- Home
- Blogs
- News
- Music
- Film
- Food
- Arts
- Columns
- Elections
- Best of the Triangle
- Ads & Classifieds
- Free Stuff
Browse News
Browse Elections
Browse Columns
Browse Music
Browse Arts
Browse Film
Browse Food
- Triangle Dining Guide
- Submit or update a dining listing
- Big Bite, the INDY's food blog
- Farmers Markets
- Dish special issue
- Food Archives
- Eats 2012-2013
Browse Sports
Browse Ads & Classifieds
- Advertise with Us
- Free Classifieds
- Consignment & Resale
- Open for Business
- Annual Manual 2012-2013
- Eats 2013-2014
- Earth-friendly
Browse Free Stuff
- Giveaways & Contests
- Newsletter sign-up
- Astrology, Cartoons, Puzzles
- Give!Guide
- Gifts of Love
- Top Dog
- INDY Animals
Browse Blogs
- Triangle Offense (sports)
- Triangulator (news)
- Citizen (Raleigh)
- Big Bite (food)
- Artery (arts)
- Scan (music)
Browse Best of the Triangle
chill-bro22
Member since Nov 25, 2012
click to enlarge
Manifesto/Bio
I've never chilled harder.
Links to Me
- Nobody links to me!
Recent Comments
Custom Lists
- Zip.
© 2013
Indy Week • 302 E. Pettigrew St., Suite 300, Durham, NC 27701 • phone 919-286-1972 • fax 919-286-4274
RSS Feeds | Powered by Foundation
Re: “Duke Theater Studies' revival of the 17th-century classic Women Beware Women”
Mr. Woods failed to address O'berski's unique decision to cast all women for the show. A decision I believe became the defining characteristic of the production along with gender changes for several characters and an altered ending without the moralizing judgement of the Cardinal. O'berski undoubtedly deviated from Middleton's vision for the play, however, he is certainly deserving of a critique that actually addresses the experimental and innovative directorial choices he made for this production. C'mon Byron, do better.