<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>








































































  <rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <channel>
      <title>Comments On: Haw River Assembly survey says Jordan Lake is &apos;6,200 feet upstream&apos;
    
      by Matt Salda&amp;ntilde;a</title>
      <link>http://www.indyweek.com/triangulator/archives/2009/06/29/haw-river-assembly-survey-says-jordan-lake-is-6200-feet-upstream</link>
      <atom:link href="http://www.indyweek.com/indyweek/Rss.xml?oid=1275354&amp;id=comments" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />      <description>Comments On: Haw River Assembly survey says Jordan Lake is &apos;6,200 feet upstream&apos;
    
      by Matt Salda&amp;ntilde;a</description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <copyright>Copyright 2013 Indy Week. All rights reserved. This RSS file is offered to individuals, Indy Week readers, and non-commercial organizations only. Any commercial websites wishing to use this RSS file, please contact Indy Week.</copyright>
      <webMaster>pweber@indyweek.com (Indy Week Webmaster)</webMaster>
      <pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 00:00:01 -0400</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 16:00:00 -0400</lastBuildDate>
      <generator>Foundation</generator>
      <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
      
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Haw River Assembly survey says Jordan Lake is '6,200 feet upstream']]></title>

    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.indyweek.com/triangulator/archives/2009/06/29/haw-river-assembly-survey-says-jordan-lake-is-6200-feet-upstream/#1277672]]></link>

    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.indyweek.com/triangulator/archives/2009/06/29/haw-river-assembly-survey-says-jordan-lake-is-6200-feet-upstream/#1277672]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[Jordan Lake Survey/Rezoning Summary &laquo; Downing Creek Community Association]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[[x] http://www.indyweekblogs.com/triangulator/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/new-hope-creek-report.pdf; see also the news article at: http://www.indyweekblogs.com/triangulator/2009/06/29/haw-river-assembly-survey-says-jordan-lake-is-6...
        
        <br />
        Posted by 
        
          Jordan Lake Survey/Rezoning Summary &laquo; Downing Creek Community Association]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 21:05:31 -0500</pubDate>
    <source url="http://www.indyweek.com">Indy Week</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Haw River Assembly survey says Jordan Lake is '6,200 feet upstream']]></title>

    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.indyweek.com/triangulator/archives/2009/06/29/haw-river-assembly-survey-says-jordan-lake-is-6200-feet-upstream/#1277784]]></link>

    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.indyweek.com/triangulator/archives/2009/06/29/haw-river-assembly-survey-says-jordan-lake-is-6200-feet-upstream/#1277784]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[Environmental group seeks to intervene in Jordan Lake lawsuit; DWQ gives mixed messages - Triangulator - Indy Week Blogs]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[164-acre project outside the lake&rsquo;s protected area. Later that month, the Haw River Assembly released its own survey and hydrologist&rsquo;s report that found the project was closer to the lake than on current maps, and within the half-mile [...]
        
        <br />
        Posted by 
        
          Environmental group seeks to intervene in Jordan Lake lawsuit; DWQ gives mixed messages - Triangulator - Indy Week Blogs]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 13:56:17 -0400</pubDate>
    <source url="http://www.indyweek.com">Indy Week</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Haw River Assembly survey says Jordan Lake is '6,200 feet upstream']]></title>

    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.indyweek.com/triangulator/archives/2009/06/29/haw-river-assembly-survey-says-jordan-lake-is-6200-feet-upstream/#1277870]]></link>

    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.indyweek.com/triangulator/archives/2009/06/29/haw-river-assembly-survey-says-jordan-lake-is-6200-feet-upstream/#1277870]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[Liz Pullman]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[The edge of the permanent pool of Jordan Lake has been pinpointed !!!! The 216 ft. elevation IS where it IS, not where those developers want it to be.
        
        <br />
        Posted by 
        
          Liz Pullman]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 12:40:56 -0400</pubDate>
    <source url="http://www.indyweek.com">Indy Week</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Haw River Assembly survey says Jordan Lake is '6,200 feet upstream']]></title>

    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.indyweek.com/triangulator/archives/2009/06/29/haw-river-assembly-survey-says-jordan-lake-is-6200-feet-upstream/#1276891]]></link>

    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.indyweek.com/triangulator/archives/2009/06/29/haw-river-assembly-survey-says-jordan-lake-is-6200-feet-upstream/#1276891]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[Steve Bocckino]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[Will Durham County BOCC cave into the developers' lawsuit or will they evaluate the HRA survey? Seems like a test of spine to me.
        
        <br />
        Posted by 
        
          <a href="http://www.indyweek.com/indyweek/Profile?oid=1229250">Steve Bocckino</a>]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 16:03:02 -0400</pubDate>
    <source url="http://www.indyweek.com">Indy Week</source>
  </item>
        
      
    </channel>
  </rss>



