I have been a guardian ad litem in Durham county (district 14) for a couple of years
now, and it is in William Marsh's court that I most frequently find myself.
I observe that he is a quiet and humble person, and that his actions
reflect a true concern for the children he serves. In addition, Judge Marsh
grew up in Durham and is quite familiar with the population he now serves
from the bench.
His opponent, Shamieka Rhinehart, is reported to be a very competent
jurist, and she is much more highly rated than Judge Marsh by the NC Bar;
however, that may be due in part to personality differences, and how these
lead each of them to be understood or not so well understood, by the ways
in which they communicate. Also, her background and experience lies in
criminal, and as my GAL supervisor says, we cannot really afford to have
her learning on this bench; with the current case load involving these
social services cases, I think we need someone with the direct experience
to keep on keeping on with the children.
Indy: you're not from around here, are you?
my family needed to fill out IN Application form for Enrolment as Civil Defence Member this month and came across a website that has an online forms library . If you are requiring IN Application form for Enrolment as Civil Defence Member too , here's a https://goo.gl/YCl1Dr
As a concerned citizen, I don't understand why INDY would endorse Mr. Rand over Judge Nagle when INDY had this to say about Mr. Rand on October 16, 2008:
"Raleigh attorney Walter B. Rand, has worked extensively with the Wake Public Defender's office. Unfortunately, Rand has several complaints filed against him in that role. More telling, however, are the complaints from sitting judges that question Rand's competence as a criminal attorney: He was barred from representing indigent clients from 2003-2005. He (Rand) has a criminal history including two arrests for impaired driving."
As I understand the facts, Mr. Rand has three arrests for impaired driving and two convictions for those crimes. I'm perplexed as to why INDY would endorse Mr. Rand's integrity over Judge Nagle who has no such blemishes on his record.
A W Jeffreys
I'm dumbfounded that IndyWeek is endorsing Doucette over Mike Woodard! Seriously, what the hell?! Woodard has stood strong for progressive issues during the most trying of times in our NCGA. He's been an excellent representative and engaged member of our community. He deserves more than your ham-handed compliment - he deserves your support. This is truly disappointing.
The Indy has likely chosen to ignore the Libertarian party as its editors are keenly aware of the appeal the Libertarian party has to so many young and truly independent voters. I have some positions that overlap with Cynthia Ball in House 49, like repealing HB2. I should also note the introduction of third party representatives to Jones Street would really "shake things up". However, the Indy is aware of how competitive House 49 is so they ignored the fact that a Libertarian was in the race. All of the other media outlets I have interacted with so far have at least reported that three individuals are running in House 49. The Indy claims to represent minorities and free thinkers. I assume they want people to vote their conscious and to consider all the candidates. I guess that is just rhetoric; the Indy might as well just be a DNC propaganda arm. Real change will come as the Libertarian party establishes itself as a real alternative to the broken two party system. David Ulmer, LIB for House 49.
Wow, what a misstep not to endorse Mike Woodard. This is exactly the time that NC needs experienced lawmakers to continue to dismantle the mess we are in. Woodard puts every ounce of his energy and time into being with the people he represents and this is no time to fail to appreciate that. Durham is super loyal to Mike and will vote for him anyway.
Makes you wonder how "Indy" is the Indy weekly
Endorsing a republican over the amazing Mike Woodard because Doucettes twitter rants are interesting.
Orange County has both an affordable housing plan (recently adopted) and great providers who desperately need resources to create and preserve housing units. $5 million is a step in the right direction toward meeting a critical community need. It's a shame the Indy has written such an uninformed piece.
You endorse Greg Doucette, a candidate with no legislative experience, because he sends out some cool "twitter rants". You believe it would be to Durham's advantage to have a renegade Republican representing Durham rather than Mike Woodard a hardworking, liberal Democrat. This is further evidence of the Indy becoming smug and detached from the community it serves.This is a newspaper that has lost it's bearings.
Oh wait -- the third time I found it. In the print version -- except you've got Mike Woodard and his opponent running in "House District 22" instead of for state Senate. Yes, you should be embarrassed.
Oh Indy. Clap your hands and spin around 3 times and a moderate freshman Republican will have even the tiniest voice in our intensely divided State Senate. Mike Woodard is doing a great job, represents the views of Indy readers and advertisers, and deserves your endorsement. Be ashamed.
This IS interesting. I don't think I'm going blind, and my sexaginarian eyeballs did NOT detect in the "hard copy" of the 10/19 Independent any mention of N.C. Senate District 22, Democratic incumbent Mike Woodard, or the Republican challenger the Indy endorsed online. I looked twice. Was there a last-second change of heart before you went to press? You need to explain yourselves.
Truly fail to see your logic or lack thereof. My brother-in-law works all the time for District 22. Why not endorse him, as he is progressive, caring, and wants NC to be the best state? To start over with a new Senator seems very short-sighted and really out there. You lost your credibility with me and a large number of readers on this one, Indy. Ashley Wilson Brook
Beth Boswell fails the sense of humor quiz.
CanNOT get over your indefensible endorsement of Doucette over Mike Woodard. Just remember, McCrory was lauded as a moderate, reasonable Republican, and look at what a mess he (and his legislative allies) have made of our state. The water in your office coolers must have been tainted with something pretty serious to make this kind of ridiculous, nonsensical endorsement. I suggest you try again.
you left out the possibility that it could have been a "inside job"
To what audience is the condescending subtitle "PLEASE DON'T SCREW THIS UP" directed? Should we take notes or complete a quiz at the end?
Don't care enough about the Senate 20 race to even mention it?
You reviewed almost 67% of the choices for Dist. 1. Everything from A to B.
Indy Week • 201 W. Main St., Suite 101, Durham, NC 27701 • phone 919-286-1972 • fax 919-286-4274
RSS Feeds | Powered by Foundation