The Coalition to Protect all NC Families, which led the unsuccessful anti-Amendment 1 campaign, just issued a statement. Here it is in full:
PROTECT ALL NC FAMILIES RESPONDS TO PASSAGE OF AMENDMENT ONE
“No One Wins Tonight in North Carolina,” says Campaign Manager, Jeremy KennedyRaleigh, N.C. — Tonight the discriminatory and overreaching Amendment One passed on the North Carolina primary ballot, enshrining discrimination into the state’s constitution. The amendment, which also bans civil unions and could strip rights, benefits and protections from children, families, battered women and seniors, made it to the ballot after Republicans took control of both houses of the legislature in 2010. Polling shows that support for LGBT equality is at an all-time high in North Carolina and across the country.
“While we are disappointed in tonight's result, we know this concerted North Carolina effort to defeat Amendment One and protect all of the state’s families galvanized North Carolina and mobilized North Carolinians in historic ways,” said Coalition to Protect All NC Families Campaign Manager Jeremy Kennedy. “From unheard of homegrown fundraising online to unprecedented grassroots activism on the ground, Protect All NC Families was a campaign carried on the backs of countless North Carolinians who worked tirelessly to defeat a divisive constitutional rewrite that would hurt families they know and love. And our fight for fairness is not over.”
Amendment One is about more than marriage. It is overreaching and could have unintended consequences for families, children, women and seniors in North Carolina, including loss of healthcare benefits and domestic violence protections.
Because of Amendment One’s broad language, threatening protections for all unmarried North Carolina couples and their children, it was the Protect All NC Families campaign’s charge to educate North Carolinians about the amendment’s many intended and unintended consequences. In doing so, the campaign had over one million conversations—online and on the ground—with North Carolinians about potential harms to children’s health care, unmarried women’s domestic violence protections, and threats to hospital visitation, end-of-life directives and parental rights.
In North Carolina and across the country there is a shift in public opinion on LGBT equality. The numbers from the vote on Amendment One show there is a multigenerational and multicultural support for equality.
An unprecedented coalition came together to fight Amendment One. The partnerships developed in this campaign were deep and wide. The Coalition to Protect NC Families was proud to partner with the NAACP, over 400 faith leaders from across the state and the theological spectrum, progressive organizations including Equality North Carolina and the Human Rights Campaign, business leaders, students, and every day North Carolinians.
Kennedy added: “This fight was about more than marriage. Amendment One was overreaching and will have unintended consequences for families, children, women, and seniors in North Carolina. We will continue to work with our partners across the state to ensure fairness, equality, and common sense prevail.”
I loved this earlier short by Mimi Schiffman called "Love = Love." I just don't see how you could vote for Amendment 1 after watching it. But then I am always the optimist.
So here's another Schiffman gem. (Thanks for sending it, Mimi.) It's a four-minute film about love, marriage and two guys from North Carolina who went to Washington, D.C., a few days ago because there they could have both.
She calls it "Just a Word."
"You know, everybody says it's just a word, but there's more to it. There's a feeling of belonging," said Jeff Enochs of Charlotte, N.C. "I wanted my state to recognize that we are going to spend the rest of our lives together."
Here's a Vimeo link that you can follow to see other Schiffman films. Schiffman is a graduate student at UNC-Chapel Hill.
Just for the record, there was some thought last night during the anti-Amendment 1 conference call that Obama for America would include a recommendation to the President's supporters to vote against Amendment 1 when OFA issued its pre-primary email blast s today.
President Obama, after all, issued a statement in March opposing Amendment 1.
But no.
Vote for Obama in the Democratic primary, is all that OFA says.
And — uh — you know, make your voice heard at the polls.
Here it is:
Here's a great way folks in North Carolina can show their support for President Obama: Participate in tomorrow's Democratic primary, and cast a vote for the President.The primary is a great opportunity to come out, meet other supporters in your area, and make your voice heard. And even though we already know that President Obama will be our nominee, it's important that we let him know we're standing with him, now and in November.
