benjoshin | Indy Week

benjoshin 
Member since Oct 25, 2012


Stats

Friends

  • No friends yet.
Become My Friend Find friends »

Recent Comments

Re: “Raleigh City Council votes in secret to give Jehovah’s Witnesses $150,000

David, Noah, Moses, Daniel and many more people in the bible all faced life threatening situations in order to prove faithful to God. Yes they are all dead now and if this system keeps on Myself too will perish eventually........ but one thing those faithful mentioned have to look forward to is the resurrection that Jehovah promised his faithful followers. I rather put my faith in what God promised in the bible.

22 likes, 22 dislikes
Posted by benjoshin on 10/25/2012 at 1:05 AM

Re: “Raleigh City Council votes in secret to give Jehovah’s Witnesses $150,000

And to the Charity comments I can tell you first hand that one of the most amazing things I seen was in New Orleans after Hurricane Katrina. I was born in raised in that city and saw Jehovah Witnesses everywhere fixing peoples houses like nobody business. New Orleans had Witnesses from everywhere helping Witnesses and non witnesses free of charge. I do agree that Witnesses main focus is the preaching work but if you come to think about it that's the most important charity you can do is give up your time to help someone learn the bible. Jesus commissioned his followers to preach. Thats what Jesus did. He didn't build hospitals and set up non for profits! He taught his followers Gods word. He taught that his father would solve mankind problem by means of his kingdom.

38 likes, 17 dislikes
Posted by benjoshin on 10/25/2012 at 12:29 AM

Re: “Raleigh City Council votes in secret to give Jehovah’s Witnesses $150,000

This came out last week in the Chicago Tribune!

http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2012-10…

10 likes, 11 dislikes
Posted by benjoshin on 10/25/2012 at 12:18 AM

Re: “Raleigh City Council votes in secret to give Jehovah’s Witnesses $150,000

Thought I should share this about Blood Transfusions

Does the Bible’s prohibition include human blood?

Yes, and early Christians understood it that way. Acts 15:29 says to “keep abstaining from . . . blood.” It does not say merely to abstain from animal blood. (Compare Leviticus 17:10, which prohibited eating “any sort of blood.”) Tertullian (who wrote in defense of the beliefs of early Christians) stated: “The interdict upon ‘blood’ we shall understand to be (an interdict) much more upon human blood.”—The Ante-Nicene Fathers, Vol. IV, p. 86.

Is a transfusion really the same as eating blood?

In a hospital, when a patient cannot eat through his mouth, he is fed intravenously. Now, would a person who never put blood into his mouth but who accepted blood by transfusion really be obeying the command to “keep abstaining from . . . blood”? (Acts 15:29) To use a comparison, consider a man who is told by the doctor that he must abstain from alcohol. Would he be obedient if he quit drinking alcohol but had it put directly into his veins?

In the case of a patient that refuses blood, are there any alternative treatments?

Often simple saline solution, Ringer’s solution, and dextran can be used as plasma volume expanders, and these are available in nearly all modern hospitals. Actually, the risks that go with use of blood transfusions are avoided by using these substances. The Canadian Anaesthetists’ Society Journal (January 1975, p. 12) says: “The risks of blood transfusion are the advantages of plasma substitutes: avoidance of bacterial or viral infection, transfusion reactions and Rh sensitization.” Jehovah’s Witnesses have no religious objection to the use of nonblood plasma expanders.

Jehovah’s Witnesses actually benefit from better medical treatment because they do not accept blood. A doctor writing in the American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology (June 1, 1968, p. 395) acknowledged: “There is no doubt that the situation where you [the surgeon] are operating without the possibility of transfusion tends to improve your surgery. You are a little bit more aggressive in clamping every bleeding vessel.”

All types of surgery can be performed successfully without blood transfusions. This includes open-heart operations, brain surgery, amputation of limbs, and total removal of cancerous organs. Writing in the New York State Journal of Medicine (October 15, 1972, p. 2527), Dr. Philip Roen said: “We have not hesitated to perform any and all indicated surgical procedures in the face of proscribed blood replacement.” Dr. Denton Cooley, at the Texas Heart Institute, said: “We became so impressed with the results [from using nonblood plasma expanders] on the Jehovah’s Witnesses that we started using the procedure on all our heart patients.” (The San Diego Union, December 27, 1970, p. A-10) “‘Bloodless’ open-heart surgery, originally developed for adult members of the Jehovah’s Witnesses sect because their religion forbids blood transfusions, now has been safely adapted for use in delicate cardiac procedures in infants and children.”—Cardiovascular News, February 1984, p. 5.

24 likes, 18 dislikes
Posted by benjoshin on 10/25/2012 at 12:15 AM

Extra Extra!

Make sure you're signed up so we can inbox you the latest.

  • Weekly Newsletter (Wednesday) - The stories in this week's issue
  • Weekly Events Newsletter - Our picks for your weekend and beyond

Login to choose
your subscriptions!

Favorite Places

  • None.
Find places »

Saved Events

  • Nada.
Find events »

Saved Stories

  • Nope.
Find stories »

Custom Lists

  • Zip.
 

© 2016 Indy Week • 201 W. Main St., Suite 101, Durham, NC 27701 • phone 919-286-1972 • fax 919-286-4274
RSS Feeds | Powered by Foundation