Citizen

The Raleigh news & politics blog of the Independent Weekly

Archives | RSS

Friday, November 6, 2009

A reader asks, What exactly is in the House health care reform bill?

Posted by Bob Geary on Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 3:21 PM

click to enlarge unknown.jpg

Perhaps that reader was you? In any event, the complete text of the bill, H.R. 3962  is available for your perusal on Congressman David Price's website (h/t Lenice Williams), should you care to attempt it. Also, links to an overview of the bill, section-by-section summaries, and a helpful piece of propaganda from the House Ways and Means Committee, "Top 14 Provisions that Take Effect Immediately."

I've been following this thing pretty closely, and I didn't know six of them.

Did you know, for example, that the bill  creates a long-term care program, financed by voluntary payroll deductions,  for adults who become functionally disabled? I didn't.

The House vote on H.R. 3962 could come as early as Saturday evening, or may be delayed until Tuesday depending on how much flack the Republicans throw at it. (There's not a single GOP vote for it, apparently.) Democratic leaders say they're closing in on the 218 votes needed for passage, according to Talking Points Memo.

Fingers crossed. For Larry Kissell fans, do not look at what BlueNC's James Protzman has to say about Kissell's announced position in opposition to the bill. I'm betting he comes around in the end.

Tags: , , ,

Comments (2)

Showing 1-2 of 2

Add a comment

Kissell did NOT support the Stupak amendment. That would go his promise to protect privacy, choice and women. He also did NOT support the last version of the House health bill which would have went against his promise to protect Medicare and seniors. All NONPARTISAN wags agree, the half trillion cut from senior care makes HR 3962 a very bad bill. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/11/14/AR2009111402597.html

report   
Posted by Soloman on December 3, 2009 at 6:52 AM

How did Kissell vote in the end? I am pretty sure he and two other NC Democrats, as well as all the Republican members of the House, voted "No." Also, Kissell supported the Stupak amendment, too, didn't he? As one wag put it, "Stupak is, as Stupak does."

report   
Posted by mbrock49 on November 27, 2009 at 12:38 AM
Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-2 of 2

Add a comment

Author Archives

Facebook Activity

Twitter Activity

Read indyweek's Tweets

Comments

There is no discrimination here. None. Zero. Zip. Zilch. Nada. Homosexual men and women have the exact same rights are …

by as400_guru on Unconstitutional: California's same-sex marriage ban is discriminatory, federal appeals court says. (Citizen)

Even Though Rep. Weiss didn't represent me, since I live in Durham, she ably represented the things I believe in. …

by Steve Bocckino on Rep. Jennifer Weiss won't run again: Bad news (Citizen)

© 2012 Independent Weekly • 302 E. Pettigrew St., Suite 300, Durham, NC 27701 • phone 919 286 1972 • fax 919 286 4274
RSS Feeds | Powered by Foundation