Look up the polling place in your neighborhood now.
Here's everything you need to know:
Who can vote: Anyone who will be 18 years old by November 6th, 2012, and registered to vote by the April 13th deadline.
What to expect: Longtime registered voters don't need any form of ID to vote. If you are a first-time voter or are newly registered, bring a photo ID or a copy of any document that includes your name and current address (like a utility bill, government check, paycheck, or bank statement).
What if you're not registered at your current address? Unfortunately, you can't vote in the primary, but there is still time to register and cast a ballot for President Obama in November. To print a registration form, go to www.gottaregister.com or contact your local Obama field office.
When and where to vote: Primary voting runs from 6:30 a.m. to 7:30 p.m. You can look up your local polling place here. Your vote matters, and this is one of our easiest chances before November to show President Obama that we've got his back.
So whether you've voted in one of these before, or you're brand-new to this experience, don't miss the North Carolina Democratic primary this Tuesday, May 8th.
Find your polling place now:
http://nc.barackobama.com/Find-Your-Polling-Place
Thanks,
Lindsay
Lindsay Siler
North Carolina State Director
Obama for America
Fayetteville Street in Raleigh Saturday was out in force — OutRaleigh drew an estimated 10,000 folks, all of whom, it seemed, were loving the idea that Amendment 1 might be defeated on Tuesday, putting North Carolina in the forefront of what is undeniably a movement toward equal rights for the LGBT community. (See: Vice President Joe Biden on Sunday.)
OutRaleigh, a project of the LGBT Center of Raleigh, is great evidence of the movement, come to think of it. It hasn't been so many years since a celebration of gay rights on Fayetteville Street in the conservative Cap City would've been unthinkable ... and then controversial ... and now it's fun, and those who don't think so are mostly keeping it to themselves.

Unfortunately, Raleigh, Durham, Chapel Hill and the Triangle are not representative of the North Carolina electorate, apparently. Public Policy Polling is out with a final survey today, and it shows Amendment 1 passing rather easily. This is from PPP's Tom Jensen:
Our final marriage amendment poll finds it leading by a 55-39 margin, little change from a week ago when it was ahead 55-41. The final yes percentage will likely be somewhere in the 57-59% range depending on how the undecideds break. Opponents of the amendment had an uphill battle in convincing voters that it was anything other than a referendum on gay marriage, even though it does go a lot further than that. 57% of voters in the state think gay marriage should be illegal (to only 34% who think it should be legal) and it's not a coincidence that number correlates so closely with the 55% planning to support the amendment.In some sense North Carolinians are voting against their own beliefs. 53% of voters in the state support either gay marriage or civil unions, yet a majority also support the amendment that would ban both. The reason for that disconnect is even with just 24 hours until election day only 46% of voters realize the proposal bans both gay marriage and civil unions. Those informed voters oppose the amendment by a 61-37 margin but there may not be enough time left to get the rest of the electorate up to speed.
On a conference call last night, the campaign manager for the anti-Amendment 1 Coalition to Protect All NC Families continued to express hope that PPP and the other polls showing a wide margin in favor of the amendment will be wrong. "I think we really have a chance for an upset Tuesday night, quite frankly," Jeremy Kennedy said.
That hope hinges on turnout — the idea that large numbers of "unlikely voters" will be drawn to the polls by their desire to vote Amendment 1 down. Pollsters must make some assumptions about who's likely to vote in a primary election, and generally they look for people who've voted in recent primaries. And generally that's a good polling method, producing numbers that are good predictors of the actual result. But if enough people show up to vote in this primary who've never voted in a primary before, it could change the results.
The coalition also released what it called its closing argument, a video mashup of statements against Amendment 1 by, among others, U.S. Sen. Kay Hagan, Gov. Bev Perdue, former Charlotte Mayors Harvey Gantt and Richard Vinroot, NAACP President Ben Jealous and NC President the Rev. William Barber, Chelsea Clinton, Clay Aiken and some non-celebritie as well. It's a reminder that, win or lose, the campaign has broken new ground in North Carolina, giving political shape to what was previously an almost inchoate hope for change on the LGBT front.
