Citizen

The Raleigh news & politics blog of the Independent Weekly

Archives | RSS

Friday, June 3, 2011

You go, Gov: Perdue bypasses the GOP, orders that those entitled to jobless benefits receive them (UPDATE: And it gets better ...)

Posted by Bob Geary on Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 2:40 PM

Perdue keeps stirring up trouble for the GOP
Can she do it? She can try. Let the Republicans find a judge who'll block it, but for now, Gov. Bev Perdue has declared — via executive order — that 47,000 people who should've been getting extended jobless benefits but weren't because the Republican General Assembly refused to pass a routine bill are entitled to receive them and they will.

The Republicans have tried to tie Perdue's hands in the budget fight — the subject of our cover story this week — by linking the jobless benefits bill to their budget bill — Either you agree to our budget, they've told Perdue, or we'll make the jobless suffer.

Today, she told them — again — where to put that stuff.

[UPDATE, 3 P.M.: If you wondered why a handful of House Democrats may abandon Perdue on the budget and side with the Republicans, here's a hint: The Republicans can redistrict them right out of office. As GOP Minority Leader Paul (Skip) Stam was heard to say today by, among others, the Greensboro News & Record.]

[UPDATE, 4:30 P.M.: Senate President Pro Tem Phil Berger responds for the GOP: “We have directed our nonpartisan staff to study whether the governor’s act is legal. We hope that, in a desperate effort to claim credit for what’s going to occur because of the bipartisan budget, she is not putting the benefits of tens of thousands of unemployed North Carolinians at risk by using a questionable legal gimmick. If she really thinks this is appropriate, she shamefully did nothing for seven weeks.]

[UPDATE, 5:15 P.M.: The N&O writeup about the GOP's screwup with their microphone — and Perdue's response to it — is a must-read.]

***


I have no idea if the governor has the actual legal authority to do what she did. But until a court tells her she doesn't, the jobless benefits will go out — as they should. Or wait, will the Republicans really go to court to argue that people entitled to unemployment benefits shouldn't get them until the budget fight is settled?

Is Perdue's action legal? Who knows.

Is it the right thing? Yes.

***


Here's Perdue's statement (a copy of the executive order follows below):

“For weeks, I have been trying to work with the Republican legislative leaders to get them to do the right thing: send me a clean bill to extend the unemployment benefits for 47,000 North Carolinians who have lost their jobs. But instead of acting responsibly on this matter, the Republican legislature has repeatedly refused to send me such a bill. Instead, they have persistently attempted to use our unemployed workers as hostages by tying the extension of their benefits to my acceptance of budget bills that would inflict severe and unnecessary cuts to our schools and other essential programs.

Meanwhile, thousands of North Carolina families are running out of money and options. I hear from them all over the state. They visit my website and Facebook page to beg for help.

One woman called my office recently. She has a background in accounting and has been looking for work for months. Because she lost her benefits she and her daughter can no longer stay in their apartment. They have nowhere to put their belongings so they will also lose everything that they can’t carry to the homeless shelter.

Sadly, this story is not unique. The people I hear from say they can’t keep the lights on. Banks are ready to foreclose.

And yet, the Republicans in the legislature stubbornly cling to their political games. Just yesterday, they voted down a measure to separate this issue from their budget. Enough is enough. They continue to use desperate people as leverage to extort my support for an ideologically-driven budget that needlessly cuts millions from our public schools and inflicts millions of dollars more in damage to our universities, pre-school programs, community colleges, job creation efforts and vital health care services. I will not stand for it and I will not sit by idly as the legislature continues to play these games and deny the jobless the unemployment benefits they need.

Let me remind you that the extension of unemployment benefits for the unemployed costs the state of North Carolina nothing; the benefits are paid for entirely with federal funds.

Every week we deny these benefits is another week that we keep $11 million of federal funds from flowing into our economy. This money would pay for things like groceries, rent and clothing and help small businesses who sell these items or collect that rent.

