HomeElectionsThe Election Page  }

Young, but not for Obama

3 SEP 2008  •  by Barry Yeoman

This week, as Nick Ochsner attends the Republican National Convention in St. Paul, Minn., the Elon University sophomore can't listen to all the pro-military speeches without thinking about his father. Sgt. 1st Class Jim Ochsner, a special forces intelligence specialist stationed at Fort Bragg, died in November 2005 in Afghanistan. He was 36, and it was his fourth tour of duty in the country.

The elder Ochsner was on a mission to distribute supplies to Afghanis in Paktika Province near the Pakistani border. Ochsner normally drove the Humvee, but on that day, his son says, "he threw the keys at someone else and they switched seats." As the vehicle headed off, a roadside bomb detonated under the left rear tire, delivering a massive head injury to Ochsner, who died instantly. Everyone else in the vehicle survived.

Before his father's death, Nick Ochsner enthusiastically favored the wars in both Afghanistan and Iraq. Supporting U.S. military missions was an article of faith in his childhood home outside Fayetteville. Losing his father, he says, only deepened that conviction. "A lot of people say, 'Well, Nick, your father was killed. Surely you're against the war.' It's absolutely the opposite," he says. "We have men and women who knew what they were doing when they volunteered for the service, and who have now sacrificed for your and [my] freedom. To withdraw without completing the mission would be a disgrace to them and a slap in the face of their families."

Ochsner has been an active Republican, participating in campaigns from the time he was 13. At the dinner table, his parents talked about politics, and Ochsner took on their conservative views. He supports tax cuts—"I like money," he says—and opposes efforts to regulate gun ownership. "We owned many, many guns at my house," he says. "The Second Amendment exists for a reason. If we educate people, if we make them familiar with weapons, we'll prevent the accidents that people think limiting access to guns would solve." Ochsner says his father exposed him to real and toy guns and taught him about safety, starting when he was 3 or 4.

At Elon, Ochsner quickly rose within the ranks of the campus' College Republicans. This year, he takes over the chapter presidency. He says he's undaunted by the Democratic presidential nominee's popularity among students. "I think it's almost an insult to think that college students, just because we're young, we support Barack Obama," he says. "We have the actor Kal Penn coming to Elon. He's been twice now. That's an example of Barack Obama thinking he can capture the youth vote by flashing movie stars. I think that shows a real misunderstanding of this generation."

Ochsner says he plans to counter Penn's visits by bringing U.S. Sen. Richard Burr and gubernatorial candidate Pat McCrory to campus. He faces an uphill fight. The Harvard University Institute of Politics reported last week that Sen. Obama holds a 23-point advantage over Sen. John McCain, 55 to 32 percent, among likely voters under 24.

Ochsner came to St. Paul with Jack Sawyer, an alternate delegate from Burlington—the Elon student is running Sawyer's campaign for N.C. Secretary of State. Although Ochsner's not a delegate, Sawyer and another friend have been lending him their delegate badges so he attend the convention proceedings. Sunday, he attended a Young Republican party at a local bar. Last night, after the convention session, he was planning to attend a party "that Newt Gingrich may or may not be at."

He managed, though, to avoid the 10,000 anti-war protesters who took to the streets of St. Paul Monday, passing within a block of the Xcel Energy Center, where the convention is being held. "I saw them on the news," he says. "One thing my family always talks about is that my father and thousands of other soldiers have given their lives so that people like that can protest and speak their mind." On the other hand, he says, the demonstrators "clearly obviously aren't connected with the military community. It's one thing to be anti-war, but it's another thing to obviously act without knowing how their actions and how their criticisms are affecting our soldiers. When you act like that, you clearly, clearly are sending a message to our soldiers that you don't support them."

In fact, yesterday's march had a large contingent of veterans, and another contingent of military families. When I mention this to Ochsner, he cuts them a little more slack—but just a little. "That's a different group of people," he says. "But those people volunteered to served their country."

7 COMMENTS

Finally! An actual report from a student who has the sense to decide the issues and the candidate(s) based on integrity, honesty, track record and most importantly, committment to this country that he has ALWAYS been proud of! And proven it with words AND actions and not recounted words.
by MrsSar NC , Elon 4 Sep 2008, 9:52am Report this comment
Young people and students have been change agents in this country for a long, long time. While I respect this student's experience and views, I don't think we can discount the majority view of students as uninformed or dishonest. As a middle-age, white male, I look toward youth for a perspective of what the world could possibly be like. That gives me hope.
by Troy NC 4 Sep 2008, 12:26pm Report this comment
MrsSar, I believe your praise of Mr. Ochsner’s decision-making misses an important detail. The article makes quite clear that "reasoned decision-making" is not the actual motive behind Mr. Ochsner’s support of McCain for president. Here are the pertinent clues from the article…

