Indy Week | Comment Archives | Stories | Elections | Candidate Questionnaires

Narrow Search

  • Show Only

  • Category

  • Narrow by Date

    • All
    • Today
    • Last 7 Days
    • Last 30 Days
    • Select a Date Range

Comment Archives: Stories: Elections: Candidate Questionnaires

Re: “Christine Walczyk

I wonder how many weeks this campaign will continue. In the meantime, if the allegations have merit, I'm sure the North Carolina Judicial Standards Commission would like to hear of them.

http://www.nccourts.org/Courts/CRS/Council…

Otherwise I'm not sure what the poster is attempting to achieve here.

Posted by ct on 11/28/2016 at 12:59 PM

Re: “Christine Walczyk

Judge Christine Walczyk of the Wake County Courts is CORRUPT. I am not the Plaintiff or Defendant in the case but I was a witness in a case where Judge Walczyk showed no respect at all to one of the litigants in the case. Walczyk violated the rules of the Court and the Rules of Civil Procedure. Walczyk feels she does not need to follow any rules. She mocked and ridiculed a litigant whom was a pro se litigant and told the litigant it was "exhausting" for her to listen to the litigant present her case. She also laughed at the litigant and told the litigant that she thinks "it is funny" that the litigant would think that she would be shown any respect. Apparently Judge Christine Walczyk lost her copy of the Judicial Code of Conduct because Walczyk's behavior completely violates it. Judge Walczyk already committed perjury in this same case as she already lied about what one of the witnesses said in the case even though she heard the testimony herself and then Judge Walczyk completely lied about what the person stated. There is an audio recording of the court hearing as there is of all the court hearings. It shows on the public NC Board of Election Campaign Finance site that Judge Christine Walczyk spent campaign money buying something from a company that is owned by the husband of a lawyer that frequently presents cases in her court. It gets worse and even more corrupt as not only did Walczyk spend money and do business with the lawyer's husband, Walczyk also reimbursed the lawyer as shown on the campaign finance site. C-O-R-R-U-P-T Judge Walczyk hears case frequently from this lawyer. Oh and wait it gets even more corrupt, the Chief District Court Judge named Judge Robert Rader has a wife named Megg Potter Rader and Megg Potter Rader donated a large amount of money to Judge Christine's Walczyk's campaign for fundraising yet Judge Rader is responsible for approving or rejecting Requests for Reassignments. Surprise, Surprise why Judge Walczyk is out of control and thinks the rules just don't apply to her.

3 likes, 0 dislikes
Posted by Stop Corruption on 11/25/2016 at 10:33 PM

Re: “Christine Walczyk

Corruption in the Wake County Courts by Judge Christine Walczyk. Judge Christine Walczyk of the Wake County Courts thinks she is above the law. I am not the Plaintiff or Defendant in the case but I witnessed Judge Walczyk state at a court hearing that she was angry at one of the litigants for putting in Requests for Reassignments against her and that Judge Robert Rader did not approve the Requests for Reassignments. Judge Walczyk laughed about it. Judge Walczyk is laughing because Judge Rader's wife, Megg Potter Rader, contributed money to Judge Walczyk's campaign, so this is the Wake County Family Court, where Judge Robert Rader's wife maintains a friendship with Judge Christine Walczyk and Judge Walczyk makes fun of a litigant in the court for filing Requests for Reassignments against her. Judge Christine Walczyk is a corrupt Judge whom thinks that Judge Robert Rader will just go ahead and cover up her corruption. Also, in the Wake County Family Court is Judge Michael Denning whom stated the discriminatory comment of "China wouldn't be so bad if it wasn't for all the Chinese." Horrible, pathetic job you are doing Judge Robert Rader allowing the Family Court Judges of Judge Michael Denning and Judge Christine Walczyk to violate Rules of Civil Procedure and constitutional rights of the litigants. But apparently all that matters is whom Judge Rader's wife supports in a campaign. Judge Robert Rader should have recused himself from hearing Requests for Reassignments concerning Judge Christine Walczyk as his wife contributed a large sum of money for a fundraiser for Judge Walczyk, but instead of doing that Judge Walczyk just makes fun of the litigant whom put in Reassignments against her and laughs and states that Judge Rader denies the Reassignments. This is complete corruption. Walczyk is so corrupt and apparently stupid as all of the court hearings are recorded from the Court and Walczyk can be heard on the audio recordings making completely inappropriate statements, laughing at and making fun of a litigant where Walczyk even states that she (Walczyk) finds it funny that the litigant filed for reassignments against her and gave them to Rader. Walczyk follows the letter of the law in the meaning of capital C for Corruption, that is all Walczyk follows.

