HomeNewsOrange County  }

Tethering committee appointment questioned

18 APR 2007  •  by Ashley B. Roberts



A member of Orange County's Animal Services Advisory Board is calling for the removal of a member of the subcommittee studying whether the county should limit or ban the practice of chaining dogs.

"Ms. [Alane] Koki has misrepresented herself, and it is an insult to the community," Ross Oglesbee said. "This woman should be prosecuted for the violation of the public trust."

Oglesbee, the Carrboro representative to the ASAB, confronted Koki and her colleagues at an April 11 meeting of the tethering committee, and followed up with an April 12 e-mail to county commissioners urging them to review Koki's appointment.

A story in last week's Independent ("Member of Orange County's chained-dog study panel has ties to dog-fighting") detailed Koki's background as a breeder of pit bulls and her connections to known dog-fighters—a history she didn't include in her application for the "animal wellness/health expert" seat on the committee considering changes to the county's laws.

"This is outrageous," Koki replied to Oglesbee.

In an interview later, Koki denied being involved in dog-fighting or having a prior business relationship with local breeder Tom Garner, a convicted dog fighter who keeps about 50 pit bulls on chains at his home near Hillsborough.

In an e-mail to Animal Services Director Bob Marotto, Koki complained that her application to the committee—which is public record under N.C. law—had been provided to the press, and called questions from the Independent "harassment."

"I will not have my professional credibility, nor my long history of responsible canine ownership, questioned nor attacked," Koki wrote.

Meanwhile, the committee will hold a public forum on dog tethering April 23 at 7 p.m. in the courthouse at 106 E. Margaret Lane in Hillsborough, and is scheduled to make recommendations by June 1.

4 COMMENTS

So, I'm still not seeing what the misrepresentation was. Or the "insult to the community". Was there a question on there that asked "Do you know Tom Garner?" or "Have you ever raised or bred pit bulls?" You know when I got my job, I didn't mention that I own an Australian Shepherd. I also didn't mention a couple of hundred other people I'm friends or the few thousand that I've ever done any kind of business with. Come on, show me some EVIDENCE. Some guy saying he thinks she's here to help Tom Garner ain't evidence. Even if turns out that she she DID, as a breeder, breed her dogs with Tom Garner's, another dog breeder, that is still NOT evidence. What crappy reporting. Why don't you tell me what the content of her testimony was when she testified in court as an "expert" on dog-fighting? Was she for it?
by JohnD Raleigh 19 Apr 2007, 3:39pm Report this comment
I agree that Ms. Koki misrepresented herself and should be removed from the subcommittee at once. Even if she is not actually a "plant" by her dog-fighting friends, there is the appearance of bias because of her history (that she was likely aware of, or she would have disclosed it.) If she is, as she claims, a professional and expert in the area of animal welfare, then she will understand what the uproar is about and resign. If she is a plant, then of course she will do all she can to stay on the subcommittee and have a vote, and it will be the responsibility of genuine animal lovers to make sure she is dismissed. Either way, she needs to be off the subcommittee ASAP. Having anyone with ties to dog-fighting deciding on chaining regulations is like inviting a pedophile to be on the school board.
by Ms. DM Hillsborough 20 Apr 2007, 6:47pm Report this comment
Ms. DM, what are you talking about?? What "ties" to dogfighting? Let's say for a second that she DOES know this guy Garner. Not that they offer a shred of evidence towards that, but let's say for argument's sake that she does. So what? They're two different people! Has she ever been convicted of dogfighting? And if you want to say that she misrepresented herself then please show ONE thing on her application that wasn't true or ONE question where she could have been more forthright.
by JohnD Raleigh 25 Apr 2007, 12:55pm Report this comment
See http://www.indyweek.com/gyrobase/PrintFriendly?oid=oid%3A73429 "There is other evidence that Koki may be involved in breeding dogs for fighting. On July 7, 2006, authorities in Dane County, Wis., taped a conversation between Koki and a man named Robert Lowery, a former sheriff's deputy accused of dog-fighting and drug trafficking. A transcript of the conversation was introduced as evidence in Lowery's trial. "Does Jeff still have that Lucky dog?" Lowery asked Koki over a recorded jail phone line. "No ... it lost again," she responds. Koki also tried to gain possession of Lowery's pit bulls, which were seized and held at the Dane County Humane Society. Koki visited the shelter twice to try to convince the staff to turn the dogs over to her, says Dave Madden, the animal care director. Meanwhile, Pennsylvania officials have been investigating Koki for nearly a year, after discovering about 50 pit bulls on her property in Mohrsville, Pa., according to Harry Brown, executive director of the Animal Rescue League of Berks County, which is responsible for animal control there. Koki did not have the license required to keep more than 26 dogs, Brown says, and several months into the investigation, most of her dogs were removed. "We went back up to her property to pull a warrant for operating without a kennel license and found she had moved all but 11," says Brown."
by tobenn5412 Hillsborough 20 Nov 2008, 3:53pm Report this comment
Add to the discussion
Post your comment
Add to the discussion
Post your comment
 
return to top