There's nothing inchoate about it now. The coalition has raised more than $2.5 million from 11,000 donors, most of them in the state, Kennedy said. "Win or lose," he added, the movement will go on for justice for all minority and disadvantaged people in the state, with the NAACP and the LGBT leadership in coalition from now on.
Early voting is over. If you're registered to vote, the polls are open tomorrow, Tuesday, from 6:30 a.m. to 7:30 p.m. Remember that you can vote in one of the three party primaries (Dem, Repub, Libertarian) or simply ask for a ballot that has Amendment 1 on it by itself — without party candidates.
Former President Bill Clinton recorded a call to North Carolina voters urging them to vote against the anti-gay Amendment 1. That makes two presidents against it. President Obama issued a statement earlier.
Here's the YouTube version of Clinton's call:
The text, from the Coalition to Protect All NC Families:
Statement from President Clinton:
"Hello, this is President Bill Clinton. I’m calling to urge you to vote against Amendment One on Tuesday May 8. If it passes, it won’t change North Carolina’s law on marriage. What it will change is North Carolina’s ability to keep good businesses, attract new jobs, and attract and keep talented entrepreneurs. If it passes, your ability to keep those businesses, get those jobs, and get those talented entrepreneurs will be weakened. And losing even one job to Amendment One is too big of a risk.Its passage will also take away health insurance from children and could even take away domestic violence protections from women. So the real effect of the law is not to keep the traditional definition of marriage, you’ve already done that. The real effect of the law will be to hurt families and drive away jobs. North Carolina can do better. Again, this is Bill Clinton asking you to please vote against Amendment One. Thanks."
State Sen. Don Vaughan, D-Guilford, the only announced candidate for state Democratic Party chair, said last night he is quitting ALEC. His statement follows below.
In calling around yesterday, I heard from party sources that Raleigh City Councilor Mary-Ann Baldwin is among several others who's been dialing for support; Baldwin is expected to announce soon that she's in the contest against Vaughan. Baldwin didn't return my call.
[Update, 2:30 p.m.: I saw Mary-Ann downtown at the OutRaleigh event, working with the "Vote Against" volunteers. Good on her. She said she's been on the phone, will decide whether to throw her — what, hat? — in for party chair by the end of the weekend.]
The new chair will be chosen next Saturday in Greensboro.
I said yesterday that the new chair should be picked by whoever wins the Democratic gubernatorial nomination on Tuesday, either Lt. Gov. Walter Dalton or former Congressman Bob Etheridge.
I heard from some people how unlikely this is; how the grassroots (the new chair will be chosen by about 800 Democratic executive committee members) resent being told what to do; what a thankless job being party chair is — because it's not a real party, as Will Rogers said, it's the Democratic Party — etc. I heard how Gov. Mike Easley couldn't name a chairman, and had his pick rejected by the rank-and-file in favor of Jerry Meek. True, but that was Gov. No-Show himself, and Easley's choice very nearly prevailed anyway.
So, OK, Dalton/Etheridge may duck the duty, missing a chance to establish some bona fides as the legit Democratic Party leader. But I repeat, if the nominee puts his arm around a candidate and tells the party faithful that this is his guy or gal (and I'm assuming here that D/E would pick someone with reasonable party credibility), that person would be a shoo-in to win.
The Democrats are disheartened by their losses and by David Parker's forced resignation. They may not look like they'd welcome some direction from their leaders. But that's because, with Gov. Perdue abandoning her re-election race, they haven't had a leader lately. Tuesday night, they will — if Dalton/Etheridge is ready to take up the mantle.
