HomeElectionsElection Results  }

Tedesco: No Wake schools coup planned—yet

21 OCT 2009  •  by Bob Geary, rjgeary (at) mac (dot) com



John Tedesco and son
At the end of a long day that began with his opponent, Cathy Truitt, withdrawing from and conceding in the District 2 Wake school board election runoff, a tired John Tedesco wasn't quite ready to call himself the winner—and officially, he isn't just yet. Yet even as he worried about persuading his supporters to show up at the polls Nov. 3, Tedesco could claim the seat representing Garner and Fuquay-Varina—and his place in a new, conquering 5-4 school board majority bent on junking Wake County's diversity regime in favor of a "neighborhood schools" plan.

When Truitt withdrew Monday morning, she issued a sharp warning about the "probable resegregation" of the Wake system under Tedesco and his four allies. Truitt, also a Republican and a career educator, finished a distant second in the Oct. 6 balloting to Tedesco, who fell just short of an outright majority in a five-way race with 49 percent of the vote. But after Truitt called for a runoff—requiring every precinct in District 2 to be open Nov. 3—she unexpectedly quit her campaign, declaring it unwinnable.

At a press conference, Truitt called the new majority politically "savvy" and said it will move swiftly to install its new policies "before opposition forms." She urged parents and community leaders who believe in diversity and oppose resegregation to organize now, before it's too late.

Truitt added that when she sought endorsements from the Wake County Republican Party and the Wake Schools Community Alliance, both groups made it clear that they wanted Superintendent Del Burns replaced. She wouldn't commit to firing him, she said, and they subsequently endorsed Tedesco.

But Tedesco, a 34-year-old New Jersey transplant and a Republican with good things to say about President Barack Obama's education policies, emphasized his opposition to any abrupt overthrow of the status quo. Before the board institutes major changes, he said, the new majority should initiate a community-wide visioning process about the future of Wake County schools, "making sure that everybody's voice is at the table and [with the goal of] building a shared vision" to guide the board.

"Nobody's running in there roughshod," Tedesco countered. "We're not going to do this as a rush job."

As for Burns, Tedesco added, neither the Wake GOP nor the WSCA ever mentioned wanting to fire him, and Tedesco said he has no intention of doing so. Rather, he said, Burns should be asked to develop a plan within 90 days for making a six-month transition to neighborhood schools.

"Why wouldn't we give the man a shot to work with us on creating a new vision?" Tedesco said. "Now, if he doesn't want it, that's another story."

On the issue of whether neighborhood schools will result in segregated schools, either by race or income, Tedesco admitted, "I don't have an easy answer on that one. I don't have all the answers—that's why I want to build a community vision."

Diversity supporters argued that when a school "tips" so that a majority of its students are from low-income households (as measured by their eligibility for the free-and-reduced lunch program), higher-income parents start pulling out their kids, triggering a downward cycle for the school.

In recent years, the Wake school board tried to keep every school below the 40 percent threshold of students eligible for the free- and reduced-lunch program. But the board has been less successful in meeting that goal, due to suburban growth and a steady increase in the number of low-income families living in the eastern part of the county. Last year, one-third of Wake's schools were above the 40 percent target.

Tedesco's view is that there's no "magic number," or if there is one, he doesn't know what it is. But if a neighborhood is predominantly low-income, he added, its schools will require additional community resources to succeed, such as a family resource center run by the county's human services department or an evening GED program for parents.

Strong after-school programs are a must, he said, and early-warning systems should be in place in every school so that students who fall behind in grades 1 through 3 immediately receive the extra help they need.

Tedesco likens his support for "community schools" to policies supported by the Obama administration and Secretary of Education Arne Duncan, who advocated for them when he was in charge of the Chicago school system. The basic idea is that businesses and nonprofits help students and their parents realize their educational and career potential.

Tedesco is head of a nonprofit, the Triangle chapter of Big Brothers Big Sisters of America, an organization that assists disadvantaged kids.

He's met with leaders in Southeast Raleigh, historically the heart of Wake County's African-American community, including newly appointed school board member Keith Sutton, and most have a "legitimate fear" of resegregation, Tedesco acknowledged.

But many of these leaders also want parents to be involved in their kids' schools, which is difficult if the kids are bused for diversity purposes to a school in Cary or Garner.

Tedesco said he told the leaders that if a community school is based in a low-income Southeast Raleigh neighborhood, "I'm committed to making it the gem of our network."

"Of course, I'm only one voice on the board," Tedesco added, part of the majority formed by holdover member Ron Margiotta of Apex and three other newly elected candidates backed by the GOP-WSCA alliance. "But hopefully, a persuasive voice."

A protocol note: Due to the timing of Truitt's withdrawal from the runoff, her name stays on the ballot. After the Nov. 3 election, the Wake County Board of Elections will count her votes and if she receives more than Tedesco, he won't win—but neither will she. A vacancy would be created, which the other eight members of the Wake County School Board would fill.

4 COMMENTS

These people are disingenuous at best, out-right loathsome at worst. They know damn well that they are fighting for re-segregation and that they could care less about the overall education level of society as long as they can keep their schools homogeneous. At least in the old days of segregationists they didn't try to hide it.
by sydfynch Durham 26 Oct 2009, 2:28pm Report this comment
Before you assume everything is racist, and THE MAN is just trying to keep everybody down. You need to take a breath and try to remember small schools in small neighborhoods. If you didn't grow up this way, you missed out. I went to a small, neighborhood school. 300 kids total. K - 8. The Principal and every teacher there knew my name, and my parents name. When there were problems it was on a much smaller and more manageable level. Our School Board and County Commissioners, in their wisdom, started making bigger schools and closing the smaller ones. They said it would give the students more opportunities. Now we have kids who get more opportunities to get into trouble and lost in the system. No one cares about one when you have 2000 to deal with. Smaller, Neighborhood schools will work better. And it is easier to get involved and help. NO AMOUNT OF MONEY or BUSING will make a child learn. It takes teachers who know their students and PARENTS who are willing to help. If it is about who gets more support and money into the schools, that is up to school board and that is an elected body that answers to the voters.
by Rooney NC 26 Oct 2009, 3:43pm Report this comment
In order to improve the schooling, you got to increase parents involvement. If you bus the kids 20 mile away from where they live, how can you increase the parents involvement? I support more funding for schools, small neighborhood schools, where the kids are not redistricted every few years. STOP REDISTRICTING evry few years!!! Instead find out ways how to involve parents in their kids educations.
by Hamind Raleigh 27 Oct 2009, 1:14pm Report this comment

Yes, there are obviously people who like "homogenous" schools. Guess what. They're not all white.

I am not a social conservative, but can still see that busing is not the answer to anything. If you can't teach poor kids close to home you can't team them across town either. Economic busing serves noone and is only meant to mask the problem, making it just slightly harder to identify.

by Jeff S Raleigh 4 Nov 2009, 3:56pm Report this comment
Add to the discussion
Post your comment
Add to the discussion
Post your comment
 
return to top