"Deal with these questions, instead of evading them by insinuating I am equating the reviewer to a misogynist."
What? That doesn't even make sense. I was insinuating that YOU were a misogynist.
So you're comparing your hypothetical misogynistic insults to a music review? I believe you've added another data point to my thesis. Stay classy Delta Rae fan.
There seems to be a correlation between how much a band sucks and how shrilly their fans will screech at any criticsm. Really, if you like it what do you care if someone else doesn't?
Anyone know who took that photo?
Thanks you for your clarification, such as it is.
"However, given the State refuses to seriously consider this third way alternative, this amendment is the only way to prevent a out of control judiciary from ignoring our existing laws and forcing their will upon us."
A little clarification please. I may be reading this wrong, but it sounds like you're saying something like, "Although we can not achieve our larger goal of ending the state's involvement in marriage, this amendment might allow us to at least prevent some people from marrying."
My apologies in advance if this ethically abhorrent sentiment is not what you intended.
And you have failed to show me where it says marriage is only between one man and one woman. Come on, help this poor, ignorant sinner out. It's a big book with lots of long words! Show me where, chapter and verse, it restricts marriage in this way if you want to do your christian duty and help us sinners see the light.
Point is, you can't. Brother, I grew up in the church, and I mean IN THE CHURCH. I've read the book cover to cover. Point to the actual words that justify your bigotry or admit, if only to yourself, that it only comes from inside you.
All Comments »
Indy Week • 201 W. Main St., Suite 101, Durham, NC 27701 • phone 919-286-1972 • fax 919-286-4274
RSS Feeds | Powered by Foundation