<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>








































































  <rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <channel>
      <title>Comments On: The devil is in the details on Chatham pipeline
    
      by Joe Schwartz</title>
      <link>http://www.indyweek.com/indyweek/the-devil-is-in-the-details-on-chatham-pipeline/Content?oid=2065513</link>
      <atom:link href="http://www.indyweek.com/indyweek/Rss.xml?oid=2065513&amp;id=comments" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />      <description>Comments On: The devil is in the details on Chatham pipeline
    
      by Joe Schwartz</description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <copyright>Copyright 2013 Indy Week. All rights reserved. This RSS file is offered to individuals, Indy Week readers, and non-commercial organizations only. Any commercial websites wishing to use this RSS file, please contact Indy Week.</copyright>
      <webMaster>pweber@indyweek.com (Indy Week Webmaster)</webMaster>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 00:00:01 -0400</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 03:45:00 -0400</lastBuildDate>
      <generator>Foundation</generator>
      <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
      
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: The devil is in the details on Chatham pipeline]]></title>

    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.indyweek.com/indyweek/the-devil-is-in-the-details-on-chatham-pipeline/Content?oid=2065513&show=comments#2093409]]></link>

    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.indyweek.com/indyweek/the-devil-is-in-the-details-on-chatham-pipeline/Content?oid=2065513&show=comments#2093409]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[sheesh]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[Your response is a true reflection of your recent behavior. First of all you can deny your behavior all you want, but to see an elected official elevate her voice, cry, and behave like a child is embarrassing to everyone except apparently you.
        
        <br />
        Posted by 
        
          sheesh]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2011 15:22:00 -0500</pubDate>
    <source url="http://www.indyweek.com">Indy Week</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: The devil is in the details on Chatham pipeline]]></title>

    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.indyweek.com/indyweek/the-devil-is-in-the-details-on-chatham-pipeline/Content?oid=2065513&show=comments#2078769]]></link>

    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.indyweek.com/indyweek/the-devil-is-in-the-details-on-chatham-pipeline/Content?oid=2065513&show=comments#2078769]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[Sam Cherry]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[It certainly would help me.  Today, I just recieved my scoping study from the soil scientist and the only place I can build an acceptable sepitic system (class v) is right where the WWP pipline will go through my property. I hope the commissioners were  truthful when one of them quoted to me that if this was the case that WWP would make it right.
        
        <br />
        Posted by 
        
          <a href="http://www.indyweek.com/indyweek/Profile?oid=2078768">Sam Cherry</a>]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 26 Feb 2011 16:16:10 -0500</pubDate>
    <source url="http://www.indyweek.com">Indy Week</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: The devil is in the details on Chatham pipeline]]></title>

    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.indyweek.com/indyweek/the-devil-is-in-the-details-on-chatham-pipeline/Content?oid=2065513&show=comments#2076596]]></link>

    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.indyweek.com/indyweek/the-devil-is-in-the-details-on-chatham-pipeline/Content?oid=2065513&show=comments#2076596]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[Joe Schwartz, Indy Staff Writer]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[Thanks to all for the discussion here. Addressing your concerns:<br>
<br>
@rightofchatham I appreciate you bringing up the CCEDC resolution, which, for others, can be found here: <a href="http://www.chathamedc.org/sites/default/files/page-files/WWP%20Resolution.pdf" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://www.chathamedc.org/sites/default/fi&hellip;</a><br>
<br>
 If you read the entire resolution, it states that the commission supports WWP's request to place the pipeline in Chatham but also adds that, "The Chatham County Commissioners are further supported and encouraged in their endeavors to negotiate, in good faith, the most effective benefits to the residents of Chatham County from this approval."<br>
<br>
Starkweather takes issue not with the pipeline being approved, but with the conditions, concessions if you prefer, that were negotiated as part of the deal.
        
        <br />
        Posted by 
        
          <a href="http://www.indyweek.com/indyweek/Profile?oid=1230069">Joe Schwartz, Indy Staff Writer</a>]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2011 23:36:00 -0500</pubDate>
    <source url="http://www.indyweek.com">Indy Week</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: The devil is in the details on Chatham pipeline]]></title>

    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.indyweek.com/indyweek/the-devil-is-in-the-details-on-chatham-pipeline/Content?oid=2065513&show=comments#2076316]]></link>

    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.indyweek.com/indyweek/the-devil-is-in-the-details-on-chatham-pipeline/Content?oid=2065513&show=comments#2076316]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[Dr M!ke]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[Interesting map... <br>
<br>
It suggested the Two for One proposal, where the sewage pipe from the sewage facility draining into the Cape Fear River is routed (for maximum construction cost savings) under the Shearon Harris Nuclear plant, allowing them, also, to add a hook-up in the future.
        