***
Vaughan is getting out of ALEC, the American Legislative Exchange Council, and sent us this statement:
Those who know me know that I have a long record of working on behalf of the Democratic Party. Those of you who don’t know me can look to my strong Democratic voting record and Democratic leadership in the Senate. I fought against the Republican cuts to our schools. I voted against the attempt to repeal the Racial Justice Act. I’ve fought against the Voter ID law. I voted against Amendment One and continue to fight it every day. I fought against Republican efforts to place limitations on a woman’s right to choose. I also received the Green Tie award from the NC League of Conservation Voters for being someone who stepped up and spoke out for environmental issues at the General Assembly.Many years ago, when I joined the American Legislative Exchange Council it was a nonpartisan group which provided a forum for legislators to discuss issues. However, I agree with the many others who have recently left ALEC. In recent years ALEC has become too partisan. Because of that, I am announcing my resignation from ALEC. I’m proud of my record on the issues. What’s most important for us as a party is to come together and win North Carolina in 2012 for Barack Obama, our gubernatorial nominee, and all of the other Democrats in North Carolina. Our Party, the Democratic Party, is a big tent.
Right now we need to unite and fight the Republicans and make sure that every Democrat wins in North Carolina on November 6 and the Amendment fails on May 8. Let’s keep our eye on the ball and not engage in distracting infighting.
[Update, 5/5: Sen. Don Vaughan, the only announced candidate to replace David Parker, has quit ALEC following yesterday's disclosures. He sent a statement last night; I've copied it below.]
Poor David Parker is out as state Democratic Party chair as of next Saturday, the victim of a sexual harassment claim by an ex-party staffer that he didn't know what to do with. So who should replace Parker?
And replace him, I'd add, at a time when the Democrats are in danger of losing the Governor's office, the Lt. Governor's office and everything else that isn't nailed down in Raleigh ... so that come November, it may actually matter who the state party chair is.
Sen. Don Vaughan of Guilford County has announced his candidacy. Our friend Chris Kromm at Facing South has some bad news about Vaughan: He's an ALEC man. ALEC being the American Legislative Exchange Council, a Koch Brothers enterprise. I'm sure Vaughan has good qualities too.
Some Democrats who played with ALEC in years past have disavowed it of late, if only because it's not as super-secret as it used to be — and its deep ties to right-wingers like the Kochs are now apparent for all to see. Perhaps Vaughan has done so. I put in a call to his office and left a message. Hopefully he'll call and say he's not an ALEC man any more.
Beyond that, I don't have any great insight into Vaughan. What I can say, though, is that we'll wake up next Wednesday and almost certainly will have a Democratic nominee for governor, either Walter Dalton or Bob Etheridge. It's possible the two will be in a runoff, but only if neither hits the 40 percent mark in round one. And given that the other four candidates are polling in the low single digits, they probably won't add up to more than 20 percent, meaning that whoever is in the lead, either Dalton or Etheridge, will win outright.
At that point, it will be within the winner's realm to name a new chair — or rather, to announce a candidate he'd like to see be elected chair when the party's executive committee meets on Saturday in Greensboro.
I cannot imagine that the executive committee — the rank-and-file, sort of — would revolt and not elect whoever it is their gubernatorial nominee has recommended.
Here's what also shouldn't happen. The nominee should not fail to take charge of this process. It's a test of leadership — as easy a test as he'll ever get.
Oh, and he shouldn't recommend an ALEC member for chair, or else there could be a revolt.
Here's what Sen. Vaughan said:
Those who know me know that I have a long record of working on behalf of the Democratic Party. Those of you who don’t know me can look to my strong Democratic voting record and Democratic leadership in the Senate. I fought against the Republican cuts to our schools. I voted against the attempt to repeal the Racial Justice Act. I’ve fought against the Voter ID law. I voted against Amendment One and continue to fight it every day. I fought against Republican efforts to place limitations on a woman’s right to choose. I also received the Green Tie award from the NC League of Conservation Voters for being someone who stepped up and spoke out for environmental issues at the General Assembly.Many years ago, when I joined the American Legislative Exchange Council it was a nonpartisan group which provided a forum for legislators to discuss issues. However, I agree with the many others who have recently left ALEC. In recent years ALEC has become too partisan. Because of that, I am announcing my resignation from ALEC. I’m proud of my record on the issues. What’s most important for us as a party is to come together and win North Carolina in 2012 for Barack Obama, our gubernatorial nominee, and all of the other Democrats in North Carolina. Our Party, the Democratic Party, is a big tent.
