Do you all hear that? No? That's the sound of the world's smallest violin, playing "My heart bleeds for you".
"On Monday, McCrory told The News & Observer that he's been considered for part-time teaching positions, but university leaders are worried about student protests. 'That's not the way our American system should operate,' he said."
Um, that's EXACTLY how "our American system" operates. Organizations and companies make decisions, and the public either supports them in the mythical free market, or protests them. Is Pat suggesting that protesting isn't American? Or is it that protesting things that Republicans support isn't American?
"...Average American's are not nearly as stupid as you think we are..."
Based on the recent election as a national sample, and the continuing makeup of the NCGA as a local one...
Yes. Yes they are.
Not found, error 404
Fortunately, there is the Wayback Machine.
Cat, why would a "statist rag" admit to "governmental regulation" closing businesses when not a single one of those business owners themselves will say such a thing?
Did you even read any of the paragraphs above, or the several stories over the past couple of weeks about these restaurants?
"If not [Woodhouse being elected], the new Council becomes a membership with little thought diversity, little debate and little ideas."
Or, one could also say, the growing and modernizing city of Raleigh almost unanimously agrees, in the voting booth, that there's no place for someone whose policies and opinions are so backwards.
And in a week, we'll know if we can strike the "almost" from that sentence.
I love all the people who claim to be "well-versed" in science, who pick and choose which parts of some email threads prove that this is all a giant hoax, who point to one or two things as proof that 20 or 30 other things aren't really happening.
I'm gonna go out on a limb, and suggest that one of the most esteemed meteorologists in the country, who used to believe that climate change was a hoax and now realizes that's an opinion not based on the science, that's been a practicing meteorologist for 30+ years...probably understands the science better than all of you "well-versed" people.
So how does that address issues like Tamir Rice, who was shot 2 seconds after police arrived on the scene? Or officers in AZ that turned off their body cameras before beating a prone and surrendered suspect? Why does a history of committing crimes in the past excuse police manhandling a suspect so violently this time that they all but SEVERED HIS SPINE?
When did cops get a permanent green light to use deadly force for any perceived infraction of surrender? A nonviolent suspect running away does not present a threat of imminent harm. A suspect sitting on a table in the park does not present immediate harm. A history of selling drugs does not present immediate harm.
It seems that some portion of law enforcement has forgotten that their job is not to pass judgement and carry out sentence - it's to apprehend suspects (suspects that at the time they're being apprehended, usually have not yet been found GUILTY of anything) to get them into the justice system.
Here's another weird trick to keep from getting shot by cops: Start trying cops that kill suspects at the drop of a hat as murderers, and the rate of police violence against suspects will drop.
All Comments »
Make sure you're signed up so we can inbox you the latest.
Login to choose your subscriptions!
Indy Week • 201 W. Main St., Suite 101, Durham, NC 27701 • phone 919-286-1972 • fax 919-286-4274
RSS Feeds | Powered by Foundation