5 likes, 0 dislikes

Re: “Christine Walczyk

Judge Christine Walczyk's spouse recently wrote a post on a Court of Appeals Judge's Facebook that she is such a huge supporter and friend of hers. Problem with this is that the Judge on the Court of Appeals is whom cases could be heard if litigants have issues with Judge Christine Walczyk. How much favortism goes on in the Wake County Courts? Judge Christine Walczyk has already lied during a court case about what one of of the witnesses stated because she favors so much one litigant over the other litigant, Judge Walczyk knows things about the case that only the Defendant and Plaintiff would know before the court case begins. Judges are not supposed to have ex parte communication with any of the litigants. I have witnessed Judge Walczyk being rude, abusive and hostile to a litigant in a case where she laughed at the litigant and referred to her as a joke. Judge Walczyk of the Wake County Courts should be impeached as a Judge.

9 likes, 0 dislikes
Posted by Impeach Judge Christine Walczyk on 11/14/2016 at 3:51 PM

Re: “Christine Walczyk

Shame on Judge Christine Walczyk of the Wake County Courts!! She is the worst!! I have been present in a courtroom with Judge Walczyk as the Judge. I was not the Plaintiff or Defendant. Judge Walczyk stated to one of the litigants that it was exhausting for her to listen to her present her case (she was a pro se litigant). Judge Walczyk then laughed at the litigant present her case and laughed with opposing counsel. Walczyk frequently brought up Judge Michael Denning whom was already removed off of the case from the Chief District Judge for good cause shown. This is the Judge Michael Denning whom stated "China wouldn't be so bad if it wasn't for all of the Chinese." He should be impeached as a Judge for his discriminatory comment that he made during a court case as heard on the audio recording produced from the Court. Walczyk also expressed anger at one of the litigants for filing Requests for Reassignments against her. Judge Walczyk stated in her questionnaire that "The cost of litigation is also a growing concern. With the economic crisis looming, litigants are often choosing to represent themselves rather than hire attorneys. As judges, we have to ensure that the court system works for everyone, and that we minimize the disadvantages to individuals choosing to handle their own legal matters." I witnessed Judge Walczyk laughing at a pro se litigant, allowed the opposing counsel to violate so many different Rules of Civil Procedure and local rules. The litigant whom represented herself pro se proved to Walczyk how the opposing counsel violated many different Rules of Civil Procedure and Walczyk's reply to that was it's "water under the bridge." Obviously, Walczyk is not capable of being a fair or impartial Judge. She had the audacity to state to a pro se litigant that it was exhausting for her (Walczyk) to even listen to the litigant present her case. Walczyk referred to the litigant as a joke and laughed frequently at her. Rude and abusive treatment by a Judge to one party in a case is against the Judicial Code of Conduct. It is all on the audio recording that is produced by the Wake County Courts. That is not the way a pro se litigant should be treated by a Judge. The other litigant in the Court testified to choosing to violate the order, yet Walczyk ignored that. Judge Walczyk is truly the worst Judge. Her campaign manager is a lawyer in the Wake County Courts. I heard a witness testify in front of Walczyk to definitely not stating something about a litigant, yet Walczyk for her bias in favor of the other party, lied and stated that the witness stated something he did not. Yet, there is an audio recording from the court proving the witness testified before Walczyk stating he did not make the statement. Walczyk has stopped following the rules of the Court. Walczyk has had rude and abusive treatment for one of the litigants in the case and complete favortism for the other litigant where even when the litigant admits while testifying in front of her that he chose to violate the order, STILL Walczyk will not find him in Contempt of Court. The litigant's attorney has violated many rules of Civil Procedure yet Walczyk's response to the attorney violating the rules is it's "water under the bridge." Walczyk needs to follow the law, yet she refuse to as she does not follow the Judicial Code of Conduct. Walczyk stated judges are supposed to be "temperate", yet Walczyk is out of control on the court produced audio recording making fun of a pro se litigant trying to present her case.

