I'm assuming the "sources knowledgeable of the situation" asked not to be named because their speculation on the future of the Motorco building is completely, entirely, 100% untrue. Side note: this is the second time in as many days I've read an Indy article that's left me fuming. Get it together, y'all. Maybe check a fact every now and then. Yeesh.
Grayson: Anonymous or not, the points made here are valid; maybe you should actually address them instead of focusing on the namecalling or identities of the people who commented. Granted, a lot of these points are horrendously moronic and don't deserve to be read, much less responded to. However, I'd really like to hear a rebuttal to the comments from Cotafloata, Soothslayer, Igib, and Seamoster.
If your response to stupid comments is just as stupid as the comments themselves, then EVERYONE LOOKS STUPID. I want to respect you as a writer, critic, and music lover, but I don't think I can if you won't refute some of these points. You want to get back to the original topic? Let's get back to it.
And for the sake of candor, my name is Chelsea flippin' Webster.
Make sure you're signed up so we can inbox you the latest.
Login to choose your subscriptions!
Indy Week • 201 W. Main St., Suite 101, Durham, NC 27701 • phone 919-286-1972 • fax 919-286-4274
RSS Feeds | Powered by Foundation