<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>








































































  <rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <channel>
      <title>Comments On: The deceptive arguments for the Defense of Marriage Amendment
    
      by Jonathan Weiler</title>
      <link>http://www.indyweek.com/indyweek/the-deceptive-arguments-for-the-defense-of-marriage-amendment/Content?oid=2793683</link>
      <atom:link href="http://www.indyweek.com/indyweek/Rss.xml?oid=2793683&amp;id=comments" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />      <description>Comments On: The deceptive arguments for the Defense of Marriage Amendment
    
      by Jonathan Weiler</description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <copyright>Copyright 2013 Indy Week. All rights reserved. This RSS file is offered to individuals, Indy Week readers, and non-commercial organizations only. Any commercial websites wishing to use this RSS file, please contact Indy Week.</copyright>
      <webMaster>pweber@indyweek.com (Indy Week Webmaster)</webMaster>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 00:00:01 -0400</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 16:30:00 -0400</lastBuildDate>
      <generator>Foundation</generator>
      <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
      
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: The deceptive arguments for the Defense of Marriage Amendment]]></title>

    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.indyweek.com/indyweek/the-deceptive-arguments-for-the-defense-of-marriage-amendment/Content?oid=2793683&show=comments#2812343]]></link>

    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.indyweek.com/indyweek/the-deceptive-arguments-for-the-defense-of-marriage-amendment/Content?oid=2793683&show=comments#2812343]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[Steve Bocckino]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[Great column! <br>
<br>
The anti-marriage amendment is just one more cynical and nasty attempt by the Republicans in the legislature to turn out a few votes.
        
        <br />
        Posted by 
        
          <a href="http://www.indyweek.com/indyweek/Profile?oid=1229250">Steve Bocckino</a>]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 23:45:29 -0500</pubDate>
    <source url="http://www.indyweek.com">Indy Week</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: The deceptive arguments for the Defense of Marriage Amendment]]></title>

    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.indyweek.com/indyweek/the-deceptive-arguments-for-the-defense-of-marriage-amendment/Content?oid=2793683&show=comments#2810650]]></link>

    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.indyweek.com/indyweek/the-deceptive-arguments-for-the-defense-of-marriage-amendment/Content?oid=2793683&show=comments#2810650]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[as400_guru]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[Homosexual men and women have the exact same rights to marriage as hetrosexual men and women. They are EXACTLY the same.
        
        <br />
        Posted by 
        
          <a href="http://www.indyweek.com/indyweek/Profile?oid=1491723">as400_guru</a>]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 12:52:24 -0500</pubDate>
    <source url="http://www.indyweek.com">Indy Week</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: The deceptive arguments for the Defense of Marriage Amendment]]></title>

    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.indyweek.com/indyweek/the-deceptive-arguments-for-the-defense-of-marriage-amendment/Content?oid=2793683&show=comments#2804475]]></link>

    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.indyweek.com/indyweek/the-deceptive-arguments-for-the-defense-of-marriage-amendment/Content?oid=2793683&show=comments#2804475]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[Jerry Salak]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[Another harmful effect of the legislation would be the message it would send to children. We often forget that people discover their sexuality as young, vulnerable children - regardless of whether they are gay or straight.
        
        <br />
        Posted by 
        
          <a href="http://www.indyweek.com/indyweek/Profile?oid=2804474">Jerry Salak</a>]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 12:33:11 -0500</pubDate>
    <source url="http://www.indyweek.com">Indy Week</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: The deceptive arguments for the Defense of Marriage Amendment]]></title>

    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.indyweek.com/indyweek/the-deceptive-arguments-for-the-defense-of-marriage-amendment/Content?oid=2793683&show=comments#2801412]]></link>

    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.indyweek.com/indyweek/the-deceptive-arguments-for-the-defense-of-marriage-amendment/Content?oid=2793683&show=comments#2801412]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[Rataplan]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[It’s not surprising, given the current trailer-park concept of marriage in the country (and watching our Hollywood heroes’ couplings and dissolutions, such as Britney Spears/Jason Allen Alexander, Dennis Rodman/Carmen Electra, Jennifer Lopez and a cast of dozens, Kim Kardashian/Kris Humphries and Demi Moore and an increasingly younger set of husbands) that the in-crowd might have a twisted sense of what entails traditional marriage.<br>
Most of the rest of us who have jobs, house and car payments (into which we put $4/gallon fuel), grocery and medical bills, pay insurance and increasingly high taxes, buy groceries, clothes for the wife and kids and watch our public universities raise tuition semi-annually and must decide if we should rob a bank to pay for it all or hope to hit the Education Lotto are mystified (a) why anyone would choose to join our happy group or (b) why we should give up what little respect we have for the institution of marriage by changing the game plan to allow non-traditional life-stylers to reap what few benefits we receive for being members of the club.<br>
Marriage is mostly a special deal for people who have committed themselves to one another for a lifetime (well, at least those are the traditional words) and it almost always involves a man and a woman who anticipate loving and caring for one another “until death do us part.” Some take that literally when things get bleak and take things into their own hands, but the majority of us believe we’ll ride things out for better or worse to the end of the string. Marriage for any society interested in preserving itself also usually involves children we will produce, small persons we will love, nurture and try to instruct in how to live good and decent lives and be kind to others.
        
        <br />
        Posted by 
        
          <a href="http://www.indyweek.com/indyweek/Profile?oid=2643851">Rataplan</a>]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 17:02:22 -0500</pubDate>
    <source url="http://www.indyweek.com">Indy Week</source>
  </item>
        
      
    </channel>
  </rss>