Right now we need to unite and fight the Republicans and make sure that every Democrat wins in North Carolina on November 6 and the Amendment fails on May 8. Let’s keep our eye on the ball and not engage in distracting infighting.
It's just one poll, and a given poll can be off by the margin of error — which is 3 points in this one — or it can be wrong. (About one poll in 20 is simply incorrect, as we all learned in statistics).
Still, when Public Policy Polling reported a week ago that Amendment 1's lead was down to 14 points, about half of what it was a few months ago, that was good news for the opposition. Because (and here's another polling maxim), once there's movement in a given direction, it tends to continue, even to accelerate. The same forces that are causing some to make up their minds in a certain way early will cause others to make the same decisions later.
But now, bad news. Amendment 1, as of polling done April 27-29, is still ahead by 14 points.
It's all here in PPP's words. Republican voters are solidly for Amendment 1. Democrats? They're opposed, but not as solidly.
If there's a silver lining, it's that Democrats are probably a whole lot more likely to vote in the primaries than Republicans, given that Mitt and McCrory (there's a team) have their races wrapped up.
In fact, there are other silver linings as well. When people are told (N.B. to the anti-campaign: Tell them) that Amendment 1 would ban civil unions in addition to defining marriage as heterosex-only, they turn sharply against it. It's a 22-point swing, from a 14-percent lead to an 8-percent deficit.
Plus, the youth are really against Amendment 1, and they may be turning out (in early voting, it looks like they are) to an unexpected degree because they're so against it.
Intensity matters. Here's an FYI: The Coalition for All NC Families, the anti-Amendment 1 group, lists 9,600 individual contributors on its new report to the State Board of Elections. That's 37 pages worth of donors (look at the second report listed, called Disclosure) through about a week ago. The Vote for Marriage side — the pro-Amendment campaign team — lists 754 individual donors; they fit on three pages.
Most of the pro-Amendment 1 money comes is coming from the Christian Action League, the National Organization for Marriage, and the Raleigh and Charlotte dioceses of the Roman Catholic Church. Plus a guy named Phil Drake.
Overall, the Coalition — the anti-Amendment 1 group — has raised more than $2.2 million, which is kind of amazing. The Vote for Marriage side has brought in $1.2 million.
From PPP's press release:
The good news for the amendment’s opponents is that more voters are now aware of the amendment’s consequences, and if all voters were informed of those consequences, the amendment would fail by a 38-46 margin, the same as last week.A 40% plurality now knows that the amendment would ban both same-sex marriage and civil unions, versus 36% in the previous survey. Those who know what the amendment would do are against it by 22 points, but they are outweighed by the strong support from the uneducated.
As part of the overall 22-point shift, Democrats move 21 points, Republicans 24 points, and independents 16 points against the amendment when told it would ban both marriage and civil unions for gay couples.
The reason this message has an impact is that 55% of these primary voters want same-sex couples to at least have the same legal rights as married heterosexual couples, if not full marriage equality. That includes 67% of Democrats, 60% of independents, and even 35% of Republicans.
“Voters who understand what the amendment does are opposed to it,” said Dean Debnam, President of Public Policy Polling. “But there’s a lot of education left to be done in this final week of the campaign.”
I've sat in on political discussions with James and can attest to his seriousness about our situation at the local, …
by jdlestina on Gubernatorial candidate James Protzman could rouse the Democrats (Citizen)
In that case I would edit article to this:
"Such "whatevers" include the strange, wonderful, deconstructive show called The …
by MedicineCity on Three new art spaces testify to downtown Durham's increasing vitality (Visual Art)