To what audience is the condescending subtitle "PLEASE DON'T SCREW THIS UP" directed? Should we take notes or complete a quiz at the end?
Don't care enough about the Senate 20 race to even mention it?
You reviewed almost 67% of the choices for Dist. 1. Everything from A to B.
Four More Wars!
You reviewed almost 67% of the choices. Everything from A to B.
Just wanted Jim Bob above to know that I am also a Vietnam Vet. I am proud that there are more Democrats who are veterans (Bruce Davis in 13 is also) than there are Republicans running for Congress.
I think T. Greg Doucette will make an excellent state senator, not because he's my son, but because he's continually been involved in the community. Also, as an attorney he's much more aware of laws that need to change as well as those that need to be repealed. He's not a typical modern day Republican. If you read his platform online at www.votetgreg.com, you'll see why many people from all sides support him! Including Joy Reid!
You got the referendum wrong. That should be a big NO! I'm not against buses but that train is ridiculous and a huge waste of money. At least get something like Atlanta's MARTA. Otherwise I'll have to buy a penny farthing to ride up to the ol' timey station!
Have you lost your minds?????
There is NO Republican who will be more effective than Mike Woodard. Your logic fails. Utterly.
In all Mike's years of public service, he has been the Energizer Bunny, seemingly in multiple places at once. He has been an outspoken voice on progressive issues. He has tirelessly sought to reach across the aisle even in these acrimonious times.
Your recommendation of a Republican for that seat is pure-T boneheaded dumb dumb dumb. Take it back!
Indy seems to have gone cray-cray....Mike Woodard for NC Senate 22!
Bad call Indy. You are endorsing a continuation of neoliberalism, corporate control of our lives, and war. #VoteJillStein
The Senate Republicans have shown zero propensity to moderate on issues, and a freshman republican from would have no affect on them. Shame on you for not endorsing Mike Woodard. Mike has been outspoken on all issues you supposedly care about.
Indy people, I'm genuinely dumbstruck by your endorsement of Doucette over Mike Woodward. Woodward is as able a representative as they come. Knowledgeable, responsive, articulate and thoughtful - he's a terrific guy and an outstanding elected official (at every level). Doucette is a decent enough guy but he's never held elected office.
Why cast out Woodward, based on the contorted rationale that Doucette might, somehow, be more effective as a moderate Republican? First, Woodward represents my voting region exceptionally well. Given the extremism on Jones Street, I've no reason to believe Doucette would, somehow, be more effective. I'm all about consensus-building but not by ousting my perfectly reasonable representative. I simply don't follow your rationale and rue the damage you've wrought.
A vote for Doucette is a vote for Louis Pate. I understand that the Independent is trying to assert some sort of maverick tendency in the NC Senate 22 race, but it's a poor choice. You assert that repeal of HB 2 is a top priority. How does endorsing any Republican get you to repeal? It doesn't.
The same logic you use to justify this endorsement could be used to justify endorsing Jill Stein or Gary Johnson at the top of the ballot. If the stakes are as high as you say, this is not the time for quirky downballot endorsements.
You rightly identify Mr. Doucette as someone whom we should all hope would help steer the NCGOP in a less crazy direction. I would heartily support him to be chair of the NCGOP.
But the Senate is a numbers game, and besides that--Woodard isn't just a Democrat, he's a damn good one.
Bold choice, Indy. Stupid, but bold.
The lede is "the Republican stranglehold on Jones Street must end!", and then they endorse on the basis of wanting at least one sensible Republican.
Laughable. That's not how this works. Somebody ought to explain that you don't win a majority by giving up seats, especially when they are to be filled by capable public servants such as Mike Woodard. His opponent would caucus with the Republicans, that's all you need to know.
I remember when Pat McCrory was lauded as a sensible, sane Republican. There's no such thing. Of all the races you could pick to make a contrarian endorsement, this is a poor choice. Hopefully it won't amount to anything.
1) Orange county cannot support the density needed for affordable housing without water and sewer. So the funds would need to be spent in Chapel Hill, Carrboro or Hillsborough where there is water & sewer. But in the towns land is too expensive. Land owners and developers do not want to sacrifice profits. In point of fact the previous administration in Chapel Hill permitted existing affordable housing to be retrofitted, depleting the stock and making the problem worse. None of the towns have a plan and have had affordable housing funds sitting idle for years. How is this money going to help?
2) The school bond is needed, but there is no plan to fix the budget that created the situation in the first place. I agree that it is an unsustainable approach and voters should demand fixes to obvious problems, not band-aids.
Excellent choice to endorse John McNeil! At a time when less than 20% of the members of Congress are veterans, it's important to have leaders who can make wise choices that are based on fact and not platitude. McNeil has seen firsthand the effects of America's foreign policy choices.
Holding, who is spending millions to label McNeil as an "Odd Duck", is one of the wealthiest members of Congress (wealth he didn't create, his family operates "the largest family-controlled bank in the United States" - First Citizens). Of course, he's never served in the military. He has "served" as legislative counsel for Jesse Helms. Those who don't learn from the past are doomed to repeat it.
Mike Woodard deserves re-election. Greg Doucette is an appealing guy, but Mike Woodard has earned his seat and worked hard to advance the very causes you claim you support. Swing and a miss, Indy.
I am disappointed that you used against the female judges how the MOSTLY male attorneys "rated" them...this is part of the inherent sexism that prevails in the courthouse, courtroom and through out our society.
Indy Week • 201 W. Main St., Suite 101, Durham, NC 27701 • phone 919-286-1972 • fax 919-286-4274
RSS Feeds | Powered by Foundation