        <br />
        Posted by 
        
          <a href="http://www.indyweek.com/indyweek/Profile?oid=1225317">Dr M!ke</a>]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2011 22:02:58 -0500</pubDate>
    <source url="http://www.indyweek.com">Indy Week</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: The devil is in the details on Chatham pipeline]]></title>

    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.indyweek.com/indyweek/the-devil-is-in-the-details-on-chatham-pipeline/Content?oid=2065513&show=comments#2073638]]></link>

    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.indyweek.com/indyweek/the-devil-is-in-the-details-on-chatham-pipeline/Content?oid=2065513&show=comments#2073638]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[Karl]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[I've attended a number of the Cary Chatham Joint meetings as a Cary resident, and Ms. Kost and Mr. Lucier fought professionally and respectfully to prevent Cary from increasing developer profits at the cost of severely downgrading Jordan Lake and increasing the future costs of obtaining clean drinking water (think Falls Lake and its $100 million price tag for cleaning) for Chatham (and Cary). Your new commissioners are allowing short-term political contributions raise Chatham's future costs of serving its people.
        
        <br />
        Posted by 
        
          <a href="http://www.indyweek.com/indyweek/Profile?oid=1226650">Karl</a>]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2011 13:45:34 -0500</pubDate>
    <source url="http://www.indyweek.com">Indy Week</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: The devil is in the details on Chatham pipeline]]></title>

    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.indyweek.com/indyweek/the-devil-is-in-the-details-on-chatham-pipeline/Content?oid=2065513&show=comments#2071762]]></link>

    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.indyweek.com/indyweek/the-devil-is-in-the-details-on-chatham-pipeline/Content?oid=2065513&show=comments#2071762]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[SallyKost]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[Okay - let's first clarify the whole changing the minutes thing.......You, whoever you are, don't have the facts. When I served on the Cary/Chatham committee, I had along the way always said that we need to have design standards in place when the plan goes out to the public.
        
        <br />
        Posted by 
        
          <a href="http://www.indyweek.com/indyweek/Profile?oid=1414314">SallyKost</a>]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2011 11:05:08 -0500</pubDate>
    <source url="http://www.indyweek.com">Indy Week</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: The devil is in the details on Chatham pipeline]]></title>

    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.indyweek.com/indyweek/the-devil-is-in-the-details-on-chatham-pipeline/Content?oid=2065513&show=comments#2071761]]></link>

    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.indyweek.com/indyweek/the-devil-is-in-the-details-on-chatham-pipeline/Content?oid=2065513&show=comments#2071761]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[shellyslaw]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[Interesting reporting Mr. Schwartz. Quite a bit of it was true as well, including the storming out of the room like a child in a tantrum by Mr. Barnes.
        
        <br />
        Posted by 
        
          <a href="http://www.indyweek.com/indyweek/Profile?oid=2071760">shellyslaw</a>]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2011 11:04:25 -0500</pubDate>
    <source url="http://www.indyweek.com">Indy Week</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: The devil is in the details on Chatham pipeline]]></title>

    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.indyweek.com/indyweek/the-devil-is-in-the-details-on-chatham-pipeline/Content?oid=2065513&show=comments#2069378]]></link>

    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.indyweek.com/indyweek/the-devil-is-in-the-details-on-chatham-pipeline/Content?oid=2065513&show=comments#2069378]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[rightofchatham]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[What is fascinating to me about the "reporting" Mr. Schwartz provides is that Mr Starkweather is quoted here as a member of the CCEDC, yet there is no mention of the EDC Resolution IN SUPPORT of cooperation with WWP. Seems to me very misleading that the Indy misrepresents Mr. Starweather, as he speaks for himself on this issue and not in agreement with the CCEDC.
        
        <br />
        Posted by 
        
          rightofchatham]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Feb 2011 19:06:58 -0500</pubDate>
    <source url="http://www.indyweek.com">Indy Week</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: The devil is in the details on Chatham pipeline]]></title>

    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.indyweek.com/indyweek/the-devil-is-in-the-details-on-chatham-pipeline/Content?oid=2065513&show=comments#2069308]]></link>

    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.indyweek.com/indyweek/the-devil-is-in-the-details-on-chatham-pipeline/Content?oid=2065513&show=comments#2069308]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[sheesh]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[Just wanted to put a few things into the record here. First, Sally did attend the meeting and though no public input was taken, she offered it anyway and was reprimanded several times for doing so.
        
        <br />
        Posted by 
        
          sheesh]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Feb 2011 18:52:22 -0500</pubDate>
    <source url="http://www.indyweek.com">Indy Week</source>
  </item>
        
      
    </channel>
  </rss>