11 likes, 0 dislikes
Posted by Fairness in the Courts on 11/10/2016 at 7:41 PM

Re: “Anna Elena Worley

I will not vote for Worely based on the info I have found on this site an others AND from her own words that she "represent asylees fleeing oppression and seeking refuge on our shores"
I'm NOT against LEGAL IMMIGRATION, I'm NOT against assisting GENUINE "refugees" in THEIR OWN shores. But I AM AGAINST opening our arms and our country to unvetted refugees from HOSTILE countries especially to those who have NO interest in becoming Americans and embracing our way of life.
I look to what's happening to those areas of the country who are already having a problem with rising rape and murder statistics and to Europe where the landscape has drastically changed, where there is fear on the streets and the police do next to nothing to help and most can't because any action is considered "racial profiling" Those who commit these types of crimes are given a pass because that's their "culture". Frankly speaking let them keep their culture in countries who accept that way of life and let us keep our way of life safe and protected.
I have no intention to support or vote for anyone who feels she has time to devote to "asylees". I have a feeling she should have enough to do representing our own people who are struggling with oppression here in our own shores.

Posted by Susie Anne O'such on 11/04/2016 at 1:47 PM

Re: “Anna Elena Worley

"No one should be scared to come before a court of law in our county or our country to prosecute an assault, to report a theft, to provide the best for his children." - WOW! She says she sits in on domestic violence cases but can't even recognize when financial and emotional abuse is sitting right in her face and even when evidence of it can be proven. It comes as NO surprise that of all the family court judges, she scored the lowest in every category, particularly fairness, competence, clerical/administrative abilities and experience. Vote this woman off the bench. She's ruined more children's lives than she has enhanced them. Just shameful!!!!

3 likes, 0 dislikes
Posted by Sophia Blake on 10/10/2016 at 11:20 AM

Re: “Anna Elena Worley

This is one of the few times in my life I will NOT vote for a Democrat. This woman is one of the most incompetent people to ever be elected to such an important position. I have witnessed her firsthand destroy families, make egregious clerical and administrative mistakes but refuse to own up to them when they are pointed out to her and she clearly has never taken a math course in her life as she doesn't seem to understand gross and net pay are significantly different. I watched her render a woman homeless because she could not afford child support payments and even though the woman was literally living out of her car, she did nothing to correct her poor judgment so this woman could maintain a healthy relationship with her children, all because this woman was poor, could not afford an attorney and had to represent herself. Time for her to go.

3 likes, 0 dislikes
Posted by Sophia Blake on 10/06/2016 at 9:44 PM

Re: “Bev Perdue

Thoughtful comments . I loved the analysis , Does anyone know if my assistant might be able to find a fillable a form version to complete ?

Posted by alaineolivo on 02/29/2016 at 9:17 PM

Re: “Doretta L. Walker

If only Ms. Walker would conduct her language in a court room as well written in this article...her views are highly suspect, but they are her views. It's a shame someone holding the seat of judge should be allowed to conduct herself in a court of law with disregards for respect of the position with slang and speech that is of a less educated individual. The court system should be a place of professionalism and pride...not a place of a reality TV personality "wanna be", (excuse the slang phrase, but seemed necessary to exhibit her vocabulary limits) to fill her ego . Hopefully next election cycle will change the downward spiralling display, a mockery to judges everywhere, and Durham will receive a respectful servant "up in here"... I hate phrases like that!

1 like, 0 dislikes
Posted by RespectTheBench on 10/08/2015 at 10:19 AM

Re: “Brenda L. Cleary

Love this woman!

Posted by butcept on 11/01/2014 at 8:02 AM

Re: “Mark Martin

Issues relating to this policy issue are reasonably likely to be litigated in our courts and, therefore, I am constrained to avoid commenting on this issue.

