It was an editing error. It has been fixed. Thanks for pointing it out.
Mary Ann, pretty strong assertions. Any proof? Any science about what pit bulls were _intended_ to do? Ms. Dickey cited hundreds of sources. You obviously have a thing about hating pit bulls -- as your one-note Twitter account proves. But your invective lacks anything substantive. If you want to convince people, make a solid argument.
The word shampoo dates to 1762. It is of Hindi origin.
It's actually the tolerant response by the peers of those straight-identified, male-identified suburban high school students who shower together that supports the hypothesis.
Trying to understand the logic whereby the Constitution is your source, but Lincoln, as president, enforcing the laws of the land and power of the federal government, is treasonous. You can't have it both ways, "Pastor"
Where in the U.S. Constitution did it guarantee the right of human beings to own other human beings?
Dude, apologies for conflating your positions with those of another frequent commenter. My main point was that you cherry-pick your arguments. Let's put it this way: If a psychiatrist came out and espoused the idea that homophobia was a mental illness, I'd lay good odds we'd get a lengthy, critical response from you, questioning the veracity of this supposed man of science (and very possibly including the term 'libtard').
All Comments »
Make sure you're signed up so we can inbox you the latest.
Login to choose your subscriptions!
Indy Week • 201 W. Main St., Suite 101, Durham, NC 27701 • phone 919-286-1972 • fax 919-286-4274
RSS Feeds | Powered by Foundation