<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>








































































  <rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <channel>
      <title>Comments On: State regulators approve Jordan Lake revisions
    
      by Matt Salda&amp;ntilde;a</title>
      <link>http://www.indyweek.com/triangulator/archives/2009/02/06/state-regulators-approve-jordan-lake-revisions</link>
      <atom:link href="http://www.indyweek.com/indyweek/Rss.xml?oid=1274962&amp;id=comments" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />      <description>Comments On: State regulators approve Jordan Lake revisions
    
      by Matt Salda&amp;ntilde;a</description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <copyright>Copyright 2013 Indy Week. All rights reserved. This RSS file is offered to individuals, Indy Week readers, and non-commercial organizations only. Any commercial websites wishing to use this RSS file, please contact Indy Week.</copyright>
      <webMaster>pweber@indyweek.com (Indy Week Webmaster)</webMaster>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 00:00:01 -0400</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 01:30:00 -0400</lastBuildDate>
      <generator>Foundation</generator>
      <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
      
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: State regulators approve Jordan Lake revisions]]></title>

    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.indyweek.com/triangulator/archives/2009/02/06/state-regulators-approve-jordan-lake-revisions/#1277628]]></link>

    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.indyweek.com/triangulator/archives/2009/02/06/state-regulators-approve-jordan-lake-revisions/#1277628]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[Haw River Assembly survey says Jordan Lake is &lsquo;6,200 feet upstream&rsquo; - Triangulator - Indy Week Blogs]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[the survey to the N.C. Division of Water Quality for the first time. In February 2009, the agency approved the survey on technical merit, after determining that Duke had exceeded his authority in changing Durham&rsquo;s maps without [...]
        
        <br />
        Posted by 
        
          Haw River Assembly survey says Jordan Lake is &lsquo;6,200 feet upstream&rsquo; - Triangulator - Indy Week Blogs]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 19:14:19 -0400</pubDate>
    <source url="http://www.indyweek.com">Indy Week</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: State regulators approve Jordan Lake revisions]]></title>

    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.indyweek.com/triangulator/archives/2009/02/06/state-regulators-approve-jordan-lake-revisions/#1276996]]></link>

    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.indyweek.com/triangulator/archives/2009/02/06/state-regulators-approve-jordan-lake-revisions/#1276996]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[Jordan Lake developers cover all the bases in lawsuit against Durham County - Triangulator - Indy Week Blogs]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[lawsuit claims that DWQ&rsquo;s February 2009 approval of Hunter&rsquo;s survey (which, despite reports in other media, did not approve Duke&rsquo;s actions surrounding the [...]
        
        <br />
        Posted by 
        
          Jordan Lake developers cover all the bases in lawsuit against Durham County - Triangulator - Indy Week Blogs]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 12:22:16 -0400</pubDate>
    <source url="http://www.indyweek.com">Indy Week</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: State regulators approve Jordan Lake revisions]]></title>

    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.indyweek.com/triangulator/archives/2009/02/06/state-regulators-approve-jordan-lake-revisions/#1276848]]></link>

    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.indyweek.com/triangulator/archives/2009/02/06/state-regulators-approve-jordan-lake-revisions/#1276848]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[John Schelp]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[Talk about opening up a big shiny can of worms... If Durham accepts this private developer's survey to redraw the lake-shore, it would be the first time that a developer in NC can just go out and change a watershed map by doing their own little survey of an important water supply.
        
        <br />
        Posted by 
        
          <a href="http://www.indyweek.com/indyweek/Profile?oid=1224238">John Schelp</a>]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2009 08:21:44 -0500</pubDate>
    <source url="http://www.indyweek.com">Indy Week</source>
  </item>
        
          <item>
    
    <title><![CDATA[Re: State regulators approve Jordan Lake revisions]]></title>

    
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.indyweek.com/triangulator/archives/2009/02/06/state-regulators-approve-jordan-lake-revisions/#1276872]]></link>

    <guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[http://www.indyweek.com/triangulator/archives/2009/02/06/state-regulators-approve-jordan-lake-revisions/#1276872]]></guid>
    <author><![CDATA[Steve Bocckino]]></author>
    <description>
      
      <![CDATA[If you don't like this decision (and I don't) and want the world to know it, there is an online petition at http://www.PetitionOnline.com/jrdnsrvy/
        
        <br />
        Posted by 
        
          <a href="http://www.indyweek.com/indyweek/Profile?oid=1229250">Steve Bocckino</a>]]>
    </description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 20:41:53 -0500</pubDate>
    <source url="http://www.indyweek.com">Indy Week</source>
  </item>
        
      
    </channel>
  </rss>