North Carolina cannot wait any longer for the legislature to do what they should have done more than a month ago. Today, I am issuing an executive order extending federal unemployment benefits to these 47,000 North Carolinians. Republican leaders in the General Assembly have been unwilling to take the necessary steps to extend these benefits, and no doubt they will attempt to interfere with this action. But I, for one, believe these people are entitled to and need these federal funds, and the Republican-controlled legislature needs to stop using the unemployed as pawns.”

***

Here's the executive order:

perdueexecorder.pdf

Tags: , ,

Comments (4)

Showing 1-4 of 4

Add a comment

To as400_guru: you are so quick to open your mouth and speak stupidity. With all the tax breaks that we give corporations to leave the US and find cheap labor how can anyone find employment. All the US companies that have their products built in other countries to sell in the US is hurting both the people who pays for their tax breaks and the US economy, but you're to ignorant to understand that. We are constantly importing goods from other countries, and not exporting any goods to these same countries, THAT IS HOW A PERSON CAN GO 24 MONTHS WITHOUT FINDING EMPLOYMENT!! Who do you know that have been on unemployment for 5 years? Stop listening to the media, and open your eyes and make your own opinions. Are you for giving the big corporations money that they do not need, to keep jobs going out of America or giving the money to Americans that can use the money to pay rent, buy food for their families, and spending it in the economy to keep prices down. Get off your high horse, because even though you may not need help now, doesn't mean that you won't need help LATER!!!! JERK

report   
Posted by cdjohnson62 on 06/06/2011 at 12:12 PM

Gee, what government sanctioned child abuse center (aka, public school) did you attend? "Let me remind you that the extension of unemployment benefits for the unemployed costs the state of North Carolina nothing; the benefits are paid for entirely with federal funds." WHere do you think the federal funds come from? Business and taxpayers.

The definition of a loser is someone who cannot find a job in 75+ months. Cut them off entirely and they will find a job. Some may have to move. I had to move to 5 different states in the last 10 years. I refused to sit on my ass and suck off the unemployment nipple.

report   
Posted by as400_guru on 06/05/2011 at 2:03 PM

Here you go.

Barreto, Matt, Stephen Nuno, and Gabriel Sanchez. 2009. “The Disproportionate Impact of Voter-ID Requirements on the Electorate—New Evidence from Indiana." PS: Political Science & Politics. 42 (January)

Find the paper at: http://faculty.washington.edu/mbarreto/pap…

The paper looks at access to valid photo ID in adult citizens of Indiana. 86.4% of whites have access to valid ID, blacks have 73.4% access.

Republicans have 91.1% access to valid ID, Democrats have 83.0% access.

Folks with less than $40K have 82.5%, folks with over $80K have 88.2%.

They find the same pattern in CA, NM, and WA.

"We find that age, race, and income significantly
impact the likelihood of having proper identification
required to vote under the Indiana statute."

Voter ID bills are Voter Disenfranchisement bills.

report   
Posted by WillWilson on 06/05/2011 at 1:08 PM

Per your Gov. Perdue article on page 21 of the 6-1-11 issue: How does showing a photo ID suppress Democratic vote and not other political party votes?...

report   
Posted by Apolitical1 on 06/05/2011 at 12:28 PM
Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-4 of 4

Add a comment

Latest in Citizen

More by Author

Facebook Activity

Twitter Activity

Read indyweek's Tweets

Comments

A War on the Family
The Family is under attack sometime I ask myself does anyone in America believe in …

by mayorbell1172 on (Updated x 2) Amendment 1 passes easily, and other primary results (Citizen)

I've always been proud to call myself a North Carolinian.... Till now - just goes to show we are a …

by Sara Rhodes on (Updated x 2) Amendment 1 passes easily, and other primary results (Citizen)

© 2012 Independent Weekly • 302 E. Pettigrew St., Suite 300, Durham, NC 27701 • phone 919 286 1972 • fax 919 286 4274
RSS Feeds | Powered by Foundation