Movie review: The Expendables 3 feels as long in the tooth as its cast | Arts | Indy Week
Arts
INDY Week's arts blog

Archives | RSS | Follow on

Friday, August 15, 2014

Movie review: The Expendables 3 feels as long in the tooth as its cast

Posted by Google on Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 11:30 AM

click to enlarge Dolph Lundgren as Gunner Jensen - PHOTO BY PHIL BRAY
  • photo by Phil Bray
  • Dolph Lundgren as Gunner Jensen
The Expendables 3
★★
Now playing


In 1993, Arnold Schwarzenegger starred in Last Action Hero, a satire of the action film genre. While not a well-made film, its premise was prescient. The days of the big Hollywood action star—a lineage that runs from the swashbuckling Douglas Fairbanks through such paragons as John Wayne, Steve McQueen, Clint Eastwood, Sylvester Stallone and Schwarzenegger—were waning.

Today, the action genre survives and continues to thrive. But our craving for larger-than-life heroes has fallen prey to decades without major wars (movie heroes were partly born from our desire to animate their real-life archetypes) and advances in computer-generated imagery, which have democratized action casting. Now any actor can be the hero, including Tom Cruise, Matt Damon, Robert Downey Jr., Tobey Maguire and Scarlett Johansson. Big-budget action movies once served their lead actor; today it’s the other way around.

The Expendables series addresses the plights of both action movie leads and the actors behind them. The characters are over-the-hill paramilitary mercenaries out to show they still have what it takes to save the day. The actors playing these roles are a cadre of over-the-hill action stars out to prove they can still entertain audiences (and earn a paycheck).

But that function was served four years ago with the first Expendables film. Two sequels later, The Expendables 3 feels as long in the tooth as its geriatric cast. The plot, such as it is, has Stallone leading a band of younger Expendables to apprehend a brutal international arms dealer played by Mel Gibson. But when the whippersnappers are captured, it falls to Stallone and his old crew to save the day.

Listing character names is pointless, as there’s little to separate the actors from their token roles. Indeed, meta flybys sustain the film, which opens with Sly and company breaking former comrade Wesley Snipes out of a foreign military prison—he was jailed for “tax evasion,” Snipes’ character quips.

Libation-loving Dolph Lundgren takes several swigs from a flask. Kelsey Grammer references his multiple divorces and children. A garrulous Antonio Banderas is a Spanish war vet who lies about his age to get a job. Harrison Ford gets to pilot in a dogfight again. Schwarzenegger tells everybody to “Get to da chaw-pa!” And Gibson chews the scenery as a villain once cast aside by the establishment (wink wink) with more gusto and acting acumen than the film deserves. There’s even a shot fired at Bruce Willis, who declined to reprise his role from the previous two films over a salary disagreement—his character is called “an asshole” and “no longer in the picture.”

Unfortunately, the rest of The Expendables 3 is formulaic filler. The younger cast members—including boxer Victor Ortiz, MMA star Ronda Rousey and Kellan Lutz (who was Emmett Cullen in the Twilight films)—are charmless, witless bores, although I wonder if that was somewhat intentional, given the film’s premise.

At times, the film inserts extended action sequences that are little more than collages of cannon fodder and bad CGI. It would have been wiser to fully embrace the film’s satirical side, à la Tropic Thunder or even Last Action Hero. Otherwise, for anyone without a frame of cinematic reference that predates 1990, this feels much like its title suggests: expendable.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

Pin It

Comments

Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

INDY Week publishes all kinds of comments, but we don't publish everything.

  • Comments that are not contributing to the conversation will be removed.
  • Comments that include ad hominem attacks will also be removed.
  • Please do not copy and paste the full text of a press release.

Permitted HTML:
  • To create paragraphs in your comment, type <p> at the start of a paragraph and </p> at the end of each paragraph.
  • To create bold text, type <b>bolded text</b> (please note the closing tag, </b>).
  • To create italicized text, type <i>italicized text</i> (please note the closing tag, </i>).
  • Proper web addresses will automatically become links.

Latest in Arts



Twitter Activity

Most Recent Comments

Hi Zack,

I'm reading this again after seeing it almost 5 months ago. Our new Quail Ridge Books is …

by Lisa Robie Poole on Remembering Quail Ridge Books Founder Nancy Olson, a Reader's Best Friend (Arts)

Thanks RobU. This review ran online only.

by Brian Howe, INDY managing editor for arts & culture on Theater Review: Three Shakespeare Plays Are Pared Down to a Ninety-Minute Game of Dramatic Chess in Henry VI (Arts)

Great review! Since it was out in previous paper, how do we get this in print? Possible to order it?

by RobU on Theater Review: Three Shakespeare Plays Are Pared Down to a Ninety-Minute Game of Dramatic Chess in Henry VI (Arts)

This show is dreadful. I watched clips of the London production which lacked the wonderful sets in the Australian production. …

by mrappleby on Love never dies, but many terrible musicals have: Sitting through Andrew Lloyd Webber's Phantom sequel. (Arts)

Awesome summation of the beauty and skill surrounding this tap festival! Great Job Dan!
Annabel's mom💕 …

by Dcable on Dance Review: Tap Genius Michelle Dorrance Brings It Home at the NC Rhythm Tap Festival (Arts)

Comments

Hi Zack,

I'm reading this again after seeing it almost 5 months ago. Our new Quail Ridge Books is …

by Lisa Robie Poole on Remembering Quail Ridge Books Founder Nancy Olson, a Reader's Best Friend (Arts)

Thanks RobU. This review ran online only.

by Brian Howe, INDY managing editor for arts & culture on Theater Review: Three Shakespeare Plays Are Pared Down to a Ninety-Minute Game of Dramatic Chess in Henry VI (Arts)

Most Read

© 2016 Indy Week • 201 W. Main St., Suite 101, Durham, NC 27701 • phone 919-286-1972 • fax 919-286-4274
RSS Feeds | Powered by Foundation