 
        
          <a href="http://www.indyweek.com/indyweek/Profile?oid=1226989">brentf777</a>]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2012 13:19:18 -0400</pubDate>
    <source url="http://www.indyweek.com">Indy Week</source>
  </item>
        
      
    </channel>
  </rss>