4 likes, 0 dislikes
Posted by 3van on 10/27/2014 at 5:49 PM

Re: “Clay Aiken

Go Clay Aiken. I wholeheartedly support you on immigration. My great granpa was Cherokee. My granfather, half Cherokee, half white, married twice. His 2nd wife, my step granmom was also part Cherokee. The Cherokee are a dying breed in N.C. There are few Cherokee in N.C. That is why I welcome natives to N.C. be they from Mexico, Central or South America. We need more natives here. It's not right that at every stoplight I come to the majority of faces be white or black. It's not right that only salt-water-immigrants or their descendants say, "yes" and "no" on immigration issues. "Go home and come legally" many people say, but they are ignorant of the fact or don't realize that the only way anyone can come legally from Mexico, Central or South America is that they have to have a lot of money, be rich, own property and be married already and even if you meet the qualifications, they are still denied visas most often. It is very hard to get a Visa to come to the U.S. legally from Latin America, nearly impossible. Latin American Natives can not easily get visas to come legally; many are not doctors or engineers already, as are many muslims coming with degrees, but then Latin American Natives are not suicide bombers either, they do not make planes fall from the sky, do not mean you harm. They are not your enemy. Many are good people and hard workers. Most Latin Americans are Native American ndns and Chrisitans, by God, (just for those of you who are sooo proud of your native roots). I say, "Go Clay Aiken. I'm Chele-Mestizo - white mixed ndn - and you've got my vote".

1 like, 0 dislikes
Posted by David Lee Yellowmoon on 10/26/2014 at 6:59 PM

Re: “Clay Aiken

Go Clay Aiken. I wholeheartedly support you on immigration. My great granpa was Cherokee. My granfather, half Cherokee, half white, married twice. His 2nd wife, my step granmom was also part Cherokee. The Cherokee are a dying breed in N.C. There are few Cherokee in N.C. That is why I welcome natives to N.C. be they from Mexico, Central or South America. We need more natives here. It's not right that at every stoplight I come to the majority of faces be white or black. It's not right that only salt-water-immigrants or their descendants say, "yes" and "no" on immigration issues. "Go home and come legally" many people say, but they are ignorant of the fact or don't realize that the only way anyone can come legally from Mexico, Central or South America is that they have to have a lot of money, be rich, own property and be married already and even if you meet the qualifications, they are still denied visas most often. It is very hard to get a Visa to come to the U.S. legally from Latin America, nearly impossible. Latin American Natives can not easily get visas to come legally; many are not doctors or engineers already as are many muslims coming with degrees, but Latin American Natives are not suicide bombers either, do not make planes fall from the sky, do not mean you harm. They are not your enemy. Most are Native American ndns and Chrisitans, by God, just for those of you who are sooo proud of your native roots. I say, "Go Clay Aiken. I'm Chele-Mestizo - white mixed ndn - and you've got my vote".

1 like, 0 dislikes
Posted by David Lee Yellowmoon on 10/26/2014 at 6:40 PM

Re: “Clay Aiken

Go Clay Aiken. I wholeheartedly support you on immigration.

1 like, 0 dislikes
Posted by David Lee Yellowmoon on 10/26/2014 at 6:25 PM

Re: “Pat Evans

I meet Pat Evans today and I really loved her spirit. Renee from columbus, ga

0 likes, 2 dislikes
Posted by Dixie Powell-Mitchell on 10/04/2014 at 10:11 PM

Re: “Laura Fjeld

Laura Fjeld's conduct as UNC General Administration general counsel is irrelevant. What she does as an attorney may or may not represent her actual position on any subject but it is her job to to argue as directed by the UNC President, his/her designees and the UNC Board of Governors. So, as such, your statement is an argumentum ad hominum tu quoque attack and fallacious (and should be removed by the moderator).

3 likes, 0 dislikes
Posted by CarolinaCalling on 04/24/2014 at 5:52 AM

Re: “Clay Aiken

Clay is extremely intelligent and he has the knowledge and willingness that he will use when he gets to Congress!

Thank you for the endorsement and wonderful interview!!! I sorry that I don't live in NC so I could cast my vote for this wonderful, caring young man.

13 likes, 6 dislikes
Posted by Judy Lautenschleger on 04/23/2014 at 9:22 PM

Re: “Keith Crisco

Ask him about all the jobs he has outsourced to 3rd world countries if he's so concerned about job creation in NC.

Posted by Michelle Noway on 04/23/2014 at 9:14 PM

Re: “Clay Aiken

/\/\r. Aiken is one of the lo\/ing and li\/ing fro/\/\ his heart /\/\en i know out there and all who do know hi/\/\ fell the sa/\/\e as i do and he will do his best being a (ongress/\/\an just as he done all his life ,

15 likes, 4 dislikes
Posted by Lisa Roth on 04/23/2014 at 7:23 PM

Our Guides

© 2016 Indy Week • 201 W. Main St., Suite 101, Durham, NC 27701 • phone 919-286-1972 • fax 919-286-4274
RSS Feeds | Powered by Foundation