Why aren't derivatives regulated? Why is Wall Street allowed to get away with economic murder? | Citizen | Indy Week
INDY Week columnist Bob Geary's Raleigh news & politics blog

Archives | RSS

Tuesday, April 27, 2010

Why aren't derivatives regulated? Why is Wall Street allowed to get away with economic murder?

Posted by on Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 2:18 PM


So here's your civics test: Guess how much money Wall Street securities and investment firms and their partners contributed to candidates for national office since 1998?

By the way, the two political parties and their candidates got roughly the same amounts, unlike what press releases today from the offices of U.S. Sen. Richard Burr, R-NC, and NC GOP Chairman Tom Fetzer might've led you to believe.

For extra credit, answer the question: Why doesn't Congress crack down on the Wall Street gang and prevent them from rolling out the next crazy credit explosion that makes them tons of money while wrecking world economies?

Answers — and a lot of great detail from our friends at Democracy North Carolina — below the fold.

And the answer to the first question is: $560 million.

Yes, that's right, half a billion dollars in political contributions, which of course leaves out all the salaries and bonuses paid to ex- and wanna-be officeholders, congressional staffers, U.S. Treasury Secretaries, Federal Reserve Board Chairmen, and — well, you get the idea.

The answer to the bonus question: Same as above.

Burr and Fetzer issued statements today casting aspersions on the Democrats who take money from Wall Street.

But as Democracy NC's Bob Hall points out, they're conveniently overlooking the fact that GOP'ers, too, are on the take attentive to the wishes of Wall Street contributors.

Bottom line, says Hall:

Both political party and most federal candidates rely heavily on Wall Street and other financial interests for campaign contributions. Given that reliance, the media and public should be vigilant about the details of any financial reform legislation and attentive to the evaluations of independent consumer-protection groups. But it’s unrealistic to expect candidates of either party to abandon their dependence on Wall Street as a source of campaign money unless they have a significant alternative, such as the “voter-owned elections” programs that provide optional public financing for some state candidates in North Carolina.

Tags: , , , ,

Pin It


Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

INDY Week publishes all kinds of comments, but we don't publish everything.

  • Comments that are not contributing to the conversation will be removed.
  • Comments that include ad hominem attacks will also be removed.
  • Please do not copy and paste the full text of a press release.

Permitted HTML:
  • To create paragraphs in your comment, type <p> at the start of a paragraph and </p> at the end of each paragraph.
  • To create bold text, type <b>bolded text</b> (please note the closing tag, </b>).
  • To create italicized text, type <i>italicized text</i> (please note the closing tag, </i>).
  • Proper web addresses will automatically become links.

Latest in Citizen

More by Bob Geary

Twitter Activity


The mayor can and should point to Dix Park as a tangible accomplishment that will have lasting ramifications for Raleigh. …

by Protect Falls on McFarlane fundraiser kicks off 2015 Raleigh election year (Citizen)

As is Chavis Park, Doug. But both are relatively small compared to Umstead, NCMA and, when it happens, Dix Park.

by Bob Geary, INDY Opinion Columnist on Dix Park: The Deal is Done (Citizen)

Most Read

No recently-read stories.

Visit the archives…

Latest videos from the INDY

© 2015 Indy Week • 201 W. Main St., Suite 101, Durham, NC 27701 • phone 919-286-1972 • fax 919-286-4274
RSS Feeds | Powered by Foundation