Citizen

The Raleigh news & politics blog of the Independent Weekly

Archives | RSS

Thursday, December 8, 2011

Trespass case of Occupy Raleigh's Margaret Schucker pushed to January

Posted by Bob Geary on Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 11:21 AM

Margaret Schucker, the disabled Occupy Raleigh participant arrested at the State Capitol October 27 for sitting in her chair on the sidewalk, was in a Wake County courtroom this morning expecting her case to be heard. It wasn't. According to her lawyers, the prosecution didn't intend the case to be tried today and scheduled it instead for Jan. 10.

Schucker was charged with second-degree trespass when she refused to get up from her little folding chair after the Capitol Police ordered all of the OR demonstrators to get their stuff off the sidewalk. The demonstrators were told they could stay but their stuff — food, signs, chairs, bed rolls — had to go.

Schucker didn't consider her chair to be "stuff," but rather a necessity — given her very bad back — for her to be able to stay and exercise her First Amendment rights.

Katy Parker, legal director of the ACLU of North Carolina Legal Foundation, was in court with Schucker today. Parker (see this ACLU statement) is co-counsel on Schucker's case along with Durham attorney Scott Holmes.

At least one other of the eight Occupy Raleigh folks who were arrested that day was also in court this morning. Katina Gad said she'd been notified to be in a different courtroom at 12 noon anytime between 7:45 a.m. and 3 p.m. So Gad was surprised, when she arrived to support Schucker, to see both of their names on the 9 a.m. list for Courtroom 2C. Gad's case was also put off until Jan. 10. Gad (shown next to Schucker in the picture below) was among the demonstrators who sat down with Schucker in a show of solidarity as the Capitol Police were preparing to arrest her. Gad's lawyer is Raleigh attorney Steve Edelstein.

Margaret Schucker and (to her left) Kat Gad before they were arrested.
  • Margaret Schucker and (to her left) Kat Gad before they were arrested.

Tags: , , , , , , ,

Comments (1)

Showing 1-1 of 1

Add a comment

Please explain how her 1st Amendment rights were violated. She was allowed to stay. She could have sat on the ground, against a bench, against a tree, etc.

report 1 like, 0 dislikes   
Posted by as400_guru on 12/09/2011 at 12:33 PM
Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-1 of 1

Add a comment

Latest in Citizen

More by Author

Facebook Activity

Twitter Activity

Read indyweek's Tweets

Comments

A War on the Family
The Family is under attack sometime I ask myself does anyone in America believe in …

by mayorbell1172 on (Updated x 2) Amendment 1 passes easily, and other primary results (Citizen)

I've always been proud to call myself a North Carolinian.... Till now - just goes to show we are a …

by Sara Rhodes on (Updated x 2) Amendment 1 passes easily, and other primary results (Citizen)

© 2012 Independent Weekly • 302 E. Pettigrew St., Suite 300, Durham, NC 27701 • phone 919 286 1972 • fax 919 286 4274
RSS Feeds | Powered by Foundation