<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>








































































  <rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <channel>
      <title>Comments On: Anti-muni broadband bill is back
    
      by Fiona Morgan</title>
      <link>http://www.indyweek.com/triangulator/archives/2009/03/30/anti-muni-broadband-bill-is-back</link>
      <atom:link href="http://www.indyweek.com/indyweek/Rss.xml?oid=1275234&amp;id=comments" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />      <description>Comments On: Anti-muni broadband bill is back
    
      by Fiona Morgan</description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <copyright>Copyright 2013 Indy Week. All rights reserved. This RSS file is offered to individuals, Indy Week readers, and non-commercial organizations only. Any commercial websites wishing to use this RSS file, please contact Indy Week.</copyright>
      <webMaster>pweber@indyweek.com (Indy Week Webmaster)</webMaster>
      <pubDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 00:00:01 -0400</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 02:15:00 -0400</lastBuildDate>
      <generator>Foundation</generator>
      <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
      
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Anti-muni broadband bill is back]]></title>

    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.indyweek.com/triangulator/archives/2009/03/30/anti-muni-broadband-bill-is-back/#1277112]]></link>

    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.indyweek.com/triangulator/archives/2009/03/30/anti-muni-broadband-bill-is-back/#1277112]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[simcha]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[well, for better or worse, its been the Law since Bev went along with the wisdom of the NCGA http://www.ncga.state.nc.us/gascripts/BillLookUp/BillLookUp.pl?Session=2009&BillID=S1004
        
        <br />
        Posted by 
        
          <a href="http://www.indyweek.com/indyweek/Profile?oid=1231529">Johnson</a>]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 13:09:26 -0400</pubDate>
    <source url="http://www.indyweek.com">Indy Week</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Anti-muni broadband bill is back]]></title>

    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.indyweek.com/triangulator/archives/2009/03/30/anti-muni-broadband-bill-is-back/#1278181]]></link>

    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.indyweek.com/triangulator/archives/2009/03/30/anti-muni-broadband-bill-is-back/#1278181]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[Rob Stolsig]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[Then to your point, is there anything at all in the legislation which would have prevented the town of Wilson from installing their service (and please point out where in the legislation and how it would prevent it)? On a curious note, because I really do think if a city can pull it off they should, how did the city of Wilson fund the startup without taxpayers money?
        
        <br />
        Posted by 
        
          Rob Stolsig]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 17:33:39 -0400</pubDate>
    <source url="http://www.indyweek.com">Indy Week</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Anti-muni broadband bill is back]]></title>

    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.indyweek.com/triangulator/archives/2009/03/30/anti-muni-broadband-bill-is-back/#1277192]]></link>

    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.indyweek.com/triangulator/archives/2009/03/30/anti-muni-broadband-bill-is-back/#1277192]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[Fiona Morgan]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[As a matter of clarity, I'd like to point out that the City of Wilson, which is an often cited example of municipal broadband service, has never used tax money to build or subsidize its Greenlight service. Customers in Wilson can choose between Greenlight, Time Warner Cable, Embarq DSL and other services.
        
        <br />
        Posted by 
        
          <a href="http://www.indyweek.com/indyweek/Profile?oid=1224423">Fiona Morgan, Indy staff writer</a>]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 11:08:46 -0400</pubDate>
    <source url="http://www.indyweek.com">Indy Week</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Anti-muni broadband bill is back]]></title>

    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.indyweek.com/triangulator/archives/2009/03/30/anti-muni-broadband-bill-is-back/#1277671]]></link>

    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.indyweek.com/triangulator/archives/2009/03/30/anti-muni-broadband-bill-is-back/#1277671]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[Rob Stolsig]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[Well said Marie, The bill, as I read it, only applies those same fees and regulations to the city owned service as to privately owned services.
        
        <br />
        Posted by 
        
          Rob Stolsig]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 10:39:47 -0400</pubDate>
    <source url="http://www.indyweek.com">Indy Week</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Anti-muni broadband bill is back]]></title>

    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.indyweek.com/triangulator/archives/2009/03/30/anti-muni-broadband-bill-is-back/#1277108]]></link>

    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.indyweek.com/triangulator/archives/2009/03/30/anti-muni-broadband-bill-is-back/#1277108]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[Marie Howell]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[Goodness gracious! The &ldquo;poor&rdquo; cities are under attack again!
        
        <br />
        Posted by 
        
          Marie Howell]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 18:35:21 -0400</pubDate>
    <source url="http://www.indyweek.com">Indy Week</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Anti-muni broadband bill is back]]></title>

    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.indyweek.com/triangulator/archives/2009/03/30/anti-muni-broadband-bill-is-back/#1277999]]></link>

    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.indyweek.com/triangulator/archives/2009/03/30/anti-muni-broadband-bill-is-back/#1277999]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[Franklin Palmroos]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[Local governments should all be able to install 
    Broadband. Politicans should be working for the people not the monopolies.
        
        <br />
        Posted by 
        
          Franklin Palmroos]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 22:09:52 -0400</pubDate>
    <source url="http://www.indyweek.com">Indy Week</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Anti-muni broadband bill is back]]></title>

    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.indyweek.com/triangulator/archives/2009/03/30/anti-muni-broadband-bill-is-back/#1277881]]></link>

    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.indyweek.com/triangulator/archives/2009/03/30/anti-muni-broadband-bill-is-back/#1277881]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[Anti-Community Broadband Bills Return - Carriers take aim at North Carolina &mdash; again&hellip;. | remove the labels | Gadgets and Life]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[the laws are being pushed again &mdash; most recently in Pennsylvania, and now, say locals, in North Carolina by Democratic State Senator David Hoyle: Last week, N.C. Sen. David Hoyle (D-Gaston) introduced [...]
        
        <br />
        Posted by 
        
          Anti-Community Broadband Bills Return - Carriers take aim at North Carolina &mdash; again&hellip;. | remove the labels | Gadgets and Life]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 07:28:39 -0400</pubDate>
    <source url="http://www.indyweek.com">Indy Week</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Anti-muni broadband bill is back]]></title>

    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.indyweek.com/triangulator/archives/2009/03/30/anti-muni-broadband-bill-is-back/#1276935]]></link>

    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.indyweek.com/triangulator/archives/2009/03/30/anti-muni-broadband-bill-is-back/#1276935]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[Mark Rosenstein]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[This bill is a Very Bad Idea. I was involved with the City of Asheville when cable contract renewal was on the table.
        
        <br />
        Posted by 
        
          Mark Rosenstein]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 15:06:41 -0400</pubDate>
    <source url="http://www.indyweek.com">Indy Week</source>
  </item>
        
      
    </channel>
  </rss>



