- Home
- Blogs
- News
- Music
- Film
- Food
- Arts
- Columns
- Elections
- Best of the Triangle
- Ads & Classifieds
- Free Stuff
Browse News
Browse Elections
Browse Columns
Browse Music
Browse Arts
Browse Film
Browse Food
- Triangle Dining Guide
- Submit or update a dining listing
- Big Bite, the INDY's food blog
- Farmers Markets
- Dish special issue
- Food Archives
- Eats 2012-2013
Browse Sports
Browse Ads & Classifieds
- Advertise with Us
- Free Classifieds
- Consignment & Resale
- Open for Business
- Annual Manual 2012-2013
- Eats 2013-2014
- Earth-friendly
Browse Free Stuff
- Giveaways & Contests
- Newsletter sign-up
- Astrology, Cartoons, Puzzles
- Give!Guide
- Gifts of Love
- Top Dog
- INDY Animals
Browse Blogs
- Triangle Offense (sports)
- Triangulator (news)
- Citizen (Raleigh)
- Big Bite (food)
- Artery (arts)
- Scan (music)
Browse Best of the Triangle
GG
Member since Apr 27, 2008
Manifesto/Bio
Links to Me
- Nobody links to me!
Recent Comments
Custom Lists
- Zip.
© 2013
Indy Week • 302 E. Pettigrew St., Suite 300, Durham, NC 27701 • phone 919-286-1972 • fax 919-286-4274
RSS Feeds | Powered by Foundation
Re: “Kay Hagan”
"a one-time immunity provision for the telecoms" offers the opportunity to bypass necessary litigation for this criminal behavior to be revealed. It shows a very shallow understanding of the point of the lawsuits. The Administration's main reason to provide immunity to the telcoms is to avoid having the public hear how our rights were trampled by an over-zealous Dept. of Justice. It's NOT about actual corporate financial liability, but about continuing the concealment of these crimes, by the companies and especially by officials.