"...Ochsner has been an active Republican, participating in campaigns from the time he was 13… At Elon, Ochsner quickly rose within the ranks of the campus' College Republicans. This year, he takes over the chapter presidency…”

Mr. Ochsner is going to back whatever candidate that the Republican party tells him to support – and his decision has nothing to do with “integrity, honesty, track record” or “commitment,” as you have mentioned. Mr. Ochsner made his decision to vote Republican long before he knew who he would be voting for. You might want to praise him for voting Republican -- but your praise of his vote based on his ability to make the best decision between the two candidates lacks any integrity, since Mr. Ochsner himself is a Republican political operative, and not likely to be allowed by his political party to see any positive qualities in the opposing candidate.

by VirgilCane NC 4 Sep 2008, 12:36pm Report this comment
VirgilCane I feel the need to express my bitter distaste for your unfounded uninformed comments. As someone who actually knows and has had class with Nick Ochsner I can say with absolute confidence that Nick is a person of sound, fair judgement and integrity. He has been a dedicated Republican for many years it is true, but he is also a student of Political Science. He has the education to make an informed decision between political candidates better than the vast majority of people his age. The idea that he is not allowed to see the positive qualities of the opposing candidates is completely absurd as I have heard him discussing Senator Obama's pros and cons many times. What Nick is doing is great for young people and our political process. Please in the future try to keep your uninformed, bitting comments to yourself.
by Elon09 NC 5 Sep 2008, 2:16pm Report this comment
Dearest Elon09, “…bitter distaste… bitting comments…” and so soon after last night’s healing speech of bipartisan hope – and character assassination – by your Senator McCain. Let’s try this slowly. Your friend, Nick, is president of a chapter of College Republicans. Therefore, it is not a stretch for people of average intelligence to assume that Nick is quite intent on voting for the Republican candidate. It is, however, an enormous stretch to proclaim, as MrsSar did, that Nick’s decision-making ”on the issues and candidate(s) was based on ”integrity, honesty, track record and most importantly, committment to this country…”. Why is it a stretch? Well, you see Nick is a political operative -- president of a chapter of College Republicans – and therefore not in a position which allows him to consider voting for a Democrat. Now, if you do indeed have information that Nick was seriously considering voting for the Democratic nominee – or having secret Obama-fantasies of any nature – you need to file a report, immediately, with the RNC, because when it comes to choosing which candidate to support I’m pretty sure the RNC is not a big fan of free-will or self-determinism.
by VirgilCane NC 5 Sep 2008, 7:04pm Report this comment
VirgilCane, While your opinion is your entitlement, your assumptions are both plentiful and faulty. Whether or not this student is an organizational leader has no bearing on his decision or biases for his candidate choice. Do preachers or pastors not lead a church and yet confess they are not free from sin every single Sunday? Just because someone is a member of the N.R.A. does that make them a gun owner (or even more radically, as you would appreciate, a murderer?) Has John McCain himself, (comparing apples with apples) the new leader of the Republican Party not considered "voting" for Democrat Joe Liberman as his VP? Granted this was not his final choice, but it was considered so highly the media was reporting on him as a top 4 or 5 possibility! This consideration alone is what we are disputing and, while on this topic, As someone who is plugged into the community, I can say that Obama is someone who professors frequently support (openly or implicitly) and students frequently follow this lead. Obama is hyped up more than any other Chicago community figure could ever be. His passionate speeches easily provide hope and promise change in an ever-changing world. It would be easy to think me a McCain supporter after bashing Obama and his over-promising delivery on a "no tax-inflated" budget with limited funds (which is easiest mistake to make if you have never been in charge of a budget before). This two would be a faulty assumption. I do not like McCain, and I think he is over-distancing himself from his own party and (like Obama) over-promising and under-delivering. The whole point of this post is that you cannot make assumptions about individuals based solely on their merits or credentials. Does a single young person going to a bar constitute him/her as an alcoholic? Does a leader of a Republican student organization make them close minded when it comes to voting? Not at all, especially because VOTING is as public or as private as you let it be.
by informedatelon NC 7 Sep 2008, 12:14pm Report this comment
uninformedatelon, Could the weakness of your argument and reasoning be an indication that they aren't making College Republicans like they used to (e.g. Jack Abramoff, Ralph Reed, etc)?
by VirgilCane NC 7 Sep 2008, 12:42pm Report this comment
Add to the discussion
Post your comment
Add to the discussion
Post your comment
 
return to top