My comment was all about Geary and his article. Geary is the "progressive", "diversity" sycophant.... who insults Tata with well-practiced contempt, the familiar trade mark of pretend intellectualism.
Based on the source and content of that criticism, I judge Tata to be a great pick .
Bob Geary's snide, character assassin's, article is imbued with the typical inanities of "progressive" sneering and "diversity worshiping" nonsense...
A "Progressive", in the American political line-up, is the next thing to a crypto-Commie, whose destructive (and always counterproductive) ideology hides behind every crazy platitude known to man. It is the triumph of the leveler's "airy thoughts" over cold reality, always hiding a ruthless will to power (effectively disguised as disinterested charity and claimed intention to promote "social justice"... that has a familiar "Obama" ring to it, doesn't it?).
Those who tout "diversity" ascribe to the insane (pathological) notion that highlighting and promoting differences among race/sex/class and income identity groups will promote harmony: "In diversity there is unity". And if that seems a tad contradictory to you, well that's because you are a stupid and un-enlightened troglodyte, unable to grasp the subtleies of the truly sophisticated and superior intellects among us, who, as an act of grace, have condescended to throw us a lifeline. (Listen to an Obama speech, or more accurately, one written for his teleprompter).
What a bunch of dopes!
Indy Week • 302 E. Pettigrew St., Suite 300, Durham, NC 27701 • phone 919-286-1972 • fax 919-286-4274
RSS Feeds | Powered by Foundation