My latest release features a member of the Raleigh Symphony Orchestra, as well as Autumn Rose Brand, strings and horns. And on and on. I got signed to a label out of DC for this album. "The Mayor of Estes Park". I hope you like it and I hope you all can attend. As for Frank Black, if it doesn't matter to you, it doesn't matter to me.
Wow if police have a warrant in hand they must go serve it and remain professional and calm , it is not the job of the home owner to be a professional at work , police this is nothing personal why not just do your job , raising all hell does not make your instructions more understanding. I wish police could calm down and stop acting like they are in war and being fired on from all directions , OK we are from so and so PD we do have a warrant and due to unfortunate allegations we must search the home but 1st let's get the children calm and the adults relaxed and understand that this is our job and if we find nothing there will be no charges , if we must arrest anyone they will be treated with professionalism and took to a magistrate judge to receive a bond . Thanks for your understanding in this matter we just have a job to do and this is nothing personal to us , it maybe personal to the community but there not professional law enforcement , it would make more since if a community member assaulted a weed dealer , DUE PROCESS please .
The real question is what the hell are the faculty thinking and how has the school not been sued? It has nothing to do with male bonding, but supervision, direction and avoiding a situation that is begging for some unfortunate incident or misunderstanding to wreak havoc. It is fascinating that there are posters for the club that no adult seemed to address for years and when one meekly did so they were ignored. Tolerance doesn't have to be taught by nude bobsledding in school. Seriously...
It's the Abigail who wrote this btw--and for those wondering what the hypothesis is, it's basically that Gen Z is definitely left of center--but dismantling the gender binary is not necessarily on the collective mind so much as redefining masculinity. The proof would be in the interviews with the boys, Schwalbe and Jae especially, as ze is very attuned to the degree of progressivism Gen Z is willing to offer.
Just wanna thanks say to the first guy that advocated for me, a minor, to wear revealing outfits and strip down in front of my male peers, I'll def take your advice to heart. @dude
Does anyone know why the venue changed for this show?
Mr Cabanas, Thank you for publishing the facts and refuting the emotional and misleading cut and paste propaganda on LRT from Mr. Baker. It really is too bad that there is such an emotional attachment to an inefficent transit mode whose time has past.
While many environmentalists quickly point out the adverse impact of the automobile — they quickly gloss over the environmental impact of near-empty light rail trains. The environmental impact of light rail, as a system, is considerably worse. The automobile takes passengers directly point-to-point (from origin to destination), but light rail requires supplemental trips to/from the station, whether via park-and-ride, kiss-and-ride, or bus.
"Many environmentalists support rail-based transit for environmental reasons, but to date only BRT projects have been certified as greenhouse gas-reduction projects by the Clean Development Mechanism defined in the Kyoto Protocol (see Bogotá and Mexico City). Additionally, the volume of vehicle-specific emissions that LRT and electric trolley bus systems produce depends on how their electric power is generated. If the source is coal-fired power plants, then the system may actually produce more CO2 than normal diesel vehicles do, even though people are exposed to fewer emissions on the street. Buses are major producers of particulate emissions unless they use low-sulfur fuels, have particulate traps and clean engines, or run on some source of fuel that is an alternative to diesel." — ITDP study, More Development For Your Transit Dollar @ http://bit.ly/1YActaZ
"Compared to rail systems, BRT systems also tend to be less intensive users of concrete and steel. Producing steel and concrete and building underground or elevated concrete structures generates a large amount of CO2. Many heavy-rail metro projects cannot reduce enough operations-related carbon emissions during their first twenty years to compensate for their construction-related CO2 emissions. Surface LRT generates less construction-related CO2 but still tends to generate more than a BRT project does." — ITDP study, More Development For Your Transit Dollar @ http://bit.ly/1YActaZ
Using the overly optimistic 23,000 daily boardings projection (in 2040) running 150 train trips per day across the end-to-end 17 mile line will result in an average 'load factor' of 9 passengers per vehicle mile traveled; or utilize less than 2% of the 500 passenger capacity heralded by GoTriangle. So for every one train that travels at the cited 500 passenger capacity, there will be ~50 trains running empty. Low capacity utilization is not environmentally or economically sound.
From an energy intensity perspective, this low utilization has a devastating impact on DOLRT energy efficiency. With an average of 9 passengers per mile results in 7029 BTU per DOLRT passenger mile (63265 BTU per vehicle mile / 9 passengers per mile) compared to 3144 BTU for car travel or 4071 BTU for bus transit. So per passenger mile, DOLRT uses over twice the amount of energy of an average car! SOURCE: US Department of Energy, Oak Ridge National Laboratory - Transportation Energy Data Book, Edition 34, page 2-19, Table 2.14 @ http://bit.ly/29VfIrq
Due to the limited coverage of light rail stations, light rail requires altered bus routes to "feed the beast”. These feeders add cost, consume more energy, increase travel distance and increase travel times, while compounding the traffic congestion they are supposedly trying to alleviate. The light rail system is forced to provide an entire, high capacity vehicle even when there are only a few riders.
The inconvenient truth is that not a single light rail in the US carries as many passengers as a single highway lane. The myriad of alternatives, like walking, bicycling, carpooling, van-pooling, congestion pricing, telecommuting, flexible working hours, parking reform, pricing strategies to improve bus utilization, etc — largely ignored while the money and attention is consumed by light rail.
The proposed Durham-Orange Light Rail train has NO new renewable energy requirement and electricity sourced from Duke Energy which has been repeatedly cited for environmental transgressions. Duke Energy generates electricity primarily with nuclear, gas (sourced from 'fracking') and coal power plants. The Political Economy Research Institute ranks Duke Energy 13th among corporations emitting airborne pollutants in the United States. The ranking is based on the quantity (80 million pounds in 2005) and toxicity of the emissions. When the high energy costs and carbon emissions during construction are counted, the light-rail line is far “browner” than autos and highways.
Forgetting greenhouse effects during construction?
"Neglecting to take into account the emissions associated with constructing buildings like train stations and laying the tracks may make train travel appear far more environmentally friendly than it actually is, the authors found." — How Green is Rail Travel? @ http://nyti.ms/29SrQdl
“Most current decision-making relies on analysis at the tailpipe, ignoring vehicle production, infrastructure provision, and fuel production required for support,” wrote the authors. “We find that total life-cycle energy inputs and greenhouse gas emissions contribute an additional 63 percent for on road, 155 percent for rail, and 31 percent for air systems," relative to those vehicles’ tailpipe emissions. — How Green is Rail Travel? @ http://nyti.ms/29SrQdl
Cement manufacturing releases CO2 in the atmosphere both directly when calcium carbonate is heated, producing lime and carbon dioxide, and also indirectly through the use of energy if its production involves the emission of CO2.The cement industry produces about 5% of global man-made CO2 emissions, of which 50% is from the chemical process, and 40% from burning fuel. The amount of CO2 emitted by the cement industry is nearly 900 kg of CO2 for every 1000 kg of cement produced. — Cement wiki @ http://bit.ly/29GobgE
Unfortunately, the often promised traffic congestion relief has not been experienced by communities that implement LRT. You can look at two examples (Charlotte & Los Angeles) or even in aggregate across the nation.
* Charlotte Lynx daily ridership has stagnated at 16,000 over last 7 years, even though the population has grown 17%. Despite all this investment in Lynx, Charlotte was rated as the having the worse traffic in NC @ http://bit.ly/1IzDh0d
* L.A. Expo Line hasn't reduced congestion as promised, a study (http://bit.ly/1P2R0q6) finds. Article @ http://lat.ms/1X4XIKy
Many advocates continue to claim that light rail reduces traffic congestion. However a closer look at the total national ridership statistics collected by APTA (1990 to 2014) reveals that total ridership over a 25 year period of massive investments in light rail development, the total ridership of local travel as represented by light rail and bus service has remained surprisingly flat at approximately 6 billion annual riders (nationally). Even with 28% US population growth, there is no evidence of increased ridership across these two modes of local public transportation. Evidence suggests that bus ridership has merely been shifted towards the more expensive light rail systems and has had no impact on reducing overall traffic congestion. Reference: Quarterly and Annual Totals by Mode – Collected by APTA @ http://bit.ly/202oLto
Even LRT advocates like Eric Jaffe have concluded this in a recent article: "There’s just the little problem of the evidence. With few exceptions, studies tend to find limited signs that transit has much of an impact on nearby road congestion. Some places see slight congestion gains or mileage declines in the short term, and well-designed service should lay the foundation for reduced car-reliance in the long run, but the direct transit-traffic link is tenuous at best." source: Public Transit Does Not Have to Reduce Traffic Congestion to Succeed @ http://bit.ly/1RweXDv
I had this same problem but do this...click on Download Larger PDF on this puzzle. It will bring up the 7/6/16 puzzle but this time, go to the URL and just change the 06 at the end of the address to 13, so it will read http://www.indyweek.com/crossword/crossword713.pdf instead of http://www.indyweek.com/crossword/crossword706.pdf. This brings up the correct puzzle.
Could you please put up the correct puzzle to print; last weeks puzzle keeps coming up to print..
It's actually the tolerant response by the peers of those straight-identified, male-identified suburban high school students who shower together that supports the hypothesis.
Would be interested in hearing from the author as to what "this hypothesis" is. If "this hypothesis" is that "...generation Z is moving ...left of center," then "this hypothesis" seems likely to be true, but weakly supported if supported at all by a group of straight-identified, male-identified suburban high school students showering together.
@chiburbbi I think it's the hypothesis in the preceding paragraph that, "...generation Z is moving left of center."
Excellent summary of the political history as well as weaving into that the personal stories of our fellow citizens who are so dramatically affected.
The author offers "Shower Club as a case study of this hypothesis." What is the hypothesis to which the author refers?
The slide show doesn't work. Can you publish the link that you sent to Mike_R1 above?
Great writing and reporting.
Also Bri, we mailed out your tote. Sorry you didn't get it. We are happy to send you another one.
Indy Week • 201 W. Main St., Suite 101, Durham, NC 27701 • phone 919-286-1972 • fax 919-286-4274
RSS Feeds | Powered by Foundation