Indy Week | Comment Archives | Stories

Narrow Search

Re: “A Superlative Adaptation of Virginia Woolf's Orlando Packs Centuries of Insight into a Fleet Eighty Minutes

I'm not a theatergoer, so it was off my usual path to see this production. The small/ mighty cast approached a timely and delicate theme with feverish energy and grace. They delivered Virginia Woolf's sense of humor intact while also making it their own. I was entirely transfixed, barely realizing the time that had passed. The physical space, which flanked the aisle stage with rows of seating, created a productive discomfort for me; when the actors were faced away from my side of the theater, watching the audience watching on the other side became natural and necessary for gathering information about what was happening on stage. Unforgettably creative on every level. (I would've been happy just sitting among the metalwork.) Maybe I'll become a theatergoer after all...

3 likes, 0 dislikes
Posted by Aims Arches on 02/01/2017 at 9:22 PM

Re: “February 1 crossword

The last line of clues was omitted in the print version.

Posted by DG 1 on 02/01/2017 at 4:16 PM

Re: “Meet the Triangle Refugees Who Donald Trump Believes Pose a Threat to the United States

Trump did not impose a 'Muslim ban.' False, not so. Be responsible, review and report on what Trump actually did. Trump did impose a temporary travel ban into the USA for people from 7 nations regardless of religious affiliation.

2 likes, 8 dislikes
Posted by Jim Smith on 02/01/2017 at 4:06 PM

Re: “The Loop is a badlands. We should get rid of it.

ProudlyUnaffiliated's post is typical of people who never walk anywhere other than to or from their car. Summarizing the road design as a 'pedestrian issue' only reveals the car centric world they live in. Pedestrian bridges are also expensive, ugly, and blight the streetscape. Oh, and they are part of the 70's urban planning mindset that pretends that cars eat at restaurants and work in buildings and not people.
This is more than finding safe places for people to walk. It is about removing the scar this unnecessary motorway has left in the fabric of the town

1 like, 0 dislikes
Posted by John Rees on 02/01/2017 at 3:07 PM

Re: “Meet the Triangle Refugees Who Donald Trump Believes Pose a Threat to the United States

Ah... so all the snowflakes get their dose of "the feelz" for the day...

You see refugees.. i just see a bunch of people who are running away from their own countries and peoples problems. There heroes are the ones who stay and fight, not the quitter who run away.

2 likes, 19 dislikes
Posted by Mike Moore on 02/01/2017 at 9:36 AM

Re: “As Protests Mount Over Trump’s Immigration Executive Order, What Are N.C. Pols Saying?

Burr is getting on my last nerve.

3 likes, 0 dislikes
Posted by Abby Nardo on 02/01/2017 at 8:35 AM

Re: “Scott Crawford Refused to Sell Us a Plate of Food at Crawford and Son

Also, Crawford's letter posted on his site is spot on. Too many bums want to write about food but have no qualifications to do so. These aren't the seasoned vets who did these reviews professionally and did their homework, these are bloggers who want to be a big fish in a small pond.

25 likes, 16 dislikes
Posted by cjwatson on 01/30/2017 at 2:11 PM

Re: “Scott Crawford Refused to Sell Us a Plate of Food at Crawford and Son

It's quite possible that all the hit pieces Grayson Currin did on behalf of the Indy is what will do you in when it comes to reviewing places in the future. It is Crawford's right to decline your seating, you weren't there just to eat like other guests. Buck up already.

26 likes, 15 dislikes
Posted by cjwatson on 01/30/2017 at 1:59 PM
Posted by Mark Neill on 01/30/2017 at 9:10 AM

Re: “1,500 Protesters Converge on RDU to Protest Trump’s Muslim Ban

One correction: I was in the front and the line was not "breached". The security barrier was removed by a uniformed officer and we were instructed to move forward.

7 likes, 1 dislike
Posted by Sharon Spry on 01/30/2017 at 7:04 AM

Re: “Scott Crawford Refused to Sell Us a Plate of Food at Crawford and Son

Cheers to Scott Crawford! Food reviews in general are out of control and have lost their way as a means to give any inkling of what the restaurant is actually like.

21 likes, 21 dislikes
Posted by Gregory de Marchi on 01/29/2017 at 11:05 PM

Re: “Scott Crawford Refused to Sell Us a Plate of Food at Crawford and Son

Thanks to @JK 2 for the links. After reading the original article and his response to this one, it's pretty clear why it went down this way. He objected to her previous review and didn't want to subject himself to it again. Whether or not he has a right to do that, or if it was in poor taste to do so, is up to the opinion of the readers.

http://m.indyweek.com/indyweek/can-the-reo…

http://www.crawfordandsonrestaurant.com/in…

13 likes, 0 dislikes
Posted by aburtch on 01/29/2017 at 12:12 AM

Re: “Abandoned mobile homes plague North Carolina

I would love to buy one abandoned mobile homes. i have land to put home in cumberland county,nc.contact me please at silverpainn41@gmail.com..... thanks

0 likes, 1 dislike
Posted by terrio on 01/28/2017 at 11:42 PM

Re: “Scott Crawford Refused to Sell Us a Plate of Food at Crawford and Son

Let us hope the restaurant isn't as poorly conceived as this ill-fated "review". The reviewer here is more melodramatic than a kitchen full of Anthony Bourdains on drugs, but with far less eloquence.

25 likes, 23 dislikes
Posted by Andrew McGuffin on 01/28/2017 at 10:47 PM

Re: “Scott Crawford Refused to Sell Us a Plate of Food at Crawford and Son

I spent some time looking into this and decided to share some insight since most of the comments seem to be based only on the Indy spin and really only part of the story. As it turns out, the whole theme of the article is just silly, attention grabbing BS. The writer knew exactly why Crawford chose not to be reviewed by her. You see, Crawford sent a very professional letter to her editor long before this article was written explaining his choice. The readers and commenters have been a bit duped here. After reading comments on other forums and social media, it appears Crawford is not the only chef in the area food scene questioning the writers qualifications. He is just the only one to say "no thank you". Although, I have a feeling she will hear that much more often going forward.
Now lets get real for a minute on some of these comments. I saw things like "flash in the pan, mediocre, lazy, food fraud etc. It would seem that some 1 post wonders might have a vendetta here? Does anyone actually believe that those are words that describe a chef with a 20 plus year career, three mobil 5 star achievements, four James Beard nominations and hundreds of articles and accolades? Someone with an axe to grind also made the irresponsible and inaccurate statement that Crawford doesn't care about the community. Guess what folks, while that commenter was busy being a keyboard crusader, Crawford spent his time prepping for a charity event that he is involved in tomorrow. Yep, the same weekend that some anonymous poster called him names, he donated his time, resources and day off to his community. I'm all for reading different opinions but uninformed comments are irresponsible and the name calling comments are clearly personal, opportunistic and ridiculous.
Lets set the record straight, yes I know Chef Crawford and yes I am probably biased, but I do know the real scoop. Crawford is a successful business owner in your community who busted his butt to open his own restaurant, he is an amazing leader and mentor with an incredible team he considers family, he is a culinary artist who cares more about food than any of us will ever understand and he spent 20 years of dedication to building his brand. He has certainly earned the right to say "no thank you" to a food reviewer with questionable tenure from a publication that he doesn't trust to be responsible. In the end Indy just proved him right. They ran a sensationalized victim story with half the facts and allowed irresponsible commenters to go unchecked and unchallenged.

80 likes, 22 dislikes
Posted by Indy Reality Check on 01/28/2017 at 8:18 PM

Re: “Scott Crawford Refused to Sell Us a Plate of Food at Crawford and Son

Guy comes across as a bit of a coward to me. If your confident in your skills why would afraid to show them off. If this person gave him a less than flattering review at his previous spot that should be incentive to do better not turn your back and run!

18 likes, 26 dislikes
Posted by Frank 1 on 01/28/2017 at 6:47 PM

Re: “Scott Crawford Refused to Sell Us a Plate of Food at Crawford and Son

Indy doesn't just review restaurants. They have a prerogative and they get their rocks off by insulting businesses and the people who work in them. I think it's great he chose to not be written up in such a sad publication.

35 likes, 15 dislikes
Posted by LivTheDream on 01/28/2017 at 5:23 PM

Re: “The Controlled Chaos of Nora Rogers's Custom Guitar Rig

that gibson sg looks just like the one BIG BOY HENRY use to play. wish i could get to chapel hill tonight, i would like to hear it

Posted by tom 1 on 01/28/2017 at 4:13 PM

Re: “Scott Crawford Refused to Sell Us a Plate of Food at Crawford and Son

Scott Crawford is a great chef, a thoughtful human & an inspiring leader. Review or no review, Crawford & Son will be a favorite in the Triangle's dining scene for a long time.

38 likes, 15 dislikes
Posted by Vivian Howard on 01/28/2017 at 3:36 PM

Re: “Scott Crawford Refused to Sell Us a Plate of Food at Crawford and Son

A Moveable Feast:

First off, chef Crawford, by law, has the right to refuse service to anyone as his restaurant is on private property. Further, it is his prerogative to decide if he wants to be reviewed or not. Believe it or not, there are some restaurateurs who do not wish to be reviewed: while it has become status quo for journalists to write flowery, Faulkner-esque prose when describing restaurants for their reviews except that they focus less on the culinary side and "show off" their desires to be architects, art historians or psychologists--and in some cases, these self-proclaimed "culinarians" think that because they have been to Paris, or eaten at Alinea (or some Top 50 restaurant of the world list) they are qualified to potentially condemn someone else's livelihood; potentially ruin a man (or woman) and his/her family simply because the brown butter isn't brown enough?! It makes perfect sense that some would NOT want their story told by a person or persons with minimal credentials, a bone to pick or perhaps a conflict of interest (i.e., this business is an advertiser, "...make it glorious.."). Not to mention, that human error happens; Murphy's Law exists; EVERYONE has an off day. Should it it be THAT day when our whole world is exposed to ink, paper and/or keyboard?

Even if that wasn't the case, these reviews should tell the reader what is at the essence of the food experience and not spend the majority of a 1000 words dedicated to the Corinthian vs Doric columns or the post-Renaissance meets Shabby-shic wallpaper or spend an instant using the term "hipster." Who cares about tattoos or presumed egos? i surely don't. I thought we were trying to steer away from labeling and stereotypes.

I like to digress.

So, I will do some more of it. I don't read restaurant reviews. I don't write them either. When I travel, I find friends who live there or have been there and their recommendations are where I eat, where I sleep and where I go for adult beverages. I have never chosen a restaurant because it is the #1 on WELP, scored highly on Urbanspatula, FaceGram or the other social network sites out there.

I prefer reading the classics. My favorite writer is probably Hemingway. Sadly, he is not with us any longer...but that doesn't matter because he wouldn't have written or read restaurant reviews because there is more fun in living: catching fish, running with bulls, drinking Hemingway Daiquiris to spend on such trivial things. I like to think that his "review" would have been simple: he would have been a patron or he would not have.

But what do I know?

28 likes, 43 dislikes
Posted by Wim Mellon on 01/28/2017 at 12:10 PM

Our Guides

© 2017 Indy Week • 201 W. Main St., Suite 101, Durham, NC 27701 • phone 919-286-1972 • fax 919-286-4274
RSS Feeds | Powered by Foundation