Americas helpless victim culture, by the numbers.
Every mass shooting (which makes up a tiny, tiny amount of all the shootings in the country each year, but all the blacks being killed in Dem controlled cities, with lots of gun control, do not make it to the liberal news) has happened in a no gun zone, or committed on liberals and Dems, who abhor self defense.
We have legally purchased 70 millions guns since Obama was elected. Liberals say the guns are the problem. Yet crime keeps dropping, except in Dem controlled cities with lots of gun control.
The liberal news does not seem able to see those numbers.
The liberal created killing fields, have only ensured that when, not if, a shooter shows up, that the carnage will reach liberal news proportions.
Norway has gun control laws liberals drool over, yet one man was able to slaughter 80 disarmed victims, because liberals made sure they were disarmed.
Just like the gay night club in Orlando.
This keeps happening, yet the liberals feel that disarming more victims, and hindering the law abiding, will somehow keep bad guys from killing.
Lord help us.
We can. Just not propaganda studies to show bogus stats to infringe law abiding citizens rights while doing nothing to actually stop violence. John Lott does it all the time, but liberals hate facts that interfer with their beliefs.
No problem as long as they don't give money to anti gun nuts.
Wow, a dozen shoguns are WMD's. We need to regulate these Japanese Warlords more closely.
As usual, the liberal news focuses on a completely unimportant aspect of this crime, "Where o where, did he get these guns". Well, I suspect he bought them legally. Which is completely irrelevant. That he possessed them, and used them in a crime, is the only relevancy. If he bought them illegally, there is no paper work. If he bought them legally, there is no reason to care. What matters is he used them to kill. Just like all the other killers do, who get their guns illegally. This would be like trying to find out where a drunk driver bought his car, and some liberal wanting to know so he could sue the car dealer. Or get a law that requires car dealers to do background checks on people that buy cars. Which would add to costs, and do NOTHING to stop drunk driving.
Good God, another felon had a gun (I thought you liberal nuts said background checks will stop that) and he killed someone with it and you nutjobs want to regulate MY gun. What the hell is wrong with you people??? Next you idiots will be wanting to ban trucks because they kill people (driven by drunk drivers). You efforts to stop violent people (by being a gun bigot) would be better served if you just sat around a fire, held hands and sang kum by yah.
Politicians respond to voters. Most of them do not give a rats ass about protecting the rights of their constituents, they are just in it for the power (and after money opportunities). Dmes cater to big business and the voters who suck on the Gov teet, and Repubs cater to big business and gun rights activists. Looks like we have a bunch of RINOS in Raleigh.
It is just mystifying how liberals support a woman's choice that "always" kills an unborn innocent child, and they have no problem with that, yet will deny the same woman the choice to use a gun ot protect her students, because a child "might" get harmed, and they are OK with that.
These liberals are insane, and should have to pass a test to vote.
The only assumption I can make , is that these liberals fear they might get shot by an armed citizen, but have no fear they will ever be aborted.
Freedom is messy, o insane ones, deal with it.
All Comments »
Make sure you're signed up so we can inbox you the latest.
Login to choose your subscriptions!
Indy Week • 201 W. Main St., Suite 101, Durham, NC 27701 • phone 919-286-1972 • fax 919-286-4274
RSS Feeds | Powered